Search

The rheology of aqueous solutions of Pluronic F127 is studied as a function of concentration, temperature, and shear rate. At sufficiently low temperatures, the solutions behave like Newtonian fluids; a simple empirical model is proposed for the viscosity as a function of temperature and concentration. The solutions undergo a transition to a gel at higher temperature, above which a complex rheological behavior is observed. In this regime, the solutions are viscoplastic with a yield stress that can be as large as hundreds of Pascal. We provide Herschel–Bulkley fits to the rheology for a range of temperatures above the gel point. At much higher temperatures, the rheology of the solutions becomes unsteady and difficult to characterize in terms of a steady-state flow curve.

High molecular weight paraffins are known to form gels of complex morphology at low temperatures due to the low solubility of these compounds in aromatic or naphthene-base oil solvents. The characteristics of these gels are strong functions of the shear and thermal histories of these samples. A model system of wax and oil was used to understand the gelation process of these mixtures. A significant depression in the gel point of a wax-oil sample was observed by either decreasing the cooling rate or increasing the steady shear stress. The wax-oil sample separates into two layers of different characteristics, a gel-like layer and a liquid-like layer, when sheared with a controlled-stress rheometer at high steady shear stresses and low cooling rates. The phase diagram of the model wax-oil system, obtained using a controlled-stress rheometer, was verified by analyzing the wax content of the incipient gel deposits formed on the wall of a flow loop. Based on the rheological measurements, a law has been suggested for the prediction of the wax content of the gel deposit on the laboratory flow loop walls. The wax content of the incipient gel formed on the wall of a field subsea pipeline was predicted to be much higher than that for the flow loop at similar operating conditions. This variation in the gel deposit characteristics is due to the significant differences in the cooling histories in the two cases.