151. A European research agenda for geriatric emergency medicine
- Author
-
Thordis Thorrsteindottir, Beatrice Gasperini, Simon P. Mooijaart, Laura C. Blomaard, Marije van der Velde, Christian H. Nickel, Mehmet Akif Karamercan, Lisa S. van Tol, Renan Spode, Mareline Olthof, Sigrun Skúldóttir, Rosa McNamara, Zerrin Defne Dundar, Simon Conroy, Yvonne Schoon, Bas de Groot, Pieter Heeren, Jacinta A. Lucke, Katrin Singler, F. Javier Martin Sanchez, Áine Mitchell, Bianca M. Buurman, James Wallace, James van Oppen, Geriatrics, APH - Aging & Later Life, and APH - Quality of Care
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Delphi Technique ,Modified delphi ,Psychological intervention ,Healthcare improvement science Radboud Institute for Health Sciences [Radboudumc 18] ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Multidisciplinary approach ,Health care ,medicine ,Humans ,Relevance (law) ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Aged ,Health Priorities ,business.industry ,European research ,030208 emergency & critical care medicine ,Emergency department ,Geriatric Emergency Medicine ,Europe ,Healthcare settings ,Emergency medicine ,Emergency Medicine ,Emergency Service, Hospital ,business ,Research prioritisation ,Research Paper - Abstract
Key Summary Points Aim To provide an inventory and prioritisation of research questions amongst GEM professionals throughout Europe. Findings A list of 10 research questions was identified and prioritised. Message The list of research questions may serve as guidance for scientists, policymakers and funding bodies in prioritising future research projects., Purpose Geriatric Emergency Medicine (GEM) focuses on delivering optimal care to (sub)acutely ill older people. This involves a multidisciplinary approach throughout the whole healthcare chain. However, the underpinning evidence base is weak and it is unclear which research questions have the highest priority. The aim of this study was to provide an inventory and prioritisation of research questions among GEM professionals throughout Europe. Methods A two-stage modified Delphi approach was used. In stage 1, an online survey was administered to various professionals working in GEM both in the Emergency Department (ED) and other healthcare settings throughout Europe to make an inventory of potential research questions. In the processing phase, research questions were screened, categorised, and validated by an expert panel. Subsequently, in stage 2, remaining research questions were ranked based on relevance using a second online survey administered to the same target population, to identify the top 10 prioritised research questions. Results In response to the first survey, 145 respondents submitted 233 potential research questions. A total of 61 research questions were included in the second stage, which was completed by 176 respondents. The question with the highest priority was: Is implementation of elements of CGA (comprehensive geriatric assessment), such as screening for frailty and geriatric interventions, effective in improving outcomes for older patients in the ED? Conclusion This study presents a top 10 of high-priority research questions for a European Research Agenda for Geriatric Emergency Medicine. The list of research questions may serve as guidance for researchers, policymakers and funding bodies in prioritising future research projects.
- Published
- 2020