Search

In phase I (safety) trials, we have demonstrated the feasibility of autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for patients with autoimmune diseases. Although this review comments on results of our phase I trials, the focus is on phase II (efficacy) trials using gene-marked autologous stem cells.

The treatment of severe autoimmune diseases has been recently revitalized by the introduction of intense immune suppression with immune ablative intent followed by three different procedures. These are allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), autologous HSCT (using either marrow or peripheral blood), and intense immune suppression without stem cell support. Current trials suggest that high dose immune suppressive therapy with or without autologous hematopoietic stem cell support can induce remission of previously refractory disease. Follow-up is too brief to determine if intense immune suppression, and more specifically autologous HSCT, will ultimately cure SLE. It is conceivable that an allogeneic source of stem cells from a normal donor (e.g. HLA matched sibling) will be required to achieve a cure. It is also possible that autologous HSCT, even if not curative, may prolong the life of patients with otherwise high-risk features. In carefully selected patients, the potential benefits of this procedure may outweigh the risks.

The overall goal of adoptive immunotherapy with genetically modified lymphocytes is to decrease the morbidity and mortality associated with allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. The initial data reviewed here suggest that the behavior of the allogeneic HStk transgenic cells can be modified after administration to patients. Further study is needed to identify the response rates and risks associated with this procedure. In particular, larger studies will be needed with appropriate randomization to determine if the response rate to genetically modified cells is equivalent to the response rates with unmodified cells. Wider application of these techniques in the initial setting of allogeneic transplantation will undoubtedly occur and such trials have been initiated at several institutions. Careful attention to vector, suicide gene, selectable marker, efficiency of transduction, and cell dose will be necessary when comparing different trials since these variables will probably affect transgenic cell survival and response rates. [figure: see text]

In addition to our center (Northwestern University, Chicago), several institutions in the United States (Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, University of California at Los Angeles, and Medical College of Wisconsin) and Europe are activating protocols to transplant patients with SADS. In this age of cost-effectiveness, it will be difficult to arrange third-party reimbursement for a hematopoietic stem cell transplant that may lead to medical charges of between $100,000 and $200,000. However, the cost of standard medical care for patients with SADS is not trivial. Dialysis for an SLE patient with renal failure costs $40,000 per year, while the medical resources required to care for a patient with progressive multiple sclerosis may exceed $35,000 per year. Unique BMT regimen-related toxicities may occur, including intracranial hemorrhage in the SLE or rheumatoid arthritis patient who has vasculitis; acute neurologic decompensation in patients with multiple sclerosis, especially if the conditioning regimen contains neurotoxic agents that cross a compromised blood-brain barrier; respiratory failure in patients with myasthenia gravis; and increased renal or pulmonary toxicity in patients with scleroderma and parenchymal fibrosis. Scleroderma-associated gastrointestinal dysmotility and bacterial overgrowth may also lead to greater fungal and bacterial infections [76]. BMT is currently considered appropriate therapy for patients with chronic-phase Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) and indolent lymphomas who otherwise have a relatively long life expectancy of 5 and 10 years, respectively. The roughly similar long survival but greater functional impairment of patients with SADS may justify consideration of immune ablation and hematopoietic stem cell rescue.