Search

Background: This study assessed the contribution of intracorporeal (IC) and extracorporeal clearance (EC) of furosemide in patients with septic acute kidney injury (AKI), and the relationship between plasma concentrations and urine volume., Methods: Prospective cohort observational study of 15 patients with septic AKI undergoing continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) divided according to urine volume (< 500 ml/12 h, Oliguria group, n = 5; > 500 ml/12 h, Diuresis group, n = 10) during continuous infusion of furosemide (120 mg/12 h) at steady-state condition. Plasma and effluent furosemide concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-mass spectrometry every 12 h for 48 h., Results: Furosemide plasma concentrations and total body clearance (TBC) were 6.14 mg/l and 22.1 ml/min for the Oliguria group, and 2.63 mg/l and 54.4 ml/min for the Diuresis group, respectively (p < 0.05). When urine volume was < 500 ml/24 h, the furosemide plasma concentrations peaked at the potentially toxic value of 13.0 mg/l. Furosemide EC was not relevant for the Diuresis group, but it represented 18% of TBC for the Oliguria group. Furosemide plasma concentrations correlated positively with dose infusion for both groups (r = 0.728 and 0.685, p < 0.05), and negatively with urine volume only for the Diuresis (r = - 0.578, p < 0.01) but not for the Oliguria group (r = - 0.089, p = 0.715)., Conclusions: For patients with urine volume > 500 ml/12 h continuous infusion of furosemide up to 480 mg/24 h leads to increasing urine volume, which can predict furosemide plasma levels within its safety range. When the urine volume is lower, the furosemide plasma levels are increased beyond any further diuretic efficacy.

Background: The novel iron-based phosphate binder sucroferric oxyhydroxide is being investigated for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia. Patients with chronic kidney disease often have multiple comorbidities that may necessitate the daily use of several types of medication. Therefore, the potential pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions between sucroferric oxyhydroxide and selected drugs commonly taken by dialysis patients were investigated., Methods: Five Phase I, single-center, open-label, randomized, three-period crossover studies in healthy volunteers investigated the effect of a single dose of sucroferric oxyhydroxide 1 g (based on iron content) on the pharmacokinetics of losartan 100 mg, furosemide 40 mg, omeprazole 40 mg, digoxin 0.5 mg and warfarin 10 mg. Pharmacokinetic parameters [including area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 extrapolated to infinite time (AUC0-∞) and from 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24)] for these drugs were determined: alone in the presence of food; with sucroferric oxyhydroxide in the presence of food; 2 h after food and sucroferric oxyhydroxide administration., Results: Systemic exposure based on AUC0-∞ for all drugs, and AUC0-24 for all drugs except omeprazole (for which AUC 0-8 h was measured), was unaffected to a clinically significant extent by the presence of sucroferric oxyhydroxide, irrespective of whether sucroferric oxyhydroxide was administered with the drug or 2 h earlier., Conclusions: There is a low risk of drug-drug interactions between sucroferric oxyhydroxide and losartan, furosemide, digoxin and warfarin. There is also a low risk of drug-drug interaction with omeprazole (based on AUC0-∞ values). Therefore, sucroferric oxyhydroxide may be administered concomitantly without the need to adjust the dosage regimens of these drugs.

Purpose: To compare the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tolvaptan in Caucasian and Japanese healthy male subjects under fasting and non-fasting conditions., Methods: This was a single-center, parallel-group, randomized, open-label, three-period crossover trial of single oral doses of tolvaptan 30 mg under fasting and non-fasting [a high-fat, high-calorie meal (HFM) or Japanese standard meal] conditions in 25 healthy male Caucasian subjects and 24 healthy male Japanese subjects. Pharmacodynamic endpoints were urine volume and fluid balance for 0 to 24 h postdose., Results: In the fasted state, the plasma tolvaptan C(max) and AUC(∞) geometric mean ratios (90 % confidence interval) were 1.105 (0.845-1.444) and 1.145 (0.843-1.554) for Japanese compared to Caucasian subjects. A HFM increased the C(max) and AUC(∞) values by about 1.15-fold in both Japanese and Caucasian subjects.. Twenty-four-hour urine volumes paralleled pharmacokinetic changes, but the increases were not clinically significant. Fluid balance in the Japanese men was 1.4- to 2.0-fold more negative than that in the Caucasian men., Conclusion: Tolvaptan pharmacokinetics is not clinically significantly affected by race. Body weight is a factor that affects exposure. Tolvaptan can be administered with or without food.

Purpose: Tolvaptan is a selective vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist that can be given orally once daily for treatment of clinically significant hypervolemic and euvolemic hyponatremia (US and Europe) or extracellular volume expansion despite taking other diuretics (Japan). In vitro studies indicated that tolvaptan was a CYP3A4 substrate., Methods: A single-center, randomized, crossover trial of 60-mg tolvaptan with 240 mL of water or with 240 mL of reconstituted grapefruit juice (washout period of 72 h between doses) was conducted in 20 healthy subjects. Blood samples for tolvaptan plasma concentrations were obtained for 48 h postdose., Results: All subjects completed the trial. Following co-administration with grapefruit juice, tolvaptan concentrations were elevated compared with tolvaptan alone for only 16 h postdose; consequently, the mean elimination half-life of tolvaptan was unchanged, 5.7 vs 5.1 h respectively. The mean maximal plasma concentration (C(max)) and the area under the curve (AUC(∞)) of tolvaptan were increased 1.86- and 1.56-fold respectively when co-administered with grapefruit juice., Conclusions: It appears that grapefruit juice increases the bioavailability of tolvaptan, but does not affect its systemic elimination. The adverse event profile was consistent with the aquaretic effect of tolvaptan as urinary frequency, thirst, and dry mouth were the most frequently reported events.

Objective: To study the influence of the lipase inhibitor orlistat on the pharmacokinetics of the antihypertensive drugs atenolol, furosemide, captopril and nifedipine., Methods: Four open-label, crossover studies were performed on six to eight healthy male volunteers. Orlistat was given in doses of 50 mg 3 times daily mid-meal for 7 (nifedipine and captopril) or 8 days (atenolol and furosemide). The four antihypertensive drugs (atenolol 100-mg tablet, furosemide 40-mg tablet, captopril 50-mg tablet and nifedipine 20-mg slow-release tablet) were administered in single doses twice, once before and once together, with orlistat at the end of the orlistat treatment period., Results: The plasma concentration time profiles and the pharmacokinetic parameters estimated for these drugs were in the expected range, except for furosemide, whose bioavailability was lower than reported in the literature. This was probably due to the fact that furosemide was given during a meal. There were minor, but statistically significant, differences in one of the pharmacokinetic parameters of furosemide and nifedipine (no difference for captopril and atenolol) when these drugs were given alone and in combination with orlistat: the half-life of furosemide was slightly longer, the time to peak plasma concentrations of nifedipine was slightly longer. None of these are considered to be clinically significant changes., Conclusions: The lipase inhibitor orlistat given 50 mg 3 times daily does not alter the pharmacokinetics of atenolol, furosemide, nifedipine and captopril to a clinically significant extent.

The elimination of diuretics and methylxanthines is considerably slower in the neonate than in the adult. Dose guidelines, especially during long term maintenance, must be adjusted to account for this slower drug elimination. Pharmacokinetic studies and the requisite pharmacologic evaluation on diuretics such as hydrochlorothiazide, spironolactone, ethacrynic acid and others should be done. Furosemide undergoes biotransformation in the newborn producing an acid metabolite and a glucuronide conjugate. Methylxanthines are effective in the treatment of neonatal apnea. Plasma elimination of theophylline is exceedingly slow, more so with caffeine. Decreased elimination is partly explained by decreased oxidative biotransformation. Caffeine is excreted in the urine of the newborn mainly unchanged (85%) in contrast to the adult where caffeine is a minor portion of urinary excretion (2%). Theophylline is methylated to caffeine and may possibly exert additive pharmacologic effects.

The absorption of piretanide was investigated after placing the drug in the stomach, duodenum and ascending colon under visual control. The relative amounts absorbed and the rates of absorption were estimated from the area under the curve and the total mean time, respectively. Similar amounts of piretanide were absorbed and at almost the same rate after placement in the stomach and duodenum; the area under the curve for the stomach was 250 ng h/ml and for the duodenum 243 ng h/ml, the mean absorption times being 1.97 h and 1.51 h respectively. A marked difference was observed in the rate of from the ascending colon; the area amounted to 66 ng h/ml and the mean time to 3.99 h. Although area values for the colon were significantly different from those observed with the stomach and duodenum, it must be emphasised that the amount absorbed depends on the time the drug is in contact with the absorbing surface. There is discussion of whether the differences in absorption between the duodenum and colon can be explained by the physico-chemical properties of the drug alone, or whether the results reflect a saturable transport mechanism.

The protein binding of piretanide was assessed by continuous ultrafiltration of sera from six normal subjects and seven uraemic subjects (samples taken immediately pre-dialysis). Throughout the range of piretanide concentrations studied (0.5-4.5mM), the mean protein binding for uraemic serum was less than that for normal serum. This difference was significant (p less than 0.05) at piretanide concentrations of 1.5 mM and above, but not at 1mM where mean protein binding for uraemic serum was 88.1% compared to 94.2% for normal serum. Analysis of piretanide protein binding characteristics using the Rosenthal plot showed no significant differences between uraemic and normal serum with respect to primary or secondary binding sites. Parallel assessment by the Scatchard method suggests, as expected, that albumin is the principle protein moiety responsible for binding piretanide.

Piretanide 60 mg was administered intravenously over 30 min to 15 men with different degrees of renal failure. The mean piretanide serum concentration at the end of the infusion period was 5.72 +/- 1.51 micrograms/ml. Serum piretanide concentration-time curves declined biexponentially and 24 hours after medication the serum level had fallen to less than twice the detection limit. The terminal half-life ranged from 1.63 to 3.44 h. A relationship to creatinine clearance was not demonstrable. The mean metabolic clearance of piretanide was 107.7 +/- 47.6 ml/min/1.73 m2 body surface area and was the same as that reported for healthy subjects. The renal clearance of piretanide ranged from 3.33 to 43.9 ml/min/1.73 m2 body surface area and very closely correlated with the creatinine clearance (p less than 0.01). Its renal clearance depended principally on active secretion of the drug into the tubule, and glomerular filtration appeared unimportant. There was a close relationship between the amount of piretanide excreted in the urine and the creatinine clearance. Because the diuretic effect of piretanide depends on the concentration of the drug in the tubule, the observed correlation might be of use in evaluating the appropriate dosage of piretanide in patients with renal failure. The present data suggest that single daily doses of piretanide will not result in accumulation, even when high doses are administered to patients with advanced renal failure.