Search

Background: It is widely hypothesized that improvement in transitions of care will reduce unplanned hospital readmissions. However, the association between the Care Transitions Measure, the national quality metric for transitions of care and readmission risk, has not been established., Objective: We aimed to determine the association between the Care Transition Measure and readmission., Design: This was a single-center, prospective cohort study., Participants: Convenience sample of 2,963 patients enrolled in the "Bridging the Divides" program, a longitudinal care management program for patients with coronary revascularization, from 2013 to 2014. Of these, 1594 (54 %) patients completed a post-discharge Care Transition Measure questionnaire., Intervention: Care Transition Measure scores were collected by trained research staff blinded to study hypothesis, by telephone, within 30 days of discharge. Higher Care Transition Measure scores reflect a higher quality transition of care., Main Measures: 30-day readmission was measured., Key Results: Of the1594 patients that completed the Care Transition Measure survey, 1216 (76 %) received percutaneous coronary intervention and 378 (24 %) received coronary artery bypass grafting. Mean Care Transition Measure scores were significantly lower among patients who had a prior admission (77.2 vs. 82.1, p < 0.001) and those with ≥ 5 comorbidities (77 vs. 82.6 vs. 81.6, p < 0.001). Mean scores were significantly lower among patients who were readmitted within the percutaneous coronary intervention subgroup (73 vs. 80.9, p < 0.001) and the total study population (74.6 vs. 81.1, p < 0.001) compared to those who were not readmitted. This was not the case in the coronary artery bypass grafting subgroup (78.5 vs. 81.7, p = 0.29). After multivariable adjustment, every ten-point increase in the Care Transition Measure score was associated with a 14 % reduction in readmission risk (adjusted odds ratio 0.86, 95 % CI 0.78-0.95)., Conclusions: The Care Transition Measure is strongly associated with readmissions, which strengthens its validity. However, its association with patient variables linked with readmission and its inconsistent association with readmission across clinical groups raises concerns that scores may be influenced by patient characteristics., Competing Interests: Compliance with ethical standards Funders The project described was supported by Grant Number 1C1CMS331027 from the Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. The content of this presentation are solely the responsibility of the authors and have not been approved by the Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Dr. Goldstein and Dr. Hicks are supported by and Institutional Development Award (IDeA) from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under grant number U54-GM104941 (PI: Binder-Macleod). The above funding organizations had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication. Conflict of Interest The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Although racial and ethnic minorities are more likely to be involved with the criminal justice system than whites in the U.S.A., critical scientific gaps exist in our understanding of the relationship between the criminal justice system and the persistence of racial/ethnic health disparities. Individuals engaged with the criminal justice system are at risk for poor health outcomes. Furthermore, criminal justice involvement may have direct or indirect effects on health and health care. Racial/ethnic health disparities may be exacerbated or mitigated at several stages of the criminal justice system. Understanding and addressing the health of individuals involved in the criminal justice system is one component of a comprehensive strategy to reduce population health disparities and improve the health of our urban communities.

Background: Racial/ethnic disparities exist in the prevalence and outcomes of diabetes and hypertension in the U.S. A better understanding of the health beliefs and experiences of non-Hispanic Blacks and Latinos with these diseases could help to improve their care outcomes., Methods: We conducted eight focus groups stratified by participants' race/ethnicity, with 34 non-Hispanic Blacks and Latinos receiving care for diabetes and/or hypertension in one of 7 community health centers in Boston. Focus groups were designed to determine participants' levels of understanding about their chronic illness, assess their barriers to the management of their illness, and inquire about interventions they considered may help achieve better health outcomes., Results: Among both groups of participants, nutrition (traditional diets), genetics and environmental stress (e.g. neighborhood crime and poor conditions) were described as primary contributors to diabetes and hypertension. Unhealthy diets were reported as being a major barrier to disease management. Participants also believed that they would benefit from attending groups on management and education for their conditions that include creative ways to adopt healthy foods that complement their ethnic diets, exercise opportunities, and advice on how to prevent disease manifestation among family members., Conclusions: Interactive discussion groups focused on lifestyle modification and disease management should be created for patients to learn more about their diseases. Future research evaluating the effectiveness of interactive diabetes and hypertension groups that apply patient racial/ethnic traditions should be considered.

Background: Significant racial and ethnic differences along several dimensions of patients'experiences with hospital care have been previously documented. However, the relationship between these differences and possible differences in processes of care has not been well described., Methods: We conducted focus groups with 37 black and Hispanic men and women who had recently been discharged from either medical or obstetrical services at an urban academic medical center to assess which dimensions of these patients' experiences with care were most important in determining overall levels of satisfaction., Results: Differences were found between Hispanics and blacks in the factors that influence their overall positive and negative experiences. Participants identified two themes that influence experiences with hospital care that are not commonly examined in many patient satisfaction instruments: availability and quality of translators, and attitudes of social workers and nursing staff., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that hospitals should pursue hiring a culturally diverse work force and should collect racial and ethnically specific data about satisfaction with care including satisfaction with availability of social workers and interpreters.

Background: Completing pre-transplant evaluations may be a greater barrier to renal transplantation for blacks with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) than for whites., Objective: To determine whether social support networks facilitate completing the pre-transplant evaluation and reduce racial disparities in this aspect of care., Design, Setting, and Participants: We surveyed 742 black and white ESRD patients in four regional networks 9 months after they initiated dialysis in 1996 and 1997. Patients reported instrumental support networks (number of friends or family to help with daily activities), emotional support networks (number of friends or family available for counsel on personal problems) and dialysis center support (support from dialysis center staff and patients). The completion of pre-transplant evaluations, including preoperative risk stratification and testing, was determined by medical record reviews., Outcome Measurement: Complete renal pre-transplant evaluations., Results: Compared to patients with low levels of instrumental support, those with high levels were more likely to have complete evaluations (25% versus 46%, respectively, p < .001). In adjusted analyses, high levels of instrumental support were associated with higher rates of complete evaluations among black women (p < .05), white women (p < .05), and white men (p < .05), but not black men. Among black men, but not other groups, private insurance was a significant predictor of complete evaluations., Conclusions: Instrumental support networks may facilitate completing renal pre-transplant evaluations. Clinical interventions that supplement instrumental support should be evaluated to improve access to renal transplantation. Access to supplemental insurance may also promote complete evaluations for black patients.

Background: We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial to examine the effectiveness of computerized decision support (CDS) designed to improve hypertension care and outcomes in a racially diverse sample of primary care patients., Methods: We randomized 2,027 adult patients receiving hypertension care in 14 primary care practices to either 18 months of their physicians receiving CDS for each hypertensive patient or to usual care without computerized support for the control group. We assessed prescribing of guideline-recommended drug therapy and levels of blood pressure control for patients in each group and examined if the effects of the intervention differed by patients' race/ethnicity using interaction terms., Measurements and Main Results: Rates of blood pressure control were 42% at baseline and 46% at the outcome visit with no significant differences between groups. After adjustment for patients' demographic and clinical characteristics, number of prior visits, and levels of baseline blood pressure control, there were no differences between intervention groups in the odds of outcome blood pressure control. The use of CDS to providers significantly improved Joint National Committee (JNC) guideline adherent medication prescribing compared to usual care (7% versus 5%, P < 0.001); the effects of the intervention remained after multivariable adjustment (odds ratio [OR] 1.39 [CI, 1.13-1.72]) and the effects of the intervention did not differ by patients' race and ethnicity., Conclusions: CDS improved appropriate medication prescribing with no improvement in disparities in care and overall blood pressure control. Future work focusing on improvement of these interventions and the study of other practical interventions to reduce disparities in hypertension-related outcomes is needed.