Search

Background: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) after esophagectomy and pre-existing cardiac substrate., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 212 consecutive patients from between July 2010 and December 2022 who were scheduled to undergo esophagectomy for esophageal cancer without previous history of atrial fibrillation. All the patients underwent both echocardiography and contrast-enhanced multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT)., Results: POAF occurred in 49 patients (23.1%). Multivariable logistic analysis demonstrated that independent predictors for POAF were age [OR; 1.06 (1.01-1.10), P < 0.01), three-field lymph node dissection [OR; 2.55 (1.25-5.23), P < 0.01), left atrial dilatation (> 35 mm) assessment by echocardiography [OR; 3.05 (1.49-6.25), P < 0.01) and common left pulmonary vein [OR; 3.03 (1.44-6.39), P < 0.01). The correlation coefficient was high for left atrial dimensions assessed by echocardiography and MDCT (r = 0.91, P < 0.01). Combination of left atrial dilatation by echocardiography and common left pulmonary vein had high odds ratio [OR; 8.10 (2.62-25.96), P < 0.01). Instead of echocardiographic assessment, combination of left atrial enlargement (> 35 mm) assessed by MDCT and common left pulmonary vein also showed high odds ratio for POAF [OR; 11.23 [2.19-57.63], P < 0.01)., Conclusion: Incidence of POAF after esophagectomy was related to both left atrial enlargement and common left pulmonary vein assessed by preoperative MDCT. Additional analysis of atrial size and pulmonary vein variation would facilitate preoperative assessment of the risk of POAF, but future studies must ascertain therapeutic strategy., (© 2023. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to The Japan Esophageal Society.)

Background: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) for morbid obesity may improve gut microbiota balance and decrease chronic inflammation. This study examines the changes in gut microbiota and immune environment, including mucosal-associated invariant T cells (MAIT cells) and regulatory T cells (Treg cells) caused by LSG., Methods: Ten morbidly obese patients underwent LSG at our institution between December 2018 and March 2020. Flow cytometry for Th1/Th2/Th17 cells, Treg cells and MAIT cells in peripheral blood and colonic mucosa and 16S rRNA analysis of gut microbiota were performed preoperatively and then 12 months postoperatively., Results: Twelve months after LSG, the median percent total weight loss was 30.3% and the median percent excess weight loss was 66.9%. According to laboratory data, adiponectin increased, leptin decreased, and chronic inflammation improved after LSG. In the gut microbiota, Bacteroidetes and Fusobacteria increased after LSG, and indices of alpha diversity increased after LSG. In colonic mucosa, the frequency of MAIT cells increased after LSG. In peripheral blood, the frequency of Th1 cells and effector Treg cells decreased after LSG., Conclusions: After LSG for morbid obesity, improvement in chronic inflammation in obesity is suggested by change in the constituent bacterial species, increase in the diversity of gut microbiota, increase in MAIT cells in the colonic mucosa, and decrease in effector Treg cells in the peripheral blood., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a standard treatment for early gastric cancers (EGCs), but because of the obscured view and difficulty in submucosal lifting it is time consuming and poses high risk of perforation and bleeding in large lesions. In endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection (ESTD) technique, good visualization of the submucosal layer can be achieved in the tunnel, it is, therefore, easy to discern the muscularis propria and visualize the vessels in the submucosal area. This study aims to evaluate the technical feasibility, efficacy, and safety of ESTD in comparison with conventional ESD (cESD) technique for treatment of EGCs., Methods: This is a single-center retrospective study of 799 consecutive patients with EGCs who underwent ESD. ESTD (n = 141) were performed between 2015 and 2018 and cESD (n = 658) were performed between 2003 and 2015. Using propensity scores to strictly balance the significant variables, we compared treatment outcomes., Results: After matching, we enrolled 444 patients (n = 111 in ESTD group, n = 333 in cESD group). The resection speeds for lesions of the ESTD were faster than those of cESD (19.3 mm 2 /min versus 17.7 mm 2 /min, P = 0.009). There was no need to use additional countertraction by clip-with-line technique or snare for the submucosal dissection in the ESTD procedure. The incidence of perforation was significantly higher in the cESD group (6.0%) than in the ESTD group (0.9%) (P = 0.035). Among 799 patients, four patients who received non-curative ESD had recurrence of gastric cancer., Conclusion: ESTD technique is a safe and feasible treatment procedure for EGCs. It presents many theoretical advantages and may have definite benefits over cESD. ESTD may, therefore, be considered as the standard endoscopic treatment for EGCs.