Search

Use of GnRH antagonists in IVF stimulation protocols shortens controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) and reduces the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). However, profound reduction in LH levels has been associated with use of GnRH antagonists. This study aims to determine if LH suppression during GnRH antagonist cycles results in poorer IVF outcomes. This was a prospective pilot longitudinal study where serum LH levels were measured on day 2/3 of the menstrual cycle before COH, 1/2 days following institution of GnRH antagonist and at the day of ovulation trigger. A threshold of LH <0.5 IU/L was used to define profound LH suppression. Data on IVF outcomes was collected. Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate risk factors associated with LH suppression following GnRH antagonist IVF treatment. Ninety-one eligible women were recruited. Women underwent a standard antagonist cycle with Puregon 200u and Ganirelix. No participant had LH <0.5 IU/L prior to GnRH antagonist treatment, and 27 participants (29.7%) had significant LH suppression at either time point. Predictors of profound LH suppression following GnRH antagonist treatment identified (P < 0.20) were age (OR = 0.80, P = 0.013), no previous ovulation induction (OR = 0.26, P = 0.033) and previous GnRH antagonist IVF cycle (OR = 4.32, P = 0.125). Numbers of oocytes, embryos and ongoing pregnancy rates at 12 weeks gestation in patients with and without LH suppression did not differ significantly. We found associations between clinical characteristics and risk of profound LH suppression in women undergoing GnRH antagonist IVF cycles, but no significant differences in IVF and pregnancy outcomes between women with and without significant LH suppression., (© 2021. Society for Reproductive Investigation.)

Timolol maleate (TM) has been used for many years for the reduction of intraocular pressure (IOP) in glaucoma patients. However, the topical mode of administration (eyedrops) is far from optimal because of the issues of low bioavailability, high drug wastage, and lack of patient compliance. Suboptimal control of the IOP leads to disease progression and eventually to blindness. Ideally, TM is delivered to the patient so that its action is both localized and sustained for 3 months or more. In this work, we developed a subconjunctival TM microfilm for sustained, long-term delivery of TM to the eyes, using the biodegradable elastomer poly(lactide-co-caprolactone) (PLC). The copolymer is biocompatible and has flexibility and mechanical characteristics suitable for a patient-acceptable implant. Controlling the release of TM for 3 months is challenging, and this work describes how, by using a combination of multilayering and blending with poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) copolymers, we were able to develop a TM-incorporated biodegradable film that can deliver TM at a therapeutic dose for 90 days in vitro. The data was further confirmed in a diseased primate model, with sustained IOP-lowering effects for 5 months with a single implant, with acceptable biocompatibility and partial degradation.