1. Optimum combined MET according to tolerability with efficacy, Silodosin Tadalafil versus Silodosin Vardenafil for distal ureteric stone: a prospective, double blinded, randomized clinical trial.
- Author
-
Diab T, Noah K, Farag M, and Shaher H
- Subjects
- Humans, Double-Blind Method, Male, Female, Prospective Studies, Middle Aged, Adult, Treatment Outcome, Urological Agents therapeutic use, Urological Agents administration & dosage, Urological Agents adverse effects, Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors therapeutic use, Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors administration & dosage, Ureteral Calculi drug therapy, Tadalafil therapeutic use, Tadalafil administration & dosage, Vardenafil Dihydrochloride therapeutic use, Vardenafil Dihydrochloride administration & dosage, Drug Therapy, Combination, Indoles therapeutic use, Indoles adverse effects, Indoles administration & dosage
- Abstract
Objectives: To determine the optimum combination therapy of Silodosin-Tadalafil versus Silodosin-Vardenafil in terms of both tolerability and efficacy for the management of distal ureteric stones., Methods: This prospective, double blinded, randomized clinical trial included 140 patients with distal ureteric stones, randomized into two groups: Group I (n = 67) received Silodosin 8 mg once daily combined with Tadalafil 5 mg once daily, and Group II (n = 68) received Silodosin 8 mg once daily combined with Vardenafil 10 mg once daily. The primary outcome was the tolerability of the combination therapies, assessed through the incidence of adverse events. Secondary outcomes included stone expulsion rate, expulsion time, and the need for analgesics., Results: Both combination therapies demonstrated similar efficacy, with no significant differences in stone expulsion rate (70.1% vs. 67.6%, P = 0.754), expulsion time (19 ± 3 days for both groups, P = 0.793), and analgesic requirements (P > 0.05). However, the Silodosin-Tadalafil combination showed a significantly lower occurrence of adverse events, with notable differences in headache (23.9% vs. 57.4%, P < 0.001), dizziness (32.8% vs. 60.3%, P = 0.001), and gastrointestinal upset (9% vs. 66.2%, P < 0.001), and other adverse effects. The overall occurrence of any adverse event was significantly lower in the Silodosin-Tadalafil group (88.1% vs. 98.5%, P = 0.017)., Conclusions: Both Silodosin-Tadalafil and Silodosin-Vardenafil therapies are effective in managing distal ureteric stones. However, the Silodosin-Tadalafil combination is associated with a significantly lower incidence of adverse events, making it a more tolerable option for patients., Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Ethics approval: The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Egypt (Approval code: RC 24-2-2023). Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.)
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF