1. Comparison of proton-based definitive chemoradiotherapy and surgery-based therapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a multi-center retrospective Japanese cohort study.
- Author
-
Ogawa K, Ishikawa H, Toyozumi T, Noma K, Kono K, Hojo H, Tamamura H, Azami Y, Ishida T, Nabeya Y, Iwata H, Araya M, Tokumaru S, Maruo K, Oda T, and Matsubara H
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Japan epidemiology, Retrospective Studies, Aged, Neoadjuvant Therapy methods, Neoadjuvant Therapy statistics & numerical data, Neoplasm Staging, Treatment Outcome, Propensity Score, East Asian People, Esophagectomy methods, Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma therapy, Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma surgery, Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma pathology, Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma mortality, Esophageal Neoplasms therapy, Esophageal Neoplasms mortality, Esophageal Neoplasms pathology, Chemoradiotherapy methods, Proton Therapy methods
- Abstract
Background: Proton-based, definitive chemoradiotherapy (P-CRT) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) previously showed comparable survival outcomes with the surgery-based therapy, i.e., neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy (NAC-S), in a single-institutional study. This study aimed to validate this message in a Japanese multicenter study., Methods: Eleven Japanese esophageal cancer specialty hospitals have participated. A total of 518 cases with clinical Stage I-IVA ESCC between 2010 and 2019, including 168 P-CRT and 350 NAC-S patients, were enrolled and long-term outcomes were evaluated. Propensity-score weighting analyses with overlap weighting for confounding adjustment were used., Results: The 3-year overall survival (OS) of the P-CRT group was equivalent to the NAC-S group (74.8% vs. 72.7%, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61-1.25). Although, the 3-year P-CRT group progression-free survival (PFS) was inferior to the NAC-S group (51.4% vs. 59.6%, HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.04-1.85), the progression P-CRT group cases showed better survival than the NAC-S group (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.38-0.88), largely because of salvage surgery or endoscopic submucosal dissection for local progression. The survival advantage of P-CRT over NAC-S was more pronounced in the cT1-2 (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.29-1.26) and cStage I-II (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.24-1.07) subgroups, although this trend was not evident in other populations, such as cT3-4 and cStage III-IVA., Conclusions: Proton-based CRT for ESCC showed equivalent OS to surgery-based therapy. Especially for patients with cT1-2 and cStage I-II disease, proton-based CRT has the potential to serve as a first-line treatment., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to The Author(s) under exclusive licence to The Japan Esophageal Society.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF