Search

Background: Rheumatology in Germany is facing major challenges. The need for rheumatological care is increasing and can no longer be met in some regions for capacity reasons. Too many people with an inflammatory rheumatic disease (IRD) have to forego appropriate care or receive it too late. The 4th new edition of the memorandum of the German Society for Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology (DGRh) provides information on rheumatological care in Germany. It was produced under the leadership of the DGRh together with the Professional Association of German Rheumatologists (BDRh), the Association of Acute Rheumatology Clinics (VRA), the German Rheumatism League (DRL) and the German Rheumatism Research Center (DRFZ)., Methods: The memorandum describes the current state and development of the following areas: number of people with IRD, outpatient, inpatient and rehabilitative care structures, number of specialists in rheumatology, education and training, quality of care, health economic aspects and digital care concepts. Proposals for health policy measures to safeguard rheumatological care are presented., Results: Prevalence: approximately 1.8 million adults in Germany have an IRD. The prevalence is increasing, due to changes in the demographic structure of the population, improved diagnostics, treatment and longer survival. Care structures: outpatient specialist care (ASV) for rheumatic diseases is developing as a cross-sectoral care model for hospital outpatient clinics and rheumatology practices. Hospitals have been able to be certified as rheumatology centers since 2020, which enables structural developments. Specialists in rheumatology: as of 31 December 2023, there were 1164 specialists in rheumatology working in Germany. This included 715 physicians accredited to work in practices for national health assurance patients, 39% of whom were employees. In hospitals, 39% of doctors worked part-time. At least 2 rheumatology specialists per 100,000 adults are needed, i.e. around 1400, in order to provide adequate care. This means that there is a shortage of around 700 rheumatology specialists in the outpatient sector alone. Of all working specialists, 30% are currently aged 60 years old and over. Medical training: only 10 out of 38 (26%) state universities have an independent chair in rheumatology. In addition, 11 rheumatology departments are subordinate to a nonrheumatology chair. In the rheumatology-integration into student training (RISA) III study, only 16 out of 36 faculties fulfilled the recommended minimum number of compulsory hours of student rheumatology teaching. Continuing education in rheumatology: the annual postgraduate training qualifications do not cover the demand for rheumatology specialists, which is additionally increasing due to intensified workload, reduced capacities through retirement, and part-time work. Quality of care: since the introduction of highly effective medication patients with IRD have a much better chance of achieving remission of their disease. With early initiation of targeted therapy, the lives of many patients are hardly restricted at all: however, waiting times for a first rheumatological visit often last more than 3 months. Quality target is a first consultation within the first 6 weeks after the onset of symptoms. Models for early consultation, delegation of medical services, structured patient training and digital care concepts have been positively evaluated but are not covered financially., Costs: the total annual costs for inflammatory joint diseases alone amount to around 3 billion euros. The direct costs have significantly risen since the introduction of biologics, while the indirect costs for sick leave, disability and hospitalization have fallen., Conclusion: The core demands of this memorandum are a significant and sustainable increase in the number of further training positions in the outpatient and inpatient sector, the creation of chairs or at least independent departments for rheumatology at all universities and the further implementation of new and cross-sectoral forms of care. This will ensure modern needs-based rheumatological care for all patients in the future., (© 2024. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Rheumatologie und Klinische Immunologie e.V. (DGRh) Published by Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH. All rights reserved.)

Background: At least 1 comorbidity occurs in 80% of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In addition to cardiovascular comorbidities psychological comorbid conditions are common. The prevalence of depression and anxiety is higher in patients than in the general population. Screening for comorbidities is crucial. A shortage of outpatient specialist care barely allows resources for this. The implementation of team-based care holds the potential to improve the standard of care while simultaneously working against the shortage of care., Objective: The aim of the study was to examine the effects of care on the course of depression and anxiety in patients with seropositive RA and active disease., Material and Methods: A multicenter pragmatic randomized controlled trial was conducted over the course of 1 year with 224 patients. After baseline, five more visits followed. In the intervention group (IG), three were initially carried out by qualified rheumatological assistants. Depression, anxiety and patient satisfaction with outpatient care were looked at in detail., Results: In the IG the anxiety symptoms significantly improved over 12 months (p = 0.036). The proportions of patients with anxiety also significantly changed in the IG (p < 0.001), while there was no change in the control group between baseline and month 12. The values of the depression scale did not differ significantly (p = 0.866). In terms of the information dimension of the satisfaction questionnaire, patients in the IG felt significantly better informed after 6 months (p = 0.013) and 12 months (p = 0.003)., Conclusion: A positive effect of team-based care on the course of depression and anxiety in patients with seropositive RA and active disease could be shown., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: With the introduction of biologics the treatment landscape for patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has rapidly expanded; however, according to German and European treatment guidelines the use of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD) is only indicated after insufficient response under methotrexate (MTX) doses of at least 20 mg/week (first-line treatment). The aim of the study was to analyze the guideline compliance of MTX prescription in the outpatient sector prior to treatment with biologics., Material and Methods: Claims data from the AOK Lower Saxony from 2013 to 2016 were provided for all insured patients with a diagnosis of RA and bDMARD prescription during the study period. Within a patient-specific observational period of 180 days prior to the first bDMARD prescription, the maximum prescribed MTX dosage was examined., Results: Data from 90 incident and 315 prevalent RA patients were analyzed. A maximum MTX prescription of < 20 mg/week was observed in 60.0% of incident patients and in 67.0% of prevalent patients. Men had a higher mean MTX maximum dose (17.1 ± 4.8 mg) than women (14.9 ± 5.0 mg; p < 0.0001). Of the study population 29.6% received oral only prescriptions during the observational period. In 12.4% of patients a switch to parenteral administration was made., Discussion: Targeted use of the full spectrum of therapies provided prior to initiation of bDMARD treatment may contribute to cost-effective RA care. This study showed indications for potential deficits in outpatient MTX prescription practice and can raise awareness for efficient treatment., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

In the design of long-term care systems, preferences can serve as an essential indication to better tailor services to the needs, wishes and expectations of its consumers. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize and synthesize available evidence on long-term care preferences that have been elicited by quantitative stated-preference methods. The databases PubMed and Web of Science were searched for the period 2000 to 2020 with an extensive set of search terms. Two independent researchers judged the eligibility of studies. The final number of included studies was 66, conducted in 19 different countries. Studies were systematized according to their content focus as well as the survey method used. Irrespective of the heterogeneity of studies with respect to research focus, study population, sample size and study design, some consistent findings emerged. When presented with a set of long-term care options, the majority of study participants preferred to "age in place" and make use of informal or home-based care. With increasing severity of physical and cognitive impairments, preferences shifted toward the exclusive use of formal care. Next to the severity of care needs, the influence on preferences of a range of other independent variables such as income, family status and education were tested; however, none showed consistent effects across all studies. The inclusion of choice-based elicitation techniques provides an impression of how studies operationalized long-term care and measured preferences. Future research should investigate how preferences might change over time and generations as well as people's willingness and realistic capabilities of providing care., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interestThe authors declare that there is no conflict of interest., (© The Author(s) 2022.)

Background: To ensure specialized care of patients with rare diseases, numerous centres for rare diseases were funded over the past few years. The reimbursement of patients' ambulatory care in hospitals, however, is characterized by a plurality of forms of care and payment. There is some evidence of deficits in the reimbursement of care of patients suffering from a rare disease from studies on individual rare diseases., Objectives: To investigate current forms of care provision and reimbursement of centres for rare diseases and to develop future approaches for sustainable compensation., Materials and Methods: Initially, centres for rare diseases in Germany were asked to provide information about their forms of care and reimbursement using questionnaires. Subsequently, two focus group interviews and one expert interview with representatives from centres for rare diseases, health insurance, health politics and patients were conducted to discuss current and future meritocratic forms of care provision and reimbursement. The data were evaluated using content analysis., Results and Conclusions: Thirty-nine centres for rare diseases participated in the questionnaire survey. Of those, 38% receive a flat fee/allowance for university outpatient departments, the amount of which varies notably, and 41% obtain a mixed payment comprising an allowance for university outpatient departments and other forms of reimbursement. An under-recovery of costs in centres for rare diseases and its impact on patient care were mentioned in the interviews. In this context, a need to further develop forms of care provision and reimbursement has been identified. Participants prefer a special flat fee/allowance for rare diseases that covers the time-consuming care for patients with rare diseases., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Germany faces various socio-political challenges due to its ongoing ageing population. Significant increases in social security contributions are widely expected. The impact of ageing on healthcare expenditure is a controversial issue. Experts agree that costs for end-of-life care account for a significant part of total healthcare expenditures. For a meaningful forecast, detailed information on healthcare costs differentiated by survivors and decedents is necessary. Extensive data are hardly available for Germany. The aim of the analysis was therefore to describe healthcare costs in the statutory health insurance., Methods: The basis for the calculation is billing data from the statutory health insurance "AOK Niedersachsen" (Lower Saxony). Persons who survived or died in 2017 were included in the analysis. Average costs were standardised., Results: The data of 2.46 million survivors and 34,307 decedents were analysed. The average annual healthcare costs were 2756 € for survivors and 21,830 € for decedents in the last year of life. The average healthcare costs for survivors increase with age whereas costs for decedents are highest in younger age groups and decline with increasing age. A detailed analysis of end-of-life costs shows an exponential increase of costs in the last three years of life with the highest costs in the quarter before death (10,577 €)., Discussion: The analysis gives a detailed overview on the structure of healthcare expenditure in the statutory health insurance and can serve as a basis for future forecasts regarding healthcare expenditure., (© 2021. Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Background: A central information portal on rare diseases (ZIPSE) has been conceptualized and implemented that allows patients, relatives and health care professionals to access quality-assured information. For this purpose, quality criteria have been developed specifically for rare diseases. At the same time, the information basis should take into account the specific needs of those interested., Objectives: The needs of patients and relatives regarding online-based information are analyzed. Based on this, we examined to what extent the information basis, which is available according to the ZIPSE quality criteria, can cover these needs. If necessary, measures have to be developed to ensure quality- as well as needs-oriented information management., Materials and Methods: Qualitative interviews with patients and relatives were conducted, which were then evaluated using content analysis. Subsequently, a quantitative evaluation of the information on rare diseases in the portal was made. The research addresses how many websites do not fulfil the quality criteria, from which group of provider these websites originate and which criteria are not fulfilled. This is followed by a comparison of the quantitative and qualitative results., Results and Conclusions: When looking for information on the Internet, the websites of self-help groups represent a significant source. These are perceived as very trustworthy and in the later course of the disease, offer detailed information on important information areas. Information websites from self-help groups, however, often do not meet quality requirements. Therefore, a transparent representation is made regarding the quality of the ZIPSE information pages. Pages that are not quality-assured can be actively requested, but will be clearly identified.

Claims data have proven useful for carrying out cost-of-illness studies. To avoid overestimating disease-related costs, only those costs that are related to a specific disease should be considered. The present study demonstrates two basic approaches for identifying disease-related costs. Using the example of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), the advantages and drawbacks of expert-based approaches and those based on control groups are compared. Anonymized data from the "Techniker Krankenkasse" for 2008 were available for the study. The study population encompassed all ADHD patients and a control group that was five times bigger. Additionally, a systematic literature review was carried out on 65 relevant studies. Compared with the control group, disease-related costs were EUR 2,902 per ADHD patient on average. However, using the expert-based approach, costs were established to be EUR 923 lower. This is mainly because a comparison with an appropriate control group incorporates all costs for possible comorbidities and concomitant diseases. Both approaches have specific advantages and drawbacks, and when planning studies the respective limitations need to be considered.

Methotrexate (MTX) is the most important disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) and is recommended by national and international guidelines as the first choice for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Recent studies reporting prescription data of MTX captured only patients who were treated by rheumatologists. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to analyse several aspects of the prescription of MTX based on claims data. Outpatient and inpatient diagnoses as well as prescription data was available for 9579 RA patients for the years 2005-2008. Of the patients 45% were treated exclusively with parenteral MTX, 8% were treated exclusively with oral MTX and 48% switched between both forms of application. The average weekly dosage presribed in 70% of the patients was between 10 and 25 mg. The most common DMARD combination was MTX plus leflunomide with 16%. In 16% RA patients were treated with a combination of MTX and TNF-α inhibitors. Glucocorticoids were prescribed temporarily in 81% together with MTX and supplementation with folic acid was given only in 65%. The results of this study provide important insights into the drug supply of MTX to RA patients in the German statutory health care sector. In particular, the high frequency of prescriptions of parenteral MTX and the inadequate prescription of folic acid are different from the recently published multinational recommendations of the 3E initiative for the use of MTX.

In recent years, claims data analyses have become of increasing importance in several scientific disciplines in Germany. In specific research projects, it can be necessary to refine and to standardize the results by socioeconomic data. Information about graduation, social status, and occupation are provided by the German job role code for all people insured by statutory health insurance. During recent years, the working scheme has changed and new professions have appeared. Therefore, there has been a discussion about actualization and modification of the job role code. Since December 2011, an actualized job role code with an extensive set of new information is available. In addition, a new classification of professions is available in Germany which was considered in the design of the new job role code. The aim of this overview is to describe the structure of the new job role code as well as to discuss possible uses and limitations.