Search

Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery is a novel surgical technique requiring specific training. Different models and simulators have been recently suggested for it, but no systematic review is available. To provide a systematic and critical literature review and up-to-date description of the training models or simulators dedicated to endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery. A search was performed on PubMed and Scopus databases for articles published until February 2023; Google was also searched to document commercially available. For each model, the following features were recorded: training performed, tumor/arachnoid reproduction, assessment and validation, and cost. Of the 1199 retrieved articles, 101 were included in the final analysis. The described models can be subdivided into 5 major categories: (1) enhanced cadaveric heads; (2) animal models; (3) training artificial solutions, with increasing complexity (from "box-trainers" to multi-material, ct-based models); (4) training simulators, based on virtual or augmented reality; (5) Pre-operative planning models and simulators. Each available training model has specific advantages and limitations. Costs are high for cadaver-based solutions and vary significantly for the other solutions. Cheaper solutions seem useful only for the first stages of training. Most models do not provide a simulation of the sellar tumor, and a realistic simulation of the suprasellar arachnoid. Most artificial models do not provide a realistic and cost-efficient simulation of the most delicate and relatively common phase of surgery, i.e., tumor removal with arachnoid preservation; current research should optimize this to train future neurosurgical generations efficiently and safely., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

The role of surgery in the management of primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSL) is currently confined to diagnosis. However, over recent years, an increasing number of papers have suggested a possible positive prognostic impact of surgery in selected cases. The present work aims to perform a meta-analysis of the available literature evidence. A meta-analysis with meta-regression on the role of surgical resection compared to biopsy in the management of PCNSL was conducted according to the PRISMA statement, searching MEDLINE via PubMed and Embase. The random effect model was used. The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE framework. After screening 1395 records, we included 11 papers in our analysis. Patients who underwent surgical resection harbored superficial and single-lesion tumors. At 1-, 2-, and 5-year follow-up, progression-free survival did not differ between the two groups, while overall survival favored resection, even if in a non-significant fashion. Meta-regression analysis showed that the overall survival rate at 2 years, but not at 1 or 5 years, was significantly influenced by tumor location. There were no differences in terms of age, sex, Karnofsky performance status, adjuvant therapy, or procedure-related complications. Overall, the quality of evidence is low. The results of the present meta-analysis do not change the current standard of care for PCNSL. However, surgery could be non-inferior to biopsy with an acceptable risk profile in selected patients harboring single and superficial lesions. The low quality of evidence prompts future randomized studies., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Lumbosacral chordoma is a slow-growing but locally aggressive tumor, resistant to adjuvant treatments and endowed with dismal prognosis. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment but the choice of surgical approach (the posterior-only approach or the combined anterior-posterior approach) remains an open question due to the need of both pursuing a surgical radicality and preserving the neurologic function. The aim of the study was to compare the surgical and clinical outcomes of these approaches in the management of lumbosacral chordomas. A systematic review and meta-analysis in agreement with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines of papers comparing the outcomes of the two approaches was performed. Ten papers met the inclusion criteria. The combined anterior-posterior approach was more frequently performed for tumors with an upper level beyond S2 (p = 0.012). The 5-year progression-free survival was significantly higher in posterior-only approach compared with the combined anterior-posterior approach (44.7% vs 27.1%, p = 0.049). Adjuvant radiotherapy was added more frequently after a posterior-only approach (p = 0.036) and the rate of complications was significantly lower after a posterior-only approach (p = 0.040). No significant differences in sex, age, tumor diameter, entity of resection, and overall survival were observed. Posterior-only surgical approach may be a reasonable option for lumbosacral chordoma, being associated with comparable entity of surgical resection, reduced complication rate and increased 5-year progression-free survival rate as compared with combined anterior-posterior approach., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

The surgical injury of the intracranial portion of the facial nerve (FN) is a severe complication of many skull base procedures, and it represents a relevant issue in terms of patients' discomfort, social interactions, risk for depression, and social costs. The aim of this study was to investigate the surgical and functional outcomes of the most common facial nerve rehabilitation techniques. The present study is a systematic review of the pertinent literature, according to the PRISMA guidelines. Two different online medical databases (PubMed, Scopus) were screened for studies reporting the functional outcome, measured by the House-Brackman (HB) scale, and complications, in FN early reanimation, following surgical injuries on its intracranial portion. Data on the VII-to-VII and XII-to-VII coaptation, the surgical technique, the use of a nerve graft, the duration of the deficit, and complications were collected and pooled. The XII-to-VII end-to-side coaptation seems to provide higher chances for functional restoration (HB 1-3) than the VII-to-VII (68.8% vs 60.6%), regardless of the duration of the palsy deficit, the use or not of a nerve graft, and the use of stitches or glues. However, its complication rate was as high as 28.6%, and a second procedure is then often needed. The XII-to-VII side-to-end coaptation is the most effective in providing a functional outcome (HB 1-3), even though it is associated to a higher complication rate. Further trials are needed to better investigate this relevant topic, in terms of health-related social costs and patients' quality of life.