Search

Introduction: The pipeline embolization device (PED) is commonly used for intracranial aneurysm treatment. While its effectiveness for certain types of aneurysms is well-established, its efficacy for saccular aneurysms remains controversial. We aimed to assess the long-term outcomes of PED treatment for unruptured intracranial saccular aneurysms., Methods: Systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Studies with at least one year of follow-up after PED treatment for saccular aneurysms were included. The primary endpoint was angiographic aneurysm occlusion at long-term follow-up (≥ 12 months), and the secondary outcome was long-term complications. We conducted a meta-regression analysis to explore potential sources of heterogeneity across studies., Results: Eleven studies of 797 patients with 963 aneurysms were included. Long-term angiographic occlusion rate was 85% (95% CI, 77-91%; p < 0.01), symptomatic ischemic stroke rate was 1% (95% CI, 0-3%; p < 0.01), rupture rate was 1% (95% CI, 0-2%; p = 0.02), and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) rate was 0.2% (95% CI, 0-1%; p = 0.11). Meta-regression analysis revealed a non-significant decreasing trend per year for aneurysmal occlusion, ischemic stroke rate, delayed aneurysmal rupture, and ICH., Conclusion: PED demonstrates high long-term occlusion and low complication rates, suggesting it is a safe and effective treatment option for saccular aneurysms. Additionally, newer devices exhibit reduced thrombogenic profiles and safety with decreasing trends in ICH, ischemic stroke, and delayed aneurysmal rupture., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Flow diversion with the pipeline embolization device (PED) is increasingly used to treat intracranial aneurysms with high obliteration rates and low morbidity. However, long-term (≥ 1 year) angiographic and clinical outcomes still require further investigation. The aim of this study was to compare the occlusion and complication rates for small (< 10 mm) versus large (10-25 mm) aneurysms at long-term following treatment with PED. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. We conducted a comprehensive search of English language databases including Ovid MEDLINE and Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process, and Daily, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus. Our studies included a minimum of 10 patients treated with PED for small vs. large aneurysms and with at least 12 months of follow-up. The primary safety endpoint was the rate of clinical complications measured by the occurrence of symptomatic stroke (confirmed clinically and radiographically), intracranial hemorrhage, or aneurysmal rupture. The primary efficacy endpoint was the complete aneurysm occlusion rate. Our analysis included 19 studies with 1277 patients and 1493 aneurysms. Of those, 1378 aneurysms met our inclusion criteria. The mean age was 53.9 years, and most aneurysms were small (89.75%; N = 1340) in women (79.1%; N = 1010). The long-term occlusion rate was 73% (95%, CI 65 to 80%) in small compared to 84% (95%, CI 76 to 90%) in large aneurysms (p < 0.01). The symptomatic thromboembolic complication rate was 5% (95%, CI 3 to 9%) in small compared to 7% (95%, CI 4 to 13%) in large aneurysms (p = 0.01). The rupture rate was 2% vs. 4% (p = 0.92), and the rate of intracranial hemorrhage was 2% vs. 4% (p = 0.96) for small vs. large aneurysms, respectively; however, these differences were not statistically significant. The long-term occlusion rate after PED treatment is higher in large vs. small aneurysms. Symptomatic thromboembolic rates with stroke are also higher in large vs. small aneurysms. The difference in the rates of aneurysm rupture and intracranial hemorrhage was insignificant. Although the PED seems a safe and effective treatment for small and large aneurysms, further studies are required to clarify how occlusion rate and morbidity are affected by aneurysm size., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)