Search

This study aimed to validate the correlation between volumetric bone mineral density in the cervicothoracic and lumbar spine using measurements from opportunistic CT scans. The bone density assessment proved feasible, allowing us to propose optimal cut-off values for diagnosing osteoporosis and predicting vertebral fractures in the cervical and thoracic spine., Objectives: To investigate the performance of cervicothoracic volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD), obtained through opportunistic quantitative computed tomography (QCT), in discriminating patients with/without osteoporosis and with/without vertebral fractures (VFs), using lumbar vBMD as the reference., Methods: Three hundred twenty-five patients (65.3 ± 19.2 years, 140 women) with routine non-contrast or contrast-enhanced multi-detector CT (MDCT) scans were included. Trabecular vBMD was automatically extracted from each vertebra using a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based framework (SpineQ software v1.0) with asynchronous calibration and contrast phase correction. The correlations of vBMD between each vertebra spanning C2-T12 and the averaged lumbar spine (L1-L3, or L4 and L5) vBMD values were analyzed, considering fracture status and degeneration. Vertebra-specific linear regression equations were used to approximate lumbar vBMD at the cervicothoracic spine., Results: Cervicothoracic vBMD correlated well with lumbar vBMD (r = 0.79), with significant improvement after excluding degenerated vertebrae (p < 0.05; r = 0.89), except for C7-T3 and T9. Cervical (AUC = 0.94) and thoracic vBMD (AUC = 0.97) showed strong discriminatory ability for osteoporosis (vBMD < 80 mg/cm 3 ). Excluding degenerated vertebrae at the cervical spine increased the AUC to 0.97. Cervical and thoracic vBMD (AUC = 0.74, AUC = 0.72) were comparable to lumbar vBMD (AUC = 0.72) in differentiating patients with and without prevalent VFs. Trabecular vBMD < 190 mg/cm 3 for the cervical spine and < 100 mg/cm 3 for the thoracic spine were potential indicators of osteoporosis, similar to < 80 mg/cm 3 at the lumbar spine., Conclusion: Cervicothoracic vBMD may allow for determination of osteoporosis and prediction of VFs., Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflicts of interest: None., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: To assess the association of lumbar bone marrow adipose tissue fat fraction (BMAT-FF) and paraspinal muscle proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and their interplay with intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD)., Methods: In this retrospective cross-sectional study based on a prospective population-based cohort, BMAT-FF and PDFF of asymptomatic individuals were calculated based on 3T-MRI dual-echo and multi-echo Dixon VIBE sequences. IVDD was assessed at motion segments L1 to L5 and dichotomized based on Pfirrmann grade ≥ 4 and/or presence of other severe degenerative changes or spinal abnormalities at least at one segment. Pearson's correlation coefficients were calculated for BMAT-FF and PDFF. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models for IVDD were calculated., Results: Among 335 participants (mean age: 56.2 ± 9.0 years, 43.3% female), the average BMI was 27.7 ± 4.5 kg/m 2 and the prevalence of IVDD was high (69.9%). BMAT-FF and PDFF were significantly correlated (r = 0.31-0.34; p < 0.001). The risk for IVDD increased with higher PDFF (OR = 1.45; CI 1.03, 2.04) and BMAT-FF (OR = 1.56; CI 1.16, 2.11). Pairwise combinations of PDFF and BMAT-FF quartiles revealed a lower risk for IVDD in individuals in the lowest BMAT-FF and PDFF quartile (OR = 0.21; CI 0.1, 0.48). Individuals in the highest BMAT-FF and PDFF quartile showed an increased risk for IVDD (OR = 5.12; CI 1.17, 22.34) CONCLUSION: Lumbar BMAT-FF and paraspinal muscle PDFF are correlated and represent both independent and additive risk factors for IVDD. Quantitative MRI measurements of paraspinal myosteatosis and vertebral bone marrow fatty infiltration may serve as imaging biomarkers to assess the individual risk for IVDD., Key Points: • Fat composition of the lumbar vertebral bone marrow is positively correlated with paraspinal skeletal muscle fat. • Higher fat-fractions of lumbar vertebral bone marrow and paraspinal muscle are both independent as well as additive risk factors for intervertebral disc degeneration. • Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging measurements of bone marrow and paraspinal muscle may serve as imaging biomarkers for intervertebral disc degeneration., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Objectives: To determine the correlation between cervicothoracic and lumbar volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) in an average cohort of adults and to identify specific diagnostic thresholds for the cervicothoracic spine on the individual subject level., Methods: In this HIPPA-compliant study, we retrospectively included 260 patients (59.7 ± 18.3 years, 105 women), who received a contrast-enhanced or non-contrast-enhanced CT scan. vBMD was extracted using an automated pipeline ( https://anduin.bonescreen.de ). The association of vBMD between each vertebra spanning C2-T12 and the averaged values at the lumbar spine (L1-L3) was analyzed before and after semiquantitative assessment of fracture status and degeneration, and respective vertebra-specific cut-off values for osteoporosis were calculated using linear regression., Results: In both women and men, trabecular vBMD decreased with age in the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar regions. vBMD values of cervicothoracic vertebrae showed strong correlations with lumbar vertebrae (L1-L3), with a median Pearson value of r = 0.87 (range: r C2  = 0.76 to r T12  = 0.96). The correlation coefficients were significantly lower (p < 0.0001) without excluding fractured and degenerated vertebrae, median r = 0.82 (range: r C2  = 0.69 to r T12  = 0.93). Respective cut-off values for osteoporosis peaked at C4 (209.2 mg/ml) and decreased to 83.8 mg/ml at T12., Conclusion: Our data show a high correlation between clinically used mean L1-L3 values and vBMD values elsewhere in the spine, independent of age. The proposed cut-off values for the cervicothoracic spine therefore may allow the determination of low bone mass even in clinical cases where only parts of the spine are imaged., Key Points: vBMD of all cervicothoracic vertebrae showed strong correlation with lumbar vertebrae (L1-L3), with a median Pearson's correlation coefficient of r = 0.87 (range: r C2  = 0.76 to r T12  = 0.96). The correlation coefficients were significantly lower (p < 0.0001) without excluding fractured and moderate to severely degenerated vertebrae, median r = 0.82 (range: r C2  = 0.69 to r T12  = 0.93). We postulate that trabecular vBMD < 200 mg/ml for the cervical spine and < 100 mg/ml for the thoracic spine are strong indicators of osteoporosis, similar to < 80 mg/ml at the lumbar spine., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Osteoporotic vertebral fractures signify an increased risk of future fractures and mortality and can manifest the diagnosis of osteoporosis. We investigated the prevalence of vertebral fractures in routine CT of patients with long-term hospital records. Three out of ten patients showed osteoporotic vertebral fractures (VFs) corresponding to the highest rates reported in European population-based studies., Introduction: VFs are a common manifestation of osteoporosis, which influences future fracture risk. Their epidemiology has been investigated in population-based studies. However, few studies report the prevalence of osteoporotic VF in patients seen in clinical routine and include all common fracture levels of the thoracolumbar spine. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of osteoporotic VF in patients with CT scans and long-term hospital records and identify clinical factors associated with prevalent VFs., Methods: All patients aged 45 years and older with a CT scan and prior hospital record of at least 5 years that were seen in the study period between September 2008 and May 2017 were reviewed. Imaging requirements were a CT scan with sagittal reformations including at least T6-L4. Patients with multiple myeloma were excluded. Fracture reading was performed using the Genant semi-quantitative method. Medical notes were reviewed for established diagnoses of osteoporosis and clinical information. Clinical factors (e.g. drug intake, chemotherapy, and mobility level) associated with prevalent VF were identified in logistic regression., Results: The study population consisted of 718 patients (228 women and 490 men; mean age 69.3 ± 10.1 years) with mainly cancer staging and angiography CT imaging. The overall prevalence of VFs was 30.5%, with non-significantly more men showing a fracture (32.5%) compared to women (26.3%; p > 0.05). Intake of metamizole for ≥ 3 months was significantly associated with a prevalent VF. Medical records did not include information about bone health in 90% of all patients. CT reports did mention a VF in only 24.7% of patients with a prevalent VF on CT review., Conclusion: Approximately 30% of elderly patients with CT imaging and long-term hospital records showed VFs. Only one-quarter of these patients had VFs mentioned in CT reports. Osteoporosis management could be improved by consequent reporting of VFs in CT, opportunistic bone density measurements, and early involvement of fracture liaison services., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Objectives: To compare spinal bone measures derived from automatic and manual assessment in routine CT with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in their association with prevalent osteoporotic vertebral fractures using our fully automated framework ( https://anduin.bonescreen.de ) to assess various bone measures in clinical CT., Methods: We included 192 patients (141 women, 51 men; age 70.2 ± 9.7 years) who had lumbar DXA and CT available (within 1 year). Automatic assessment of spinal bone measures in CT included segmentation of vertebrae using a convolutional neural network (CNN), reduction to the vertebral body, and extraction of bone mineral content (BMC), trabecular and integral volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD), and CT-based areal BMD (aBMD) using asynchronous calibration. Moreover, trabecular bone was manually sampled (manual vBMD)., Results: A total of 148 patients (77%) had vertebral fractures and significantly lower values in all bone measures compared to patients without fractures (p ≤ 0.001). Except for BMC, all CT-based measures performed significantly better as predictors for vertebral fractures compared to DXA (e.g., AUC = 0.885 for trabecular vBMD and AUC = 0.86 for integral vBMD vs. AUC = 0.668 for DXA aBMD, respectively; both p < 0.001). Age- and sex-adjusted associations with fracture status were strongest for manual vBMD (OR = 7.3, [95%] CI 3.8-14.3) followed by automatically assessed trabecular vBMD (OR = 6.9, CI 3.5-13.4) and integral vBMD (OR = 4.3, CI 2.5-7.6). Diagnostic cutoffs of integral vBMD for osteoporosis (< 160 mg/cm 3 ) or low bone mass (160 ≤ BMD < 190 mg/cm 3 ) had sensitivity (84%/41%) and specificity (78%/95%) similar to trabecular vBMD., Conclusions: Fully automatic osteoporosis screening in routine CT of the spine is feasible. CT-based measures can better identify individuals with reduced bone mass who suffered from vertebral fractures than DXA., Key Points: • Opportunistic osteoporosis screening of spinal bone measures derived from clinical routine CT is feasible in a fully automatic fashion using a deep learning-driven framework ( https://anduin.bonescreen.de ). • Manually sampled volumetric BMD (vBMD) and automatically assessed trabecular and integral vBMD were the best predictors for prevalent vertebral fractures. • Except for bone mineral content, all CT-based bone measures performed significantly better than DXA-based measures. • We introduce diagnostic thresholds of integral vBMD for osteoporosis (< 160 mg/cm 3 ) and low bone mass (160 ≤ BMD < 190 mg/cm 3 ) with almost equal sensitivity and specificity compared to conventional thresholds of quantitative CT as proposed by the American College of Radiology (osteoporosis < 80 mg/cm 3 )., (© 2020. The Author(s).)

Objectives: To investigate potential radiation dose reduction for multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) exams of the spine by using sparse sampling and virtually lowered tube currents combined with statistical iterative reconstruction (SIR)., Methods: MDCT data of 26 patients (68.9 ± 11.7 years, 42.3% males) were retrospectively simulated as if the scans were acquired at 50%, 10%, 5%, and 3% of the original X-ray tube current or number of projections, using SIR for image reconstructions. Two readers performed qualitative image evaluation considering overall image quality, artifacts, and contrast and determined the number and type of degenerative changes. Scoring was compared between readers and virtual low-dose and sparse-sampled MDCT, respectively., Results: Image quality and contrast decreased with virtual lowering of tube current and sparse sampling, but all degenerative changes were correctly detected in MDCT with 50% of tube current as well as MDCT with 50% of projections. Sparse-sampled MDCT with only 10% of initial projections still enabled correct identification of all degenerative changes, in contrast to MDCT with virtual tube current reduction by 90% where non-calcified disc herniations were frequently missed (R1: 23.1%, R2: 21.2% non-diagnosed herniations). The average volumetric CT dose index (CTDI vol ) was 1.4 mGy for MDCT with 10% of initial projections, compared with 13.8 mGy for standard-dose imaging., Conclusions: MDCT with 50% of original tube current or projections using SIR still allowed for accurate diagnosis of degenerative changes. Sparse sampling may be more promising for further radiation dose reductions since no degenerative changes were missed with 10% of initial projections., Key Points: • Most common degenerative changes of the spine can be diagnosed in multi-detector CT with 50% of tube current or number of projections. • Sparse-sampled multi-detector CT with only 10% of initial projections still enables correct identification of degenerative changes, in contrast to imaging with 10% of original tube current. • Sparse sampling may be a promising option for distinct lowering of radiation dose, reducing the CTDI vol from 13.8 to 1.4 mGy in the study cohort.

Osteoporosis is a metabolic bone disease with a high prevalence that affects the population worldwide, particularly the elderly. It is often due to fractures associated with bone fragility that the diagnosis of osteoporosis becomes clinically evident. However, early diagnosis would be necessary to initiate therapy and to prevent occurrence of further fractures, thus reducing morbidity and mortality. X-ray-based imaging plays a key role for fracture risk assessment and monitoring of osteoporosis. Whereas over decades dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) has been the main method used and still reflects the reference standard, another modality reemerges with quantitative computed tomography (QCT) because of its three-dimensional advantages and the opportunistic exploitation of routine CT scans. Against this background, this article intends to review and evaluate recent advances in the field of X-ray-based quantitative imaging of osteoporosis at the spine. First, standard DXA with the recent addition of trabecular bone score (TBS) is presented. Secondly, standard QCT, dual-energy BMD quantification, and opportunistic BMD screening in non-dedicated CT exams are discussed. Lastly, finite element analysis and microstructural parameter analysis are reviewed.

Objectives: To compare opportunistic quantitative CT (QCT) with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in their ability to predict incident vertebral fractures., Methods: We included 84 patients aged 50 years and older, who had routine CT including the lumbar spine and DXA within a 12-month period (baseline) as well as follow-up imaging after at least 12 months or who sustained an incident vertebral fracture documented earlier. Patients with bone disorders aside from osteoporosis were excluded. Fracture status and trabecular bone mineral density (BMD) were retrospectively evaluated in baseline CT and fracture status was reassessed at follow-up. BMD QCT was assessed by opportunistic QCT with asynchronous calibration of multiple MDCT scanners., Results: Sixteen patients had incident vertebral fractures showing lower mean BMD QCT than patients without fracture (p = 0.001). For the risk of incident vertebral fractures, the hazard ratio increased per SD in BMD QCT (4.07; 95% CI, 1.98-8.38), as well as after adjusting for age, sex, and prevalent fractures (2.54; 95% CI, 1.09-5.90). For DXA, a statistically significant increase in relative hazard per SD decrease in T-score was only observed after age and sex adjustment (1.57; 95% CI, 1.04-2.38). The predictability of incident vertebral fractures was good by BMD QCT (AUC = 0.76; 95% CI, 0.64-0.89) and non-significant by T-scores. Asynchronously calibrated CT scanners showed good long-term stability (linear drift ranging from - 0.55 to - 2.29 HU per year)., Conclusions: Opportunistic screening of mainly neurosurgical and oncologic patients in CT performed for indications other than densitometry allows for better risk assessment of imminent vertebral fractures than dedicated DXA., Key Points: • Opportunistic QCT predicts osteoporotic vertebral fractures better than DXA reference standard in mainly neurosurgical and oncologic patients. • More than every second patient (56%) with an incident vertebral fracture was misdiagnosed not having osteoporosis according to DXA. • Standard ACR QCT-cutoff values for osteoporosis (< 80 mg/cm 3 ) and osteopenia (≤ 120 mg/cm 3 ) can also be applied scanner independently in calibrated opportunistic QCT.

Purpose: To systematically evaluate the effects of virtual tube current reduction and sparse sampling on image quality and vertebral fracture diagnostics in multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT)., Materials and Methods: In routine MDCT scans of 35 patients (80.0% females, 70.6 ± 14.2 years, 65.7% showing vertebral fractures), reduced radiation doses were retrospectively simulated by virtually lowering tube currents and applying sparse sampling, considering 50%, 25%, and 10% of the original tube current and projections, respectively. Two readers evaluated items of image quality and presence of vertebral fractures. Readout between the evaluations in the original images and those with virtually lowered tube currents or sparse sampling were compared., Results: A significant difference was revealed between the evaluations of image quality between MDCT with virtually lowered tube current and sparse-sampled MDCT (p < 0.001). Sparse-sampled data with only 25% of original projections still showed good to very good overall image quality and contrast of vertebrae as well as minimal artifacts. There were no missed fractures in sparse-sampled MDCT with 50% reduction of projections, and clinically acceptable determination of fracture age was possible in MDCT with 75% reduction of projections, in contrast to MDCT with 50% or 75% virtual tube current reduction, respectively., Conclusion: Sparse-sampled MDCT provides adequate image quality and diagnostic accuracy for vertebral fracture detection with 50% of original projections in contrast to corresponding MDCT with lowered tube current. Thus, sparse sampling is a promising technique for dose reductions in MDCT that could be introduced in future generations of scanners., Key Points: • MDCT with a reduction of projection numbers of 50% still showed high diagnostic accuracy without any missed vertebral fractures. • Clinically acceptable determination of vertebral fracture age was possible in MDCT with a reduction of projection numbers of 75%. • With sparse sampling, higher reductions in radiation exposure can be achieved without compromised image or diagnostic quality in routine MDCT of the spine as compared to MDCT with reduced tube currents.

Our study proposed an automatic pipeline for opportunistic osteoporosis screening using 3D texture features and regional vBMD using multi-detector CT images. A combination of different local and global texture features outperformed the global vBMD and showed high discriminative power to identify patients with vertebral fractures., Introduction: Many patients at risk for osteoporosis undergo computed tomography (CT) scans, usable for opportunistic (non-dedicated) screening. We compared the performance of global volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) with a random forest classifier based on regional vBMD and 3D texture features to separate patients with and without osteoporotic fractures., Methods: In total, 154 patients (mean age 64 ± 8.5, male; n = 103) were included in this retrospective single-center analysis, who underwent contrast-enhanced CT for other reasons than osteoporosis screening. Patients were dichotomized regarding prevalent vertebral osteoporotic fractures (noFX, n = 101; FX, n = 53). Vertebral bodies were automatically segmented, and trabecular vBMD was calculated with a dedicated phantom. For 3D texture analysis, we extracted gray-level co-occurrence matrix Haralick features (HAR), histogram of gradients (HoG), local binary patterns (LBP), and wavelets (WL). Fractured vertebrae were excluded for texture-feature and vBMD data extraction. The performance to identify patients with prevalent osteoporotic vertebral fractures was evaluated in a fourfold cross-validation., Results: The random forest classifier showed a high discriminatory power (AUC = 0.88). Parameters of all vertebral levels significantly contributed to this classification. Importantly, the AUC of the proposed algorithm was significantly higher than that of volumetric global BMD alone (AUC = 0.64)., Conclusion: The presented classifier combining 3D texture features and regional vBMD including the complete thoracolumbar spine showed high discriminatory power to identify patients with vertebral fractures and had a better diagnostic performance than vBMD alone.