1. Diagnostic accuracy of 128-slice dual-source CT coronary angiography: a randomized comparison of different acquisition protocols.
- Author
-
Neefjes LA, Rossi A, Genders TS, Nieman K, Papadopoulou SL, Dharampal AS, Schultz CJ, Weustink AC, Dijkshoorn ML, Ten Kate GJ, Dedic A, van Straten M, Cademartiri F, Hunink MG, Krestin GP, de Feyter PJ, and Mollet NR
- Subjects
- Coronary Angiography methods, Coronary Artery Disease epidemiology, Female, Humans, Incidence, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands epidemiology, Prevalence, Reproducibility of Results, Risk Factors, Sensitivity and Specificity, Tomography, X-Ray Computed methods, Coronary Angiography statistics & numerical data, Coronary Artery Disease diagnostic imaging, Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted methods, Radiography, Dual-Energy Scanned Projection methods, Tomography, X-Ray Computed statistics & numerical data
- Abstract
Objectives: To compare the diagnostic performance and radiation exposure of 128-slice dual-source CT coronary angiography (CTCA) protocols to detect coronary stenosis with more than 50 % lumen obstruction., Methods: We prospectively included 459 symptomatic patients referred for CTCA. Patients were randomized between high-pitch spiral vs. narrow-window sequential CTCA protocols (heart rate below 65 bpm, group A), or between wide-window sequential vs. retrospective spiral protocols (heart rate above 65 bpm, group B). Diagnostic performance of CTCA was compared with quantitative coronary angiography in 267 patients., Results: In group A (231 patients, 146 men, mean heart rate 58 ± 7 bpm), high-pitch spiral CTCA yielded a lower per-segment sensitivity compared to sequential CTCA (89 % vs. 97 %, P = 0.01). Specificity, PPV and NPV were comparable (95 %, 62 %, 99 % vs. 96 %, 73 %, 100 %, P > 0.05) but radiation dose was lower (1.16 ± 0.60 vs. 3.82 ± 1.65 mSv, P < 0.001). In group B (228 patients, 132 men, mean heart rate 75 ± 11 bpm), per-segment sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were comparable (94 %, 95 %, 67 %, 99 % vs. 92 %, 95 %, 66 %, 99 %, P > 0.05). Radiation dose of sequential CTCA was lower compared to retrospective CTCA (6.12 ± 2.58 vs. 8.13 ± 4.52 mSv, P < 0.001). Diagnostic performance was comparable in both groups., Conclusion: Sequential CTCA should be used in patients with regular heart rates using 128-slice dual-source CT, providing optimal diagnostic accuracy with as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) radiation dose.
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF