1. Current status of the surgical training system in Japan: results of a nationwide questionnaire survey of graduating surgical trainees.
- Author
-
Kiyasu Y, Poudel S, Koike D, Watanabe J, Kowatari R, Fukumoto M, Yamaoka-Fujikawa Y, Kikuchi Y, Arai K, Booka E, Ishida S, Yokoyama S, and Saito M
- Subjects
- Japan, Humans, Surveys and Questionnaires, Female, Male, Adult, Internship and Residency statistics & numerical data, General Surgery education, Quality of Life
- Abstract
Purpose: To identify the problems trainees face during surgical training in Japan., Methods: A nationwide online questionnaire survey was conducted targeting newly certified surgical trainees., Results: The response rate was 53.8% (758/1410). Among those respondents, 25.6% were women, 71.4% were either married or had a partner, 41.3% had children, 72.7% had performed over 200 surgeries under general anesthesia, and 54.1% had chosen, before graduating from medical school, to become a surgeon. While 88.8% were interested in learning surgical techniques, 63.8% were hesitant to become a surgeon for fear of a compromised quality of private life (QOL). Conversely, only 1.4% chose their surgical training programs based on QOL. Overall, 84.6% of the trainees were satisfied with their training and this correlated with the number of surgeries performed. Only 29.9% received non-technical skill training. The average number of night shifts per month was 5.6, and 10.6% worked over 80 h per week. Harassment was reported by 41.5% of the respondents. Moreover, 33.0% had considered dropping out at some time, primarily because of their QOL (51.1%) or the harassment they had encountered (50.4%)., Conclusion: This survey revealed that while trainees were satisfied with the overall training system, issues such as long working hours and harassment are prevalent. Working to improve these issues could make surgery more attractive for young trainees., Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflict of interest: We have no conflicts of interest to declare. Ethical approval: This research proposal was approved by the research ethics review committee of the JSS (JSS2023-1)., (© 2024. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2025
- Full Text
- View/download PDF