Search

Purpose: To identify the incidence of and risk factors for postoperative bleeding after ileocolic end-to-side anastomosis using a circular stapler., Methods: We analyzed, retrospectively, the risk factors for postoperative anastomotic bleeding in patients who underwent right-sided colectomy with end-to-side anastomosis done using a circular stapler during colon tumor surgery at our institute between January 2015 and March 2019., Results: Anastomotic bleeding developed in 10 (3.6%) of the total 279 patients. Univariate analysis revealed that age ≥ 80 years (8.8% vs. 1.9%; P = 0.008) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≥ 1 (12.5% vs. 2.8%; P = 0.014) were significant risk factors for anastomotic bleeding. Postoperative anticoagulation therapy was not a risk factor for anastomotic bleeding. Multivariate analysis revealed that only age ≥ 80 years was an independent risk factor (odds ratio 4.12, 95% confidence interval 1.02-16.68, P = 0.047). Six of the ten patients with anastomotic bleeding were treated conservatively, three were treated by colonoscopic clipping, and one required surgery., Conclusion: End-to-side anastomosis is safe and feasible, but must be performed carefully in the elderly, who are at higher risk of anastomotic bleeding.

Isolated para-aortic lymph node recurrence (PALNR) after curative surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) is rare and its optimal management is not defined clearly. This review investigates the best outcomes among published studies on the management of PALNR in the field of CRC. We searched the PubMed database for studies reporting on the management of isolated PALNR in CRC, published in English or Japanese from January, 2000 to December, 2018. Studies including patients with other metastases were excluded. A total of 24 retrospective studies including 227 patients with PALNR were evaluated. The 3-year overall survival (OS) ranged from 60 to 100%, with a median OS of 34-80 months for patients who underwent PALNR dissection, and 14-42 months for patients who received non-surgical treatment. No surgery-related mortality was reported and the incidence of surgical, mainly low-grade, complications ranged from 33 to 52%. The predictors of improved survival outcome included R0 resection margins. Dissection for PALNR from CRC is considered a feasible treatment option that may yield a better prognosis than non-surgical treatment alone. Preoperative chemotherapy or CRT should be considered for their potential benefits, including a reduction in cancer volume and improved R0 resection rates.

Purpose: Advances in systemic chemotherapy have increased the resectability in colorectal cancer (CRC) associated with metastases even if it was initially unresectable. However, what determines the prognosis of stage IV CRC patients treated by preoperative therapy and surgery remains unclear. We attempted to identify prognostic factors in such CRC patients., Methods: We reviewed stage IV CRC patients who underwent curative resection between December 2007 and May 2019. The patients who underwent conversion chemotherapy for initially unresectable disease and those who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for resectable synchronous metastases or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) for advanced lower rectal cancer with resectable metastases were included. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were examined by multivariate analyses using Cox proportional hazard models. The RFS and OS curves were analyzed according to postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (AC)., Results: Among 70 patients who underwent curative surgery (34 men, mean age: 60 years old), 33 had initially unresectable disease, 23 received NAC, and 14 NACRT. By multivariate analyses, AC was an independent predictor for improved RFS and OS (hazard ratio = 0.29, p = 0.0002, and hazard ratio = 0.37, p = 0.025). Patients treated with AC showed improved RFS and OS than those without AC (2-year RFS rate = 30% vs 19%, p = 0.031, and 3-year OS rate = 87% vs 67%, p = 0.045)., Conclusion: Because of its association with improved prognosis, AC should be considered for stage IV CRC patients after curative resection regardless of initial resectability status and preoperative therapy.

Purpose: Most elderly patients with colorectal cancer have comorbidities and reduced functional reserve, which may increase their risks of postoperative morbidity and mortality, and subsequently influence the treatment choice. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the treatment choice and compare laparoscopic and open surgery in this setting., Methods: This retrospective study evaluated 118 patients with colorectal cancer (≥ 85 years old between January 2007 and February 2018) to determine the influence of comorbidities on treatment choice, as well as the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for these patients., Results: The patients included 42 men (35.6%) and 106 patients (89.8%) with comorbidities. The treatments were curative resection for 90 patients and palliative surgery for 16 patients, including 5 cases of colostomy/ileostomy because of the difficulty of primary cancer resection, pneumonia, or pulmonary hypertension. Twelve patients received non-surgical treatment, including 7 patients with decreased respiratory function because of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or pneumonia. Forty-three patients underwent open curative resection and 47 patients underwent laparoscopic curative resection, which was associated with a significantly shorter hospital stay (14 days vs. 19days, P < 0.01), a lower morbidity rate (17.0% vs. 37.2%, P = 0.035), and less blood loss (10 mL vs. 140 mL, P < 0.01). One patient in each group died during the postoperative period because of worsened pre-existing pneumonia., Conclusion: Laparoscopic surgery was safer and less invasive than open surgery for colorectal cancer among ≥ 85-year-old patients. Pulmonary comorbidities affected the choice of non-curative surgery and may be related to the risk of postoperative mortality.

Rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is a rare entity. Thus, its clinical features have not been well documented, and optimal treatment strategies have not been established. Surgery for rectal GISTs may be difficult because they are often large in size. In addition, rectal GISTs were found to be associated with high rates of local recurrence, regardless of the surgical procedure, before imatinib was introduced in the early 2000s. Since the introduction of imatinib therapy, accumulating evidence suggests that neoadjuvant imatinib therapy may improve the outcomes of rectal GIST treatment. Neoadjuvant imatinib therapy for rectal GISTs offers a number of potential benefits, including tumor downsizing, reduction in mitotic activity, reduced morbidity, and a reduced risk of recurrence. Less radical procedures may allow for the preservation of the anal sphincter and avoidance of a permanent colostomy. This review summarizes the current status and future perspectives of neoadjuvant imatinib therapy for the treatment of rectal GISTs.

Purpose: The doubling times of tumor volume and tumor markers are associated with the prognosis of liver or lung metastases from colorectal cancer (CRC). However, no studies have assessed peritoneal metastases. Therefore, we aimed to elucidate the association between doubling time and the prognosis of patients who underwent radical surgery for metachronous peritoneal metastases of CRC., Methods: We calculated the tumor doubling times (TDT) of peritoneal metastases and serum carcinoembryonic antigen-doubling times (CEA-DT) in 33 consecutive patients who underwent radical surgery for metachronous peritoneal metastases between January 2006 and April 2017. The impact of short TDT and CEA-DT on overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) was retrospectively reviewed., Results: In long TDT (> 137 days) group, the 5-year OS rate was 74.1% and median OS time was 6.6 years. In long CEA-DT (> 102 days) group, the 5-year OS rate was 50.0% and median OS time was 5.6 years. Conversely, in short TDT (≤ 137 days) and CEA-DT (≤ 102 days) group, the 5-year OS rates and median OS times were both 0.0% and 3.2 years, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, short TDT was an independent risk factor for poor RFS (P = 0.006) and OS (P = 0.010). Similarly, short CEA-DT was also a poor risk factor for RFS (P < 0.001) and OS (P = 0.012)., Conclusions: Short TDT and CEA-DT are independent risk factors for poor OS and RFS after surgery for metachronous peritoneal metastases of CRC. TDT and CEA-DT should be considered when selecting candidates for surgical resection.