1. Multi-generation genomic prediction of maize yield using parametric and non-parametric sparse selection indices
- Author
-
Manje Gowda, Marco Lopez-Cruz, Gustavo de los Campos, Yoseph Beyene, Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez, and José Crossa
- Subjects
Genome ,Models, Genetic ,Nonparametric statistics ,Genomics ,Biology ,Quantitative trait ,Genetic models ,Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide ,Zea mays ,Article ,Set (abstract data type) ,Kernel method ,Phenotype ,Kernel (statistics) ,Statistics ,Genetics ,Additive model ,Genetics (clinical) ,Selection (genetic algorithm) ,Predictive modelling ,Parametric statistics - Abstract
Genomic prediction models are often calibrated using multi-generation data. Over time, as data accumulates, training data sets become increasingly heterogeneous. Differences in allele frequency and linkage disequilibrium patterns between the training and prediction genotypes may limit prediction accuracy. This leads to the question of whether all available data or a subset of it should be used to calibrate genomic prediction models. Previous research on training set optimization has focused on identifying a subset of the available data that is optimal for a given prediction set. However, this approach does not contemplate the possibility that different training sets may be optimal for different prediction genotypes. To address this problem, we recently introduced a sparse selection index (SSI) that identifies an optimal training set for each individual in a prediction set. Using additive genomic relationships, the SSI can provide increased accuracy relative to genomic-BLUP (GBLUP). Non-parametric genomic models using Gaussian kernels (KBLUP) have, in some cases, yielded higher prediction accuracies than standard additive models. Therefore, here we studied whether combining SSIs and kernel methods could further improve prediction accuracy when training genomic models using multi-generation data. Using four years of doubled haploid maize data from the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), we found that when predicting grain yield the KBLUP outperformed the GBLUP, and that using SSI with additive relationships (GSSI) lead to 5–17% increases in accuracy, relative to the GBLUP. However, differences in prediction accuracy between the KBLUP and the kernel-based SSI were smaller and not always significant.
- Published
- 2021