Search

Purpose: The authors sought to compare the diagnostic performance of the Mammotome(®) and EnCor(®) vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB) systems in the assessment of suspicious mammographic microcalcifications., Materials and Methods: Between January 2011 and July 2012, a total of 169 VABB were performed by stereotactic guidance on a prone table. The Mammotome(®) 11G (S1) or EnCor(®) 10G (S2) probes were used randomly. Sampling time and the number of frustules collected were considered; sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic accuracy, positive and negative predictive value (PPV, NPV) of both procedures were evaluated, considering the final histological examination as reference (B1, B3, B5 lesions underwent surgical excision; B2 lesion were considered confirmed after a negative follow-up of at least 1 year)., Results: There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups of patients according to the number of procedures (S1 82/169; S2 87/169), average age, BIRADS category (4a, b), and average size of the lesions. The two systems did not differ statistically for correlation with the final histology (S1 k = 0.94 ± 0.06; S2 k = 0.92 ± 0.08) and underestimation of B3 lesions or in situ (S1 4.5%; S2 4.3%). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, diagnostic accuracy of S1 and S2 were also not statistically different. The systems differed only in sampling time (S1 80; S2 63 s), but not in total procedure time., Conclusions: Our study confirms the effectiveness of VABB in the assessment of microcalcifications and highlights the lack of significant differences between the two systems in terms of diagnostic performance.

Objective: This study was done to assess breast density on digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis according to the visual Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) classification, to compare visual assessment with Quantra software for automated density measurement, and to establish the role of the software in clinical practice., Materials and Methods: We analysed 200 digital mammograms performed in 2D and 3D modality, 100 of which positive for breast cancer and 100 negative. Radiological density was assessed with the BI-RADS classification; a Quantra density cut-off value was sought on the 2D images only to discriminate between BI-RADS categories 1-2 and BI-RADS 3-4. Breast density was correlated with age, use of hormone therapy, and increased risk of disease., Results: The agreement between the 2D and 3D assessments of BI-RADS density was high (K 0.96). A cut-off value of 21% is that which allows us to best discriminate between BI-RADS categories 1-2 and 3-4. Breast density was negatively correlated to age (r = -0.44) and positively to use of hormone therapy (p = 0.0004). Quantra density was higher in breasts with cancer than in healthy breasts., Conclusions: There is no clear difference between the visual assessments of density on 2D and 3D images. Use of the automated system requires the adoption of a cut-off value (set at 21%) to effectively discriminate BI-RADS 1-2 and 3-4, and could be useful in clinical practice.

Purpose: Accurate measurement of breast tumour size is fundamental for treatment planning. We compared the accuracy of digital mammography (DM), digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT), ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the preoperative evaluation of breast cancer size., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 149 breast cancers in 110 patients who underwent DM, DBT, US and MRI between January 2010 and December 2011, before definitive surgery. The lesions were measured by two radiologists, without knowledge of the final histological examination, considered the gold standard. For each imaging modality, the maximum tumour size was measured to the nearest millimetre; the measurements were considered concordant if they were within ± 5 mm. Pearson's correlation coefficient was calculated for each imaging modality., Results: The median pathological tumour size was 22.3 mm. MRI and DBT had a level of concordance with pathology of 70% and 66%, respectively, which was higher than that of DM (54%). DBT and MRI measurements had a better correlation with pathological tumour size (R:0.89 and R:0.92, respectively) compared to DM (R:0.83) and US (R:0.77)., Conclusions: DBT and MRI are superior to DM and US in the preoperative assessment of breast tumour size. DBT seems to improve the accuracy of DM, although MRI remains the most accurate imaging modality for breast cancer extension.

Purpose: The authors evaluated the relative risk of developing radiation-induced breast cancer (BC) in women treated with radiotherapy for Hodgkin's disease (HD) and analysed the imaging features of these breast neoplasms., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively studied 54 women who had all undergone radiotherapy between 1980 and 2010 (median age, 36.6 years). Women aged ≤30 years were screened with clinical breast examination, ultrasound (US) and, if necessary, mammography; women >30 years had clinical breast examination, US and mammography. Three women underwent magnetic resonance (MR) imaging as well., Results: Mammography detected seven invasive breast cancers in 6/54 women (11.1%). Median age at diagnosis was 26.1 years for HD and 42.4 for breast cancer. Breast cancer was diagnosed following a median latent period from radiotherapy of 15.1 years. Mean radiation dose was 37.6 Gy in women who developed breast cancer and 31.3 Gy in the other women., Conclusions: In our study, women who were exposed to radiation for HD had a 6.2-fold higher risk of developing breast cancer than the general population. In consideration of the young age and high breast density, women aged ≤30 years should be monitored by US and MR imaging; women aged >30 years should be monitored by US, mammography and, when necessary, MR imaging.

Purpose: This study was conducted to evaluate the role and clinical impact of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis and follow-up of acute pyelonephritis (APN)., Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 442 consecutive renal MRI examinations (279 diagnostic and 163 follow-up) performed in 285 patients (mean age 42.17 years), 35 of whom were kidney transplant recipients with a clinical suspicion of APN., Results: MRI showed signal abnormalities suggestive of APN in 125/244 (51.2%) patients with native kidneys. Except for two examinations performed without paramagnetic contrast material, the inflammatory foci appeared as areas of nonenhancement: single in 39/123 cases, multiple in 84/123, unilateral in 60/84 and bilateral in 24/84. Abscesses were present in 40/123 (32.5%) positive cases. During follow-up, we observed complete normalisation of MRI signs in 86/103 patients; 17/103 (16.5%) cases evolved into fibrosis and scarring. In 15/35 (42.8%) patients with transplanted kidney, MRI was positive for APN., Conclusions: Renal MRI is an effective tool for the diagnosis and follow-up of APN both in patients not at risk and those at higher risk, such as those with a transplanted kidney. The high costs of the examination are offset by better treatment planning and early complication detection.