Search

Introduction: Ganglionic local opioid analgesia (GLOA) at the superior cervical ganglion (SCG) is performed for pain control and is known to be an effective procedure. In this study, we evaluated the spread of the injectate in the area of the SCG. Our expectation was that there would be a correlation between the area and volume of the injectate spread and post-procedural outcome measures. Methods: This was a retrospective blinded review of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. Assessors evaluated the anatomical area of fluid spread, the furthermost spread from midline, any hampered spread and contact of contrast fluid with other structures. The efficacy of GLOA and complications were estimated. Results: The main solution spread reached from the C1 to C3 vertebrae. The furthest spread in the lateral and sagittal planes was 21.2 and 15.2 mm, respectively. The furthest craniocaudal spread was 63.5 mm. In 53.3% and 33% of interventions, the solution was found in the parapharyngeal space and in its "medial compartment," respectively. A correlation was found between pain relief and both solution spread and volume of solution spread. No hampered spread was recorded. A negative correlation between pain reduction and number of GLOA was observed. Higher pre-procedural pain intensity was correlated with higher pain reduction. We estimated pain relief in 93% of procedures correctly. No correlation between post-procedural Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) scores and different needle approaches was found. Conclusion: For the transoral blocking technique, a strict laterodorsal needle direction is recommended to prevent possible block failures. A total volume of 2 ml injected into the parapharyngeal space and its "medial compartment" is recommended. Higher volumes may lead to uncontrolled distribution patterns. Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT05257655; date of registration 2022-02-25; patient enrollment date from 2023-01-09 to 2023-08-31. Plain Language Summary: The injection of low-dose opioids (mainly buprenorphine or sufentanil) to different sympathetic ganglia has been termed "ganglionic local opioid analgesia" (GLOA). This form of therapy has been successfully used for numerous, often protracted diseases that severely impair the patient's quality of life, such as trigeminal neuralgia. For example, as part of a multimodal approach for pain management, GLOA at the superior cervical ganglion should be considered for pain treatment in patients suffering from trigeminal neuralgia with high pre-procedural pain scores. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Computed tomography (CT)-guided coeliac plexus neurolysis (CPN) is considered effective at controlling pain in patients with intra-abdominal malignancies. The primary objective was to correlate pain outcomes with the spread of neurolytic solution in the coeliac area and to evaluate the predictive value for the spread of injectate for pain outcomes and side effects. Methods: Blinded CT scans were reviewed. The coeliac area was divided into nine quadrants. Assessors evaluated quadrants according to contrast spread, needle tip position, and the contact between the injectate and other organs and plexuses. Efficacy of CPN and complications were estimated. Results: In 54.9% there was complete spread of the neurolytic in the coeliac area with no correlation between pain relief and spread of injectate. In 85% the neurolytic had contact with viscera with no correlation with pain relief or complications. There was no correlation between needle tip position and spread of the neurolytic and contact of the neurolytic with viscera. In 71.6% the injectate was found to have spread into "other" plexuses. In 13.3% hampered spread of the injectate was observed. There was no correlation between patterns of injectate spread and pain relief, pain relief and spread of injectate in any particular quadrants, and expected and documented post-procedural pain scores. Conclusions: Based on the spread of contrast medium clinicians can neither correctly anticipate the pain relief or post-procedural NRS, nor the duration of pain relief and complications. It is not essential to have the perfect sickle-shaped spread of the injectate for adequate pain control. Plain language summary: CT-guided coeliac plexus neurolysis is considered effective at controlling pain in patients with intra-abdominal malignancies. Based on the spread of contrast medium clinicians can neither correctly anticipate the pain relief or post-procedural NRS, nor the duration of pain relief and complications. It is not essential to have the perfect sickle-shaped spread of the injectate for adequate pain control. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Pain is the most common reason for seeking medical treatment. Despite extensive research efforts and effective analgesics modulating pain, there is still a major therapeutic gap in addressing the root causes of pain. Pain is associated with tissue damage induced by oxidative stress and induction of inflammatory mediators following high consumption of antioxidants. The role of antioxidants in general, and the administration of l-ascorbate in particular, is still controversially discussed and underestimated in the daily clinical practice.The current literature on the therapeutic effect of l-ascorbate, ascorbic acid, and vitamin C on various pain conditions was evaluated against the background of evidence-based medicine. Those articles, obtained from systematic search in PubMed, were critically assessed and rated in terms of evidence level and methodological quality by two independent experts. The primary purpose of this work was to establish specific pain therapy guidance for intravenous l-ascorbate.A PubMed search revealed 14 suitable articles comprising controlled clinical trials and meta-analyses. An additional ten publications could be identified via secondary literature. There is supporting evidence for the efficacy of ascorbate treatment in inflammatory pain conditions, in the complex regional pain syndrome, in post zoster neuralgia, in neuropathic pain, in post-operative pain conditions, and in tumor-related pain. However, the considered studies differ in the type of administration, in dosage, in duration of treatment, as well as in quality of research. Despite all study heterogeneity, it became evident that research of high scientific quality is in support of the efficacy of l-ascorbate in pain treatment.Oxidative stress is present in almost all pain conditions. Because oral administration of most magistral formulas of vitamin C does not provide biological availability, parenteral administration should be preferred and can be supported by an oral dose with high bioavailability on days without intravenous treatment. l-ascorbate should be preferred for parenteral high dosage, rather than ascorbic acid, as it does not release acid valences under physiological conditions.l-ascorbate is an effective, safe, and economically favorable integrative treatment option for various pain conditions, addressing the root cause of tissue damage and inflammatory mediator burst.Methods: Pain is the most common reason for seeking medical treatment. Despite extensive research efforts and effective analgesics modulating pain, there is still a major therapeutic gap in addressing the root causes of pain. Pain is associated with tissue damage induced by oxidative stress and induction of inflammatory mediators following high consumption of antioxidants. The role of antioxidants in general, and the administration of l-ascorbate in particular, is still controversially discussed and underestimated in the daily clinical practice.The current literature on the therapeutic effect of l-ascorbate, ascorbic acid, and vitamin C on various pain conditions was evaluated against the background of evidence-based medicine. Those articles, obtained from systematic search in PubMed, were critically assessed and rated in terms of evidence level and methodological quality by two independent experts. The primary purpose of this work was to establish specific pain therapy guidance for intravenous l-ascorbate.A PubMed search revealed 14 suitable articles comprising controlled clinical trials and meta-analyses. An additional ten publications could be identified via secondary literature. There is supporting evidence for the efficacy of ascorbate treatment in inflammatory pain conditions, in the complex regional pain syndrome, in post zoster neuralgia, in neuropathic pain, in post-operative pain conditions, and in tumor-related pain. However, the considered studies differ in the type of administration, in dosage, in duration of treatment, as well as in quality of research. Despite all study heterogeneity, it became evident that research of high scientific quality is in support of the efficacy of l-ascorbate in pain treatment.Oxidative stress is present in almost all pain conditions. Because oral administration of most magistral formulas of vitamin C does not provide biological availability, parenteral administration should be preferred and can be supported by an oral dose with high bioavailability on days without intravenous treatment. l-ascorbate should be preferred for parenteral high dosage, rather than ascorbic acid, as it does not release acid valences under physiological conditions.l-ascorbate is an effective, safe, and economically favorable integrative treatment option for various pain conditions, addressing the root cause of tissue damage and inflammatory mediator burst.Results: Pain is the most common reason for seeking medical treatment. Despite extensive research efforts and effective analgesics modulating pain, there is still a major therapeutic gap in addressing the root causes of pain. Pain is associated with tissue damage induced by oxidative stress and induction of inflammatory mediators following high consumption of antioxidants. The role of antioxidants in general, and the administration of l-ascorbate in particular, is still controversially discussed and underestimated in the daily clinical practice.The current literature on the therapeutic effect of l-ascorbate, ascorbic acid, and vitamin C on various pain conditions was evaluated against the background of evidence-based medicine. Those articles, obtained from systematic search in PubMed, were critically assessed and rated in terms of evidence level and methodological quality by two independent experts. The primary purpose of this work was to establish specific pain therapy guidance for intravenous l-ascorbate.A PubMed search revealed 14 suitable articles comprising controlled clinical trials and meta-analyses. An additional ten publications could be identified via secondary literature. There is supporting evidence for the efficacy of ascorbate treatment in inflammatory pain conditions, in the complex regional pain syndrome, in post zoster neuralgia, in neuropathic pain, in post-operative pain conditions, and in tumor-related pain. However, the considered studies differ in the type of administration, in dosage, in duration of treatment, as well as in quality of research. Despite all study heterogeneity, it became evident that research of high scientific quality is in support of the efficacy of l-ascorbate in pain treatment.Oxidative stress is present in almost all pain conditions. Because oral administration of most magistral formulas of vitamin C does not provide biological availability, parenteral administration should be preferred and can be supported by an oral dose with high bioavailability on days without intravenous treatment. l-ascorbate should be preferred for parenteral high dosage, rather than ascorbic acid, as it does not release acid valences under physiological conditions.l-ascorbate is an effective, safe, and economically favorable integrative treatment option for various pain conditions, addressing the root cause of tissue damage and inflammatory mediator burst.Discussion: Pain is the most common reason for seeking medical treatment. Despite extensive research efforts and effective analgesics modulating pain, there is still a major therapeutic gap in addressing the root causes of pain. Pain is associated with tissue damage induced by oxidative stress and induction of inflammatory mediators following high consumption of antioxidants. The role of antioxidants in general, and the administration of l-ascorbate in particular, is still controversially discussed and underestimated in the daily clinical practice.The current literature on the therapeutic effect of l-ascorbate, ascorbic acid, and vitamin C on various pain conditions was evaluated against the background of evidence-based medicine. Those articles, obtained from systematic search in PubMed, were critically assessed and rated in terms of evidence level and methodological quality by two independent experts. The primary purpose of this work was to establish specific pain therapy guidance for intravenous l-ascorbate.A PubMed search revealed 14 suitable articles comprising controlled clinical trials and meta-analyses. An additional ten publications could be identified via secondary literature. There is supporting evidence for the efficacy of ascorbate treatment in inflammatory pain conditions, in the complex regional pain syndrome, in post zoster neuralgia, in neuropathic pain, in post-operative pain conditions, and in tumor-related pain. However, the considered studies differ in the type of administration, in dosage, in duration of treatment, as well as in quality of research. Despite all study heterogeneity, it became evident that research of high scientific quality is in support of the efficacy of l-ascorbate in pain treatment.Oxidative stress is present in almost all pain conditions. Because oral administration of most magistral formulas of vitamin C does not provide biological availability, parenteral administration should be preferred and can be supported by an oral dose with high bioavailability on days without intravenous treatment. l-ascorbate should be preferred for parenteral high dosage, rather than ascorbic acid, as it does not release acid valences under physiological conditions.l-ascorbate is an effective, safe, and economically favorable integrative treatment option for various pain conditions, addressing the root cause of tissue damage and inflammatory mediator burst.Conclusions: Pain is the most common reason for seeking medical treatment. Despite extensive research efforts and effective analgesics modulating pain, there is still a major therapeutic gap in addressing the root causes of pain. Pain is associated with tissue damage induced by oxidative stress and induction of inflammatory mediators following high consumption of antioxidants. The role of antioxidants in general, and the administration of l-ascorbate in particular, is still controversially discussed and underestimated in the daily clinical practice.The current literature on the therapeutic effect of l-ascorbate, ascorbic acid, and vitamin C on various pain conditions was evaluated against the background of evidence-based medicine. Those articles, obtained from systematic search in PubMed, were critically assessed and rated in terms of evidence level and methodological quality by two independent experts. The primary purpose of this work was to establish specific pain therapy guidance for intravenous l-ascorbate.A PubMed search revealed 14 suitable articles comprising controlled clinical trials and meta-analyses. An additional ten publications could be identified via secondary literature. There is supporting evidence for the efficacy of ascorbate treatment in inflammatory pain conditions, in the complex regional pain syndrome, in post zoster neuralgia, in neuropathic pain, in post-operative pain conditions, and in tumor-related pain. However, the considered studies differ in the type of administration, in dosage, in duration of treatment, as well as in quality of research. Despite all study heterogeneity, it became evident that research of high scientific quality is in support of the efficacy of l-ascorbate in pain treatment.Oxidative stress is present in almost all pain conditions. Because oral administration of most magistral formulas of vitamin C does not provide biological availability, parenteral administration should be preferred and can be supported by an oral dose with high bioavailability on days without intravenous treatment. l-ascorbate should be preferred for parenteral high dosage, rather than ascorbic acid, as it does not release acid valences under physiological conditions.l-ascorbate is an effective, safe, and economically favorable integrative treatment option for various pain conditions, addressing the root cause of tissue damage and inflammatory mediator burst.Graphical Abstract: Pain is the most common reason for seeking medical treatment. Despite extensive research efforts and effective analgesics modulating pain, there is still a major therapeutic gap in addressing the root causes of pain. Pain is associated with tissue damage induced by oxidative stress and induction of inflammatory mediators following high consumption of antioxidants. The role of antioxidants in general, and the administration of l-ascorbate in particular, is still controversially discussed and underestimated in the daily clinical practice.The current literature on the therapeutic effect of l-ascorbate, ascorbic acid, and vitamin C on various pain conditions was evaluated against the background of evidence-based medicine. Those articles, obtained from systematic search in PubMed, were critically assessed and rated in terms of evidence level and methodological quality by two independent experts. The primary purpose of this work was to establish specific pain therapy guidance for intravenous l-ascorbate.A PubMed search revealed 14 suitable articles comprising controlled clinical trials and meta-analyses. An additional ten publications could be identified via secondary literature. There is supporting evidence for the efficacy of ascorbate treatment in inflammatory pain conditions, in the complex regional pain syndrome, in post zoster neuralgia, in neuropathic pain, in post-operative pain conditions, and in tumor-related pain. However, the considered studies differ in the type of administration, in dosage, in duration of treatment, as well as in quality of research. Despite all study heterogeneity, it became evident that research of high scientific quality is in support of the efficacy of l-ascorbate in pain treatment.Oxidative stress is present in almost all pain conditions. Because oral administration of most magistral formulas of vitamin C does not provide biological availability, parenteral administration should be preferred and can be supported by an oral dose with high bioavailability on days without intravenous treatment. l-ascorbate should be preferred for parenteral high dosage, rather than ascorbic acid, as it does not release acid valences under physiological conditions.l-ascorbate is an effective, safe, and economically favorable integrative treatment option for various pain conditions, addressing the root cause of tissue damage and inflammatory mediator burst. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Prevalence rates of chronic abdominal pain (CAP) and breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) are high in patients with intra-abdominal malignancies. As part of a multimodal approach, CT-guided coeliac plexus blockade (CPB) and CT-guided coeliac plexus neurolysis (CPN) are commonly used pain management strategies. The aim of this study was to evaluate pain outcomes among patients with intra-abdominal malignancies who underwent CPB and/or CPN. Methods: Patients with intra-abdominal malignancies who underwent CPB and/or CPN for pain control at the general hospital Klagenfurt am Wörthersee from 2010 to 2019 were enrolled. Results: A total of 84 procedures (24 CPB and 60 CPN) were performed on 52 patients; 62% of these patients had pancreatic cancer. CPN led to significant pain reduction and decreased BTcP intensity. Patients receiving repeated CPN showed higher individual pain reduction. Higher pre-procedural pain intensity was correlated with higher pain reduction. No difference in pain reduction in patients receiving a diagnostic CPB prior to CPN compared to patients without a diagnostic CPB was found. Higher pain reduction after CPN led to longer-lasting pain relief. The time frame from diagnosis to CPN was 472 (± 416) days. Patients experienced a mean duration of pain prior to CPN of 330 (± 53) days. The time frame from diagnosis to CPN was shorter in patients with pancreatic cancer compared to other intra-abdominal malignancies. In 58% of patients pain medication was stable or was reduced after CPN; 16% of patients complained about pain during the procedure; no major complications occurred. There was no correlation between median survival after CPN and pain outcomes. Conclusions: In patients with intra-abdominal malignancy-related CAP, CPN is a safe and effective procedure which can provide long-lasting significant relief of background pain and BTcP. As part of a multimodal approach, CPN should be considered as an earlier option for pain management in these patients. Plain Language Summary: In patients with intra-abdominal malignancy-related abdominal pain, CT-guided coeliac plexus neurolysis is a safe and effective procedure. It can provide long-lasting significant relief of background pain and breakthrough cancer pain. As part of a multimodal approach, coeliac plexus neurolysis should be considered as an earlier option for pain management in patients with intractable abdominal cancer pain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chloroprocaine is a short-acting local anaesthetic with a rapid onset of action and an anaesthesia duration up to 60 min. In this pivotal study success rates, onset and remission of motor and sensory block and safety of chloroprocaine 2% was compared to ropivacaine 0.75% for short-duration distal upper limb surgery with successful block rates as primary outcome. The study was designed as a prospective, randomised, multi-centre, active-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, non-inferiority study, performed in 4 European hospitals with 211 patients scheduled for short duration distal upper limb surgery under axillary plexus block anaesthesia. Patients received either ultrasound guided axillary block with 20 ml chloroprocaine 2%, or with 20 ml ropivacaine 0.75%. Successful block was defined as block without any supplementation in the first 45 min calculated from the time of readiness for surgery. 90.8% patients achieved a successful block with chloroprocaine 2% and 92.9% patients with Ropivacaine 0.75%, thus non-inferiority was demonstrated (10% non inferiority margin; 95% CI − 0.097, 0.039; p = 0.02). Time to onset of block was not significantly different between the groups. Median time to motor and sensory block regression was significantly shorter as was time to home discharge (164 [155–170] min for chloroprocaine versus 380 [209–450] for the ropivacaine group, p < 0.001). For short-duration surgical procedures, the short-acting Chloroprocaine 2% may be used, with success rates non-inferior to ropivacaine and a favourable safety profile. Trial registration: The trial was registered at Clinicaltrials.gov with registration number NCT02385097 (March 11th, 2015) and European Clinical Trial Database with the EudraCT number 2014-002519-40 (July 7th, 2015, Austria—BASG). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]