Search

Is it possible that a block cipher apparently immune to classical differential cryptanalysis can be attacked considering a different operation on the message space? Recently Calderini and Sala showed how to effectively compute alternative operations on a vector space which can serve as message space for a block cipher such that the resulting structure is still a vector space. The latter were used to mount a linearisation attack against a toy cipher. Here we investigate how alternative operations interact with the layers of a substitution-permutation network and show how they influence the differential probabilities, when the difference taken into consideration is different from the usual bit-wise addition modulo two. Furthermore, we design a block cipher which appears to be secure with respect to classical differential cryptanalysis, but weaker with respect to our attack which makes use of alternative operations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this paper we propose a tokenization algorithm of Reversible Hybrid type, as defined in PCI DSS guidelines for designing a tokenization solution, based on a block cipher with a secret key and (possibly public) additional input. We provide some formal proofs of security for it, which imply our algorithm satisfies the most significant security requirements described in PCI DSS tokenization guidelines. Finally, we give an instantiation with concrete cryptographic primitives and fixed length of the PAN, and we analyze its efficiency and security. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We study the relation among some security parameters for vectorial Boolean functions which prevent attacks on the related block cipher. We focus our study on a recently-introduced security criterion, called weak differential uniformity, which prevents the existence of an undetectable trapdoor based on imprimitive group action. We present some properties of functions with low weak differential uniformity, especially for the case of power functions and 4-bit S-Boxes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BEAR, LION and LIONESS are block ciphers presented by Biham and Anderson (), inspired by the famous Luby-Rackoff constructions of block ciphers from other cryptographic primitives (). The ciphers proposed by Biham and Anderson are based on one stream cipher and one hash function. Good properties of the primitives may ensure good properties of the block cipher. In particular, Biham and Anderson are able to prove that their ciphers are immune to any efficient known-plaintext key-recovery attack that can use as input only one plaintext-ciphertext pair. Our contribution is showing that these ciphers are actually immune to any efficient known-plaintext key-recovery attack that can use as input any number of plaintext-ciphertext pairs. We are able to get this improvement by using slightly different hypotheses on the primitives. We also discuss the attack by Morin (). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]