Search

Introduction: Skin ulcers (SU) represent one of the most frequent manifestations of systemic sclerosis (SSc), occurring in almost 50% of scleroderma patients. SSc-SU are often particularly difficult to treat with conventional systemic and local therapies. In this study, a preliminary evaluation of the role and effectiveness of blue light photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy with EmoLED® in the treatment of scleroderma skin ulcers (SSc-SU) was performed. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 12 consecutive SSc patients with a total of 15 SU on finger hands. All patients were treated with adequate systemic therapy and local treatment for SU; after a standard skin ulcer bed preparation with debridement of all lesions, EmoLED® was performed. All patients were locally treated every week during 2 months of follow-up; SU data were collected after 4 weeks (T4) and 8 weeks (T8). Eight SSc patients with comparable SU were also evaluated as controls. Results: The application of EmoLED® in addition to debridement apparently produced faster healing of SU. Complete healing of SU was recorded in 41.6% cases during EmoLED® treatment. Significant improvements in SU area, length, and width, wound bed, and related pain were observed in EmoLED® patients from T0 to T8. Control subjects treated with standard systemic/local therapies merely showed an amelioration of SU area and width at the end of the follow-up. No procedural or post-procedural adverse events were reported. Conclusions: The positive clinical results and the absence of side effects suggest that EmoLED® could be a promising tool in the management of SSc-SU, with an interesting role to play in the healing process in addition to conventional systemic and local treatments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an autoimmune disease characterized by endothelial dysfunction, which is also associated with other disorders, such as atherosclerosis. The direct role of SSc in facilitating cardiovascular events should be clarified. We compared the prevalence of established coronary artery disease (CAD) between SSc and type 2 diabetes, a well-known phenotype associated with high cardiovascular risk. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we evaluated a cohort of 290 unselected female SSc patients, in comparison with 265 aged-matched female type 2 diabetics. "Established CAD" was defined as previous myocardial infarction, unstable angina or ischemia documented by ECG and troponin elevation, necessity/previous treatment with coronary angioplasty or stenting. Age subgroups < 45 (Q1), 45–54 (Q2), 55–64 (Q3), 65–74 (Q4), and ≥ 75 (Q5) years were considered for SSc and diabetes. Results: CAD prevalence resulted lower in SSc patients than in diabetics (10% (95%CI 6.9–14.1) versus 19.2% (95%CI 14.9–24.4); p = 0.0023). In Q2 patients, CAD never occurred in SSc (95%CI 0–8.4), but in 9.4% of diabetics (95%CI 3.7–20.7, p = 0.0567); in Q3 subjects, CAD was reported in 5.6% (95%CI 1.8–13.8) of SSc, but in 20% (95%CI 12.4–30.5) of diabetics (p = 0.0127). Instead, for Q4 and particularly Q5 patients, CAD prevalence was comparable in SSc and diabetes. Conclusions: The prevalence of established CAD in SSc was lower compared with diabetics. However, in older SSc patients the prevalence of CAD was similar to that observed in diabetics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]