Search

Objectives: To validate a method for performing myocardial segmentation based on coronary anatomy using coronary CT angiography (CCTA).Methods: Coronary artery-based myocardial segmentation (CAMS) was developed for use with CCTA. To validate and compare this method with the conventional American Heart Association (AHA) classification, a single coronary occlusion model was prepared and validated using six pigs. The unstained occluded coronary territories of the specimens and corresponding arterial territories from CAMS and AHA segmentations were compared using slice-by-slice matching and 100 virtual myocardial columns.Results: CAMS more precisely predicted ischaemic area than the AHA method, as indicated by 95% versus 76% (p < 0.001) of the percentage of matched columns (defined as percentage of matched columns of segmentation method divided by number of unstained columns in the specimen). According to the subgroup analyses, CAMS demonstrated a higher percentage of matched columns than the AHA method in the left anterior descending artery (100% vs. 77%; p < 0.001) and mid- (99% vs. 83%; p = 0.046) and apical-level territories of the left ventricle (90% vs. 52%; p = 0.011).Conclusions: CAMS is a feasible method for identifying the corresponding myocardial territories of the coronary arteries using CCTA.Key Points: • CAMS is a feasible method for identifying corresponding coronary territory using CTA • CAMS is more accurate in predicting coronary territory than the AHA method • The AHA method may underestimate the ischaemic territory of LAD stenosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]