Search

Background: Routine total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a short cemented stem as compared with a standard length cemented stem may have benefits in terms of stress distribution, bone preservation, stem subsidence and ease of revision surgery. Two senior arthroplasty surgeons transitioned their routine femoral implant from a standard 150 mm Exeter V40 cemented stem to a short 125 mm Exeter V40 cemented stem for all patients over the course of several years. We analysed revision rates, adjusted survival, and PROMS scores for patients who received a standard stem and a short stem in routine THA. Methods: All THAs performed by the two surgeons between January 2011 and December 2021 were included. All procedures were performed using either a 150 mm or 125 mm Exeter V40 stem. Demographic data, acetabular implant type, and outcome data including implant survival, reason for revision, and post-operative Oxford Hip Scores were obtained from the New Zealand Joint Registry (NZJR), and detailed survival analyses were performed. Primary outcome was revision for any reason. Reason for revision, including femoral or acetabular failure, and time to revision were also recorded. Results: 1335 THAs were included. 516 using the 150 mm stem and 819 using the 125 mm stem. There were 4055.5 and 3227.8 component years analysed in the standard stem and short stem groups respectively due to a longer mean follow up in the 150 mm group. Patient reported outcomes were comparable across all groups. Revision rates were comparable between the standard 150 mm stem (0.44 revisions/100 component years) and the short 125 mm stem (0.56 revisions/100 component years) with no statistically significant difference found (p = 0.240). Conclusion: Routine use of a short 125 mm stem had no statistically significant impact on revision rate or PROMS scores when compared to a standard 150 mm stem. There may be benefits to routine use of a short cemented femoral implant. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: A total of 894 hips were evaluated to describe the survivorship of Exeter cemented femoral stems and report the outcomes and complications of our 'Exeter- era', and there is no study from Central or Eastern Europe demonstrating similar results. Methods: Between January 2000 and December 2009, a total of 894 hips were included who underwent Exeter universal and V40 femoral stems with a mean follow up of 13 years. Cemented Exeter low profile polyethylene cups were used in 889 patients (99.4%) cups. Harris hip score (HHS) was used and statistical outcome measures were calculated with revision as an endpoint for aseptic loosening of the stem, aseptic loosening of any component, all-cause revision of the stem, and all-cause revision of the hip. Results: A total of 103 patients died and 129 (14.4%) operated hips were lost to follow-up before ten years. Out of the 662, ten stems (1.5%) were revised for aseptic loosening. Aseptic loosening of any component was the reason for revision in 43 cases (6.5%), consisting of 40 cup revisions and ten stem exchanges. Periprosthetic fracture occurred in 17 cases (1.9%) Periprosthetic joint infection occurred in 18 cases (2.01%). Three cups were exchanged for recurrent dislocation, and two stems had broken. Conclusion: Exeter hip system has provided reproducible results across different centres worldwide, as it did in our series. Thorough surgical and cementing technique is of utmost importance for achieving these results. The cup is the weak point of the system and use of a hybrid system is worth considering. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]