1. Impact of 18F-FDG PET/MR based tumor delineation in radiotherapy planning for cholangiocarcinoma.
- Author
-
Delaby, Gauthier, Ataeinia, Bahar, Wo, Jennifer, Catalano, Onofrio Antonio, and Heidari, Pedram
- Subjects
CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA ,COMPUTED tomography ,MAGNETIC resonance imaging ,FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F18 ,POSITRON emission tomography ,DIAGNOSIS - Abstract
Purpose: Radiation therapy (RT) is an effective treatment for unresectable cholangiocarcinoma (CC). Accurate tumor volume delineation is critical in achieving high rates of local control while minimizing treatment-related toxicity. This study compares
18 F-FDG PET/MR to MR and CT for target volume delineation for RT planning. Methods: We retrospectively included 22 patients with newly diagnosed unresectable primary CC who underwent18 F-FDG PET/MR for initial staging. Gross tumor volume (GTV) of the primary mass (GTVM ) and lymph nodes (GTVLN ) were contoured on CT images, MR images, and PET/MR fused images and compared among modalities. The dice similarity coefficient (DSC) was calculated to assess spatial coverage between different modalities. Results: GTVM PET/MR (median: 94 ml, range 16–655 ml) was significantly greater than GTVM MR (69 ml, 11–635 ml) (p = 0.0001) and GTVM CT (96 ml, 4–564 ml) (p = 0.035). There was no significant difference between GTVM CT and GTVM MR (p = 0.078). Subgroup analysis of intrahepatic and extrahepatic tumors showed that the median GTVM PET/MR was significantly greater than GTVM MR in both groups (117.5 ml, 22–655 ml vs. 102.5 ml, 22–635 ml, p = 0.004 and 37 ml, 16–303 ml vs. 34 ml, 11–207 ml, p = 0.042, respectively). The GTVLN PET/MR (8.5 ml, 1–27 ml) was significantly higher than GTVLN CT (5 ml, 4–16 ml) (p = 0.026). GTVPET/MR had the highest similarity to the GTVMR , i.e., DSCPET/MR-MR (0.82, 0.25–1.00), compared to DSCPET/MR-CT of 0.58 (0.22–0.87) and DSCMR-CT of 0.58 (0.03–0.83). Conclusion:18 F-FDG PET/MR-based CC delineation yields greater GTVs and detected a higher number of positive lymph nodes compared to CT or MR, potentially improving RT planning by reducing the risk of geographic misses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF