Search

Introduction: To investigate the differences in the incidence rates of suspected stage 0/1 osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) and incidence risk of relevant clinical findings of suspected stage 0 ONJ between patients treated with sequential therapy comprising weekly teriparatide for 72 weeks followed by alendronate for 48 weeks vs. those who received monotherapy with alendronate for 120 weeks. Materials and methods: Suspected stage 0/1 ONJ was defined by non-specific symptoms. Tooth mobility and periodontal symptoms (gingival bleeding, swelling, and/or pain) were selected as clinical findings of suspected stage 0 ONJ. Poisson regression models were applied to calculate the incidence rate ratios of suspected stage 0/1 between the teriparatide group (TG) and alendronate group (AG). Generalized linear models were used to calculate the risk ratios of clinical findings between groups. Results: Two hundred and sixty-one participants in the TG and 344 in the AG answered a structured questionnaire on oral health and were included in this study. There were no significant differences between the groups in the incidence rate of suspected stage 0/1 ONJ at both 72 and 120 weeks. The risk ratio of the TG to AG for tooth mobility was 0.34 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13–0.88, p = 0.02) at 72 weeks and 0.90 (95% CI 0.40–2.03, p = 0.83) at 120 weeks. The incidence rate of tooth mobility related to periodontal symptoms decreased in the TG and increased in the AG during the study. Conclusion: Tooth mobility accompanied by clinical periodontal symptoms may be a useful early sign of stage 0 ONJ. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: A 2015 survey of the Japan Osteoporosis Society (JOS) on medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) revealed that cooperation between physicians and dentists was poor. Discontinuation of antiresorptive agents before tooth extraction was found to increase adverse events without preventing MRONJ. We compared this 2015 survey with a new survey conducted in 2022 to investigate cooperation between physicians and dentists for MRONJ. Materials and methods: A web-based structured questionnaire including 13 key queries was sent to 3813 physicians who were members of JOS, and 1227 (32.2%) responses were received. Results: Of the 1227 respondents, 909 (74.1%) had complied with a discontinuation request from a dentist before tooth extraction, although 25.4% of medications were not related to the incidence of MRONJ. Of these, 177 respondents reported 252 adverse events including 10 (1.3%) cases of MRONJ. The prevalence of fractures increased from 4.8% in 2015 to 8.2% in 2022. The rates of respondents who requested oral health care by a dentist before antiresorptive agent therapy and reported cooperation between physicians and dentists were 72.7% and 42.4% in 2022 compared with 32.9% and 24.8% in 2015, respectively. The rates of cooperation among the 47 prefectures in Japan were significantly different, ranging from 10.0 to 83.3% (p = 0.02). Conclusion: This study confirmed increased cooperation between physicians and dentists for MRONJ in Japan. However, a more equal distribution of cooperation across Japan is necessary to optimally manage MRONJ. Discontinuation of antiresorptive agents is no longer necessary because fractures during discontinuation continue to increase in Japan. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) associated with bisphosphonate therapy is a rare but severe side effect in osteoporosis patients. Recently, the number of osteoporosis patients with ONJ has dramatically increased in Japan. This has contributed to an increase in the number of patients avoiding extractions. However, there has been no prospective study providing definitive incidence data for ONJ in Japanese patients. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the true as well as suspected incidence of ONJ. A total of 3229 subjects (1612 subjects in the minodronic acid group and 1617 subjects in the raloxifene group) in the Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial protocol number 4 participated in this study. ONJ was diagnosed by experienced dentists. Suspected Stage 0 and 1 (bone exposure of the jaw) ONJ was assessed by a structured questionnaire at baseline and at 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. No established ONJ cases were diagnosed during the study. The incidence of suspected Stage 0 and/or Stage 1 ONJ was 6.14 per 1000 patient-years in the minodronic acid group and 3.38 per 1000 patient-years in the raloxifene group [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) = 1.82 (0.84-3.93), P = 0.13]. Approximately 50-60% of bone exposures that appeared during the study had disappeared at the next observation. Although the subjects in this study may have developed a greater interest in the health of the oral cavity, the incidence of ONJ after minodronic acid treatment would be lower than the expected incident rate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Antiresorptive agent-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (ARONJ) is an intractable, though rare, complication in cancer patients with bone metastases and patients with osteoporosis who are treated with antiresorptive agents, including bisphosphonates and denosumab. Despite the more than 10 years that have passed since the first cases of bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) were reported, our understanding of the epidemiology and pathophysiology of ARONJ remains limited, and data supported by evidence-based medicine are still sparse. However, the diagnosis and staging of ARONJ, identification of risk factors, and development of preventive and therapeutic approaches have advanced significantly over the past decade. The Position Paper 2017 is an updated version of the Position Paper 2010 of the Japanese Allied Committee on Osteonecrosis of the Jaw, which now comprises six Japanese academic societies. The Position Paper 2017 describes a new diagnostic definition for ARONJ, as proposed by the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (AAOMS), summarizes our current understanding of the pathophysiology of ARONJ based on a literature search, and suggests methods for physicians and dentists/oral surgeons to manage the disease. In addition, the appropriateness of discontinuing antiresorptive medications (drug holiday) before, during, and after invasive dental treatments is discussed extensively. More importantly, the manuscript also proposes, for the first time, the importance of interactive communication and cooperation between physicians and dentists/oral surgeons for the successful treatment of ARONJ. The Position Paper 2017 is intended to serve as a guide for improving the management of ARONJ patients in Japan. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dentists request a discontinuation of antiresorptive agents, such as bisphosphonate, before and after tooth extractions to prevent osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ). However, little is known about how this affects ONJ and osteoporosis treatment and how medical professionals and dentists cooperate to treat ONJ in patients with osteoporosis. This study aimed to clarify the impact of ONJ on osteoporosis treatment in Japan. A structured questionnaire including 14 key clinical queries was sent to 488 medical professionals as part of the Japanese Osteoporosis Intervention Trial (JOINT)-04, and 206 responses were received. A total of 173 respondents had received discontinuation requests from dentists. Of these, 28 respondents experienced 30 adverse events including ten fractures and one incidence of ONJ. The respondents who refused discontinuation requests observed no cases of ONJ. Approximately 16 % of respondents had patients who discontinued osteoporosis treatment, following a requested drug discontinuation, after tooth extraction. Dentists requested discontinuations for many medications that were not associated with the incidence of ONJ. Approximately 76 % of respondents had never requested oral health care from dentists before osteoporosis treatment and 72 % reported no cooperation between dentists and medical professionals in their region. Our results suggest that drug discontinuation may increase adverse events and disturb osteoporosis treatment without completely preventing ONJ. Currently, both medical professionals and dentists in Japan still continue to recommend their own treatment position. A forum to share information about ONJ among medical professionals, dentists, and patients is required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) is becoming common in Japan. Oral and maxillofacial radiologists must diagnose BRONJ in general practice. However, little information on how to recognise BRONJ is available. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to confirm the recognition of BRONJ among Japanese oral and maxillofacial radiologists. Methods: A questionnaire including 14 main queries and relevant branch queries was created and sent to 29 Japanese institutions employing oral and maxillofacial radiologists. Results: A large number of patients (705) with BRONJ during the last 3 years were reported by 23 institutions (25 responders) that participated in our survey. The rate of osteonecrosis of the jaw associated with intravenous bisphosphonates was almost identical to that associated with oral bisphosphonates. This finding was inconsistent with worldwide data. About half of the responders felt that the diagnosis of BRONJ based on imaging was difficult. No specific modality was selected for identifying the early signs of BRONJ, although 19 responders selected multi-detector computed tomography followed by magnetic resonance imaging as the best modality for determining the extent of BRONJ. Almost all responders felt that the detection of early signs and determination of lesion extent on imaging were important roles of oral and maxillofacial radiologists. Conclusions: Oral and maxillofacial radiologists recognised their roles in BRONJ diagnosis; however, insufficient evidence regarding the accomplishment of these roles is available. Japanese oral and maxillofacial radiologists must accumulate a large number of BRONJ images, analyse them in cooperation with one another and share the information obtained from their analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Bisphosphonates (BPs) have been widely, efficiently, and safely used for the treatment of osteoporosis, malignant hypercalcemia, bone metastasis of solid cancers, and multiple myeloma bone diseases. Accumulating recent reports describe that surgical dental treatments in patients with cancer or osteoporosis who have been receiving intravenous or oral BPs are associated with osteonecrosis of the jaw (bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw, BRONJ). The accurate incidence, clinical backgrounds, and pathogenesis of BRONJ have been unclear and appropriate approaches for prevention and treatment have not been established to date. To address the current situation of BRONJ in Japan, the "Allied Task Force Committee of Bisphosphonate-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw," consisting of physicians specializing in bone biology, orthopedic surgery, rheumatology, obstetrics/gynecology, and medical oncology and dentists specializing in oral surgery, periodontology, dental radiology, and oral pathology, was organized. The committee attempted to propose a standard position paper for the treatment of BRONJ. The committee expects that this proposal will provide objective and correct scientific information on BRONJ and will serve as a reference for conducting dental procedures for patients receiving BPs and in designing prevention and treatment of BRONJ. However, because this position paper is not based on direct clinical evidence, it should be used as a reference, and a decision on treatment in each case should be made after an extensive discussion among physicians, dentists/oral surgeons, and the patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An erratum to the article "Antiresorptive agent-related osteonecrosis of the jaw: Position Paper 2017 of the Japanese Allied Committee on Osteonecrosis of the Jaw" that was published in the January 25, 2017 issue is presented.