Search

Purpose: We undertook a meta-analysis of randomized trials to evaluate the efficacy of multitargeted antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors (MATKIs) in addition to chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer. Methods: PubMed, Web of Knowledge databases and the ASCO meeting abstracts were searched for eligible literature published up to August 30, 2013. The endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR) and toxicities. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for survival outcomes and odds ratio (ORs) for dichotomous data with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were derived. Results: Eight studies including 2,077 participants were analyzed. Compared to chemotherapy alone, adding MATKIs to chemotherapy resulted in a 14 % risk reduction of PFS events. However, the benefit did not reach statistical significance (HR 0.86; 95 % CI 0.70-1.04, P = 0.126). Also, no OS benefit was observed (HR 1.03; 95 % CI 0.89-1.18, P = 0.724). The addition of MATKIs significantly increased the ORR (OR 1.57; 95 % CI 1.30-1.91, P = 0.000). Subgroup analysis revealed that sorafinib showed a significantly greater effect on PFS in patients with HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer (HR 0.67; 95 % CI 0.55-0.82, P = 0.000) in comparison to chemotherapy alone. Additionally, sunitinib seemed to have no substantial efficacy for metastatic breast cancer. Toxicities were more frequent in patients receiving MATKIs. Conclusion: Overall, regimens consisting of MATKIs seemed not to be superior to chemotherapy alone in terms of PFS and OS, although significant improvement in ORR was observed. However, the addition of sorafenib significantly improved PFS. Further studies are needed to corroborate this finding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Regorafenib is a novel multikinase inhibitor approved for use in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and locally advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). Hypertension is one of the major adverse events of this agent, but to date the incidence and risk of hypertension with regorafenib have not been systematically investigated. We have conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of published clinical trials to determine its overall incidence and risk. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science and abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meetings were searched to identify relevant studies published up to September 9, 2013. Eligible studies were prospective phase II or III clinical trials using regorafenib in cancer patients with data on hypertension available. The incidence and relative risk (RR) of hypertension were calculated using a random-effects model. Results: Data from a total of 1,069 patients (regorafenib n = 750; controls n = 319) from five clinical trials were included for analysis. The overall incidence of all-grade and high-grade hypertension were 44.4 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 30.8-59.0 %) and 12.5 % (95 % CI 5.2-27.1 %), respectively. The use of regorafenib in cancer patients was associated with a significantly increased risk of all-grade (RR 3.76, 95 % CI 2.35-5.99) and high-grade (RR, 8.39, 95 % CI 3.10-22.71) hypertension. The risk might vary with tumor types ( P = 0.000). Conclusions: Patients with cancer receiving regorafenib have a significantly higher risk of developing hypertension. Close monitoring and appropriate management of this hypertension are strongly recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]