Search

Background: Bipolar hemiarthroplasty is the standard of care for transcervical fracture in the elderly. Stainless steel being cheaper is preferred over titanium in developing nations for implants and prostheses. This study was conducted for assessing the short-term outcomes of uncemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty done using hydroxyapatite-coated stainless steel prosthesis. Methods: Sixty-five patients, >60 year of age operated between 2018 and 2020 at tertiary care centre with stainless steel (316L) completely coated with hydroxyapatite bipolar hemiarthroplasty implants were retrospectively followed up. Radiological outcomes were assessed based on pedestal formation, stem position, radiological limb length discrepancy, sinkage of stem, spot welds and stress shielding. Clinical and functional outcomes were assessed based on mean Harris Hip score. Results: Mean Harris Hip score at baseline, 3-week follow-up, 6-week follow-up, 3-month follow-up and 1-year follow-up was 45.9 (SD 2.5), 63.2 (SD 6.5), 75.1 (SD 9.9), 83.9 (SD 9.8) and 87.1 (SD 9.9), respectively. Excellent, good, fair, poor results were seen in 32.31, 40, 18.46, 9.23 of the patients, respectively. Valgus, central and varus stem position was seen in 49.23, 40, 10.77 percent of the patients, respectively. Pedestal formation, radiological limb length discrepancy, sinkage, spot welds, stress shielding was seen in 6.15, 32.31, 3.07, 53.85, 40 percent of the patients, respectively. Conclusion: Short-term outcomes of this study provides evidence that using a more affordable fully hydroxyapatite-coated stainless steel prosthesis for uncemented bipolar hemiarthroplasty is an appropriate treatment option for the transcervical femur fracture. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Objective of the study was to evaluate and compare psychometric properties such as validity, reliability, floor ceiling effects and interpretability of the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and the Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) in patients undergoing bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture in Indian patients, because this has not been done before. Methods: This observational study consisted of 40 consecutively operated patients. Construct validity and reliability were evaluated using correlation coefficient and Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), respectively. Interpretability was evaluated by describing mean and standard deviation of mHHS and FJS in five subgroups of patients based on their response to the global rating questions and assessment. Results: The mean follow-up duration was 15.7 months ± 10.4. There was very high correlation between mHHS and FJS (r = 0.92, p < 0.0001) suggesting convergent construct validity. The results of correlation coefficient were 100% and 66.7% in accordance with the pre-formulated hypotheses for mHHS and FJS, respectively. mHHS and FJS demonstrated adequate construct validity and inadequate construct validity, respectively. The ICC value for mHHS and FJS was 0.80 (p = 0.005) {adequate reliability} and 0.34 (p = 0.06) {inadequate reliability}, respectively. Both mHHS and FJS-12 demonstrated acceptable level of floor (0% for mHHS and 14.3% for FJS) and ceiling effects (12.5% for both mHHS and FJS). There was significant difference in the mHHS and FJS in the five subgroups of patients suggesting adequate interpretability. Conclusion: We recommend the use of the modified Harris Hip Score over the Forgotten Joint Score for functional outcome evaluation of Indian patients from rural setting undergoing bipolar hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fracture. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]