Search

Background: Despite high expression of PD-L1, around half of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) will not experience tumor response with pembrolizumab. There is an need for a better understanding of the resistance mechanisms in this setting. Methods: This bi-centric retrospective study included all consecutive patients with PDL1 ≥ 50% advanced NSCLC treated with pembrolizumab in first-line treatment between 2016 and 2020. We compared the clinical characteristics of patients with early progression (refractory) vs others. We performed a comprehensive gene expression profile screening by RNAseq capture on tumor samples. Results: We included 46 patients. Twenty-two patients were refractory to pembrolizumab, mainly women, with poor performance status and lower albumin concentration. RNAseq analysis was performed on 19 samples. Hierarchical clustering allowed the identification of 3 clusters with various proportion of refractory tumors: intermediate (C1: 57%), high (C2: 71%) and low proportion (C3: 40%). Comparative analysis between C2 and C3 allowed the identification of overexpressed (n = 137) and underexpressed (n = 40) genes. Among the genes of interest, C2 exhibits higher activation of pathways associated with stemness phenotype (Hedgehog, Notch and Hippo pathways) and pathways associated with loss of PTEN and JAK2. In C2, genes associated with PD-1, toll-like receptor-9 (TLR-9), major histocompatibility complex (MHC) and interferon-γ pathways were underexpressed. Conclusion: This study gives an overview of activated and downregulated pathways in high PD-L1 NSCLC refractory to pembrolizumab. These tumors showed activation of pathways associated with cancer stem cells, loss of PTEN and JAK2, and inhibition of both priming and effector phases of the immune response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of the present article is to contribute to the development of the Desire-Belief-Opportunity-model from a symbolic interactionist perspective. The main argument is that this model needs to incorporate the classical notion of definition of the situation to be able to account for the formative impact of interaction on the formation of actor's beliefs, as well as the complex interdependency between two of its key components, namely the beliefs and the action opportunities of the actor. It is argued that the theoretical advancement of the DBO-model in this particular direction is not only feasible but also brings it considerably closer to the analytical refinement and the empirical validation it currently lacks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]