Search

The paper provides a complete characterization of Nash equilibria for games in which n candidates choose a strategy in the form of a platform, each from a circle of feasible platforms, with the aim of maximizing the stretch of the circle from where the candidate's platform will receive support from the voters. Using this characterization, it is shown that if the sum of all players' payoffs is 1, the Nash equilibrium payoff of each player in an arbitrary Nash equilibrium must be restricted to the interval [ 1 / 2 (n - 1) , 2 / (n + 1) ]. This implies that in an election with four candidates, a candidate who is attracting less than one-sixth of the voters can do better by changing his or her strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acetyl chloride is one of the most commonly available and cheap acylating agent but its high reactivity and concomitant instability in water precludes its use to carry out acetylation in aqueous medium. The present methodology illustrates the efficient acetylation of primary amines and amino acids in brine solution by means of acetyl chloride under weakly basic condition in the presence of sodium acetate and/or triethyl amine followed by trituration with aqueous saturated bicarbonate solution. This effort represents the first efficient use of this most reactive but cheap acetylating agent to acetylate amines in excellent yields in aqueous medium. This is a potentially useful green chemical transformation where reaction takes place in environment-friendly brine solution leading to easy work-up and isolation of the amide derivatives. Mechanistic rationale of this methodology is also important. [Figure not available: see fulltext.] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article investigates behavior in the Traveler's Dilemma game and isolates deviations from textbook predictions caused by differences in welfare perceptions and strategic miscalculations. It presents the results of an experimental analysis based on a 2 × 2 design where the own and the other subject's bonus-penalty parameters are changed independently. We find that the change in own bonus-penalty alone entirely explains the effect on claims of a simultaneous change in one's own and the other's bonus-penalty. An increase in the other subject's bonus-penalty has a significant negative effect on claims when the own bonus-penalty is low, whereas it does not have a significant effect when the own bonus-penalty is high. We also find that expected claims are inconsistent with actual claims in the asymmetric treatments. Focusing on reported strategies, we document substantial heterogeneity and show that changes in choices across treatments are largely explained by risk aversion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

It can be argued that just as there are different kinds of literacy, there are different kinds of illiteracy. A “proximate illiterate,” i.e. an illiterate who has easy access to a literate person, is clearly better off than someone without such access. The existing literature that takes account of these differences (1) defines an illiterate person to be a proximate illiterate if he or she lives in a household with at least one literate person and (2) derives new measures of literacy which typically exceed the standard literacy rate. The latter risks generating policy complacency. The aim of this paper is to suggest a measure of literacy that is not limited by (1) and (2). The measure is axiomatically characterized and its use is illustrated with a numerical exercise for the provinces of South Africa. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

It is a widely accepted principle of economics that if two or more adults voluntarily agree to a contract or an exchange that has no negative fall-out on others, then the government should not stop such a contract. This is often called the ‘principle of free contract’ (PFC). There is a body of writing in economics which upholds the PFC. Yet this ubiquitous principle is ill-defined and full of ambiguities. For instance, since it refers to voluntary choice, its proper use presumes an understanding of what is ‘voluntary’ and, therefore, also, of what is coercive. What is ironic is that, while philosophers and legal scholars have debated and analyzed these concepts and the validity of the principle of free contract, there is very little discussion of these in economics, even though so much of economics is founded on this principle. This has caused a lot of policy confusion. The aim of this paper is to construct general rules for when we may violate the PFC. The argument is constructed within the Paretian framework. Hence, the violation of the PFC is not justified by appeal to deontological ethics or non-welfarist criteria. This is not an easy task since the principle of free contract is often viewed as a rule that is a derivative of the Pareto principle. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Hashimoto's encephalopathy, also known as steroid responsive encephalopathy associated with autoimmune thyroiditis (SREAT) is an autoimmune neuroendocrine disorder marked by impaired brain function. It is a diagnosis of exclusion with variable nature of presentation and no gold standard investigation of choice. Case presentation: Here, we report a case of SREAT in a 26-year-old female who presented to our Emergency Department with altered sensorium and generalised tonic clonic seizures. After thorough clinical examination and initial resuscitation, a provisional diagnosis of neuroglycopenic injury or possible encephalitis was made. Broad-spectrum antibiotics were initiated. Routine investigations and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) study were inconclusive except for neutrophilic leucocytosis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) depicted hyper-intense signal changes around bilateral hippocampus and thalamus. Serum anti-thyroid peroxidase (anti-TPO) was strongly positive while other serum and CSF autoantibodies were within normal limits. A diagnosis of SREAT was made and she responded brilliantly to systemic corticosteroids. Incidentally, anti-SSA (anti-Ro) and anti-SSB (anti-La) were positive and a possible association between Sjogren's syndrome and SREAT was insinuated. Conclusion: There is a long list of differentials for SREAT and a proper diagnostic criteria must be followed to reach at a conclusion. It can be easily missed and remain underreported due to its overlapping nature and ambiguous presentation. Hence, clinicians must have high index of suspicion for the disease and optimal therapy should be initiated early to improve the long term mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Reference 1 Das D, Sanghai R, Jana K, Basu K, Ghosh J, Sarkar A. Streaming through a case of SREAT. B Correction: Egypt J Neurol Psychiatry Neurosurg (2023) 59:68 b https://doi.org/10.1186/s41983-023-00669-9 After publication of this article [[1]], the authors reported that the first author (Das) should be affiliated to affiliation 1 only (and not to affiliation 6), and that the last author (Sarkar) should be affiliated to affiliation 6 (and not 5). The original article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1186/s41983-023-00669-9. [Extracted from the article]