Search

Administrative data may provide valuable information for monitoring the quality of care at population level and offer an efficient way of gathering data on individual patterns of care, and also to shed light on inequalities in access to appropriate medical care. The aim of the study was to investigate the role of patient and hospital characteristics in the initial treatment of early breast cancer using administrative data. Incident breast cancer patients were identified from hospital discharge records and linked to the radiotherapy outpatient database during 2000–2004 in the Piedmont region of Northwestern Italy. Women treated with breast-conserving surgery followed by radiotherapy (BCS + RT) were compared to those treated with BCS without radiotherapy (BCS w/o RT) or mastectomy using multinomial logistic regression models. Out of 16,022 incident cases, 46.2% received BCS + RT, 20.3% received BCS w/o RT, and 33.5% received a mastectomy. Compared to BCS + RT, the factors associated with BCS w/o RT were: increased age (OR = 1.54; 95% CI = 1.29–1.85, for ages 70–79 vs. <50), being unmarried (1.24; 1.13–1.36), presence of co-morbidities (1.32; 1.10–1.58), being treated at hospitals with low surgical volume (1.31; 1.07–1.60 for hospitals with less than 50 vs. ≥150 interventions/year), and living far from radiotherapy facilities (1.75; 1.39–2.20 for those at a distance of >45 min). These same factors were also associated with mastectomy. During the 5-year period observed, there was a trend of reduced probability of receiving a mastectomy (0.70; 0.56–0.88 for 2004 vs. 2000). The presence or absence of nodal involvement was positively associated with mastectomy (2.28; 1.83–2.85) and negatively associated with BCS w/o RT (0.65; 0.56–0.76). After adjustment for potential confounders, education level did not show any association with the type of treatment. Social and geographical factors, in addition to hospital specialization, should be considered to reduce inappropriateness of care for breast cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Oral capecitabine (Xeloda) is an effective drug with favourable safety in adjuvant and metastatic colorectal cancer. Oxaliplatin-based therapy is becoming standard for Dukes' C colon cancer in patients suitable for combination therapy, but is not yet approved by the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) in the adjuvant setting. Adjuvant capecitabine is at least as effective as 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV), with significant superiority in relapse-free survival and a trend towards improved disease-free and overall survival. We assessed the cost-effectiveness of adjuvant capecitabine from payer (UK National Health Service (NHS)) and societal perspectives. We used clinical trial data and published sources to estimate incremental direct and societal costs and gains in quality-adjusted life months (QALMs). Acquisition costs were higher for capecitabine than 5-FU/LV, but higher 5-FU/LV administration costs resulted in 57% lower chemotherapy costs for capecitabine. Capecitabine vs 5-FU/LV-associated adverse events required fewer medications and hospitalisations (cost savings pound3653). Societal costs, including patient travel/time costs, were reduced by >75% with capecitabine vs 5-FU/LV (cost savings pound1318), with lifetime gain in QALMs of 9 months. Medical resource utilisation is significantly decreased with capecitabine vs 5-FU/LV, with cost savings to the NHS and society. Capecitabine is also projected to increase life expectancy vs 5-FU/LV. Cost savings and better outcomes make capecitabine a preferred adjuvant therapy for Dukes' C colon cancer. This pharmacoeconomic analysis strongly supports replacing 5-FU/LV with capecitabine in the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer in the UK. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cisplatin, paclitaxel and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) have demonstrated significant activity in patients with advanced squamous head and neck cancer (HNSCC) despite relevant toxicity. A weekly administration of cisplatin and paclitaxel with continuous infusion of 5-FU could offer a better toxicity profile without affecting dose intensity or treatment outcome. We evaluated the toxicity and the activity of weekly cisplatin/paclitaxel with continuous infusion 5-FU in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic HNSCC. Methods: A total of 44 patients were studied. Treatment consisted of two 6-week cycles with weekly cisplatin 20 mg/m² and paclitaxel 60 mg/m² and daily continuous infusion 5-FU 200 mg/m² from day 1 to 42. Patients were evaluated for toxicity and response. Results: 40 out of 44 patients were evaluable for response. After two cycles we observed seven complete responses (16%) and 12 partial responses (27%), with a 43% (95% CI 28-58%) overall response rate. Stable disease was seen in 13 patients (29%) and progressive disease in 12 patients (27%). Toxicity was mild in treated patients: we observed less than 10% of grade ¾ hematological and gastroenteric toxicity. Conclusions: A weekly schedule of cisplatin and paclitaxel associated with continuous infusion 5-FU showed low toxicity in the treatment of advanced HNSCC while significant activity was conserved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We investigated the activity and toxicity of a combination of vinorelbine (VNB), paclitaxel (PTX) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) continuous infusion administered as first-line chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer patients pretreated with adjuvant anthracyclines. A total of 61 patients received a regimen consisting of VNB 25 mg m(-2) on days 1 and 15, PTX 60 mg m(-2) on days 1, 8 and 15 and continuous infusion of 5-FU at 200 mg m(-2) every day. Cycles were repeated every 28 days. Disease response was evaluated by both RECIST and World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Objective responses were recorded in 39 of 61 patients (64.0%) assessed by WHO and in 36 of 50 patients (72.0%) assessable by RECIST criteria. Complete remission occurred in 15 (24.6%) and 14 patients (28.0%), respectively. The median time to progression and overall survival of entire population was 10.6 and 27.3 months, respectively, and median duration of complete response was 14.8 months. The dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression (leucopenia grade 3/4 in 52.5% of patients). Grade 3/4 nonhaematologic toxicities included mucositis/diarrhoea in 13.1%, skin in 3.3% and cardiac in 1.6% of patients. Grade 2/3 neurotoxicity was observed in five patients (7.2%). The VNB, PTX and 5-FU continuous infusion combination regimen was active and manageable. Complete responses were frequent and durable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Paclitaxel is now included in second- and even first-line regimens in advanced breast cancer. The optimal dose and schedule of this drug, however, still remain a matter of investigation. A group of 57 consecutive patients with advanced breast cancer previously treated with anthracycline-containing regimens were submitted to treatment with single-agent paclitaxel administered at 130 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 every 21 days. Of the 57 patients, 56 were fully evaluable, and of these 25 had an absolute anthracycline resistance, 14 a relative resistance and 17 were potentially sensitive. The median age of the patients was 57 years (range 33–71 years), their median performance status was 1 (0–3), and 27 (47%) had liver involvement, 17 (30%) lung involvement, 30 (53%) bone involvement and 15 (26%) skin/lymph node involvement. Toxicity was recorded in 295 cycles. This scheme was well tolerated, the dose-limiting toxicities being hematological and neurological. Grade 3/4 leukopenia was observed in 20% of patients at nadir, while grade 3 leukopenia was observed in 3% of patients at recycle. Only one patient experienced febrile neutropenia. Grade 2/3 neurotoxicity was observed in 26% of patients, leading to drug withdrawal in three. The treatment was given on an outpatient basis in all patients and the median relative dose intensity of 86.6 mg/m2 per week was 100% of the planned dose (range 75–100%). Three patients (5%) attained a complete clinical response and 12 (21%) a partial response for an overall response rate of 26% (95% confidence interval 18–38%), while 30 (53%) attained disease stabilization and 11 progressed (19%). Time to progression in responding patients was 10.3 months, and the median overall survival of the entire population was 15.4 months. To conclude, paclitaxel administration on days 1 and 8 every 21 days was active and manageable in advanced breast cancer patients previously treated with anthracyclines. The response obtained was durable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The pharmacokinetics of a 5-day, continuous infusion of vinblastine have been reproduced by an i.v. divided bolus at 0 and 48 h [10]; this schedule can be easily applied to outpatients. We treated 26 evaluable patients with refractory, advanced breast cancer with 3.5-4 mg/m2 vinblastine given i.v. by a divided bolus at 0 and 48 h of 21-day cycles. Neurotoxicity and myelosuppression were the main side effects: severe constipation and peripheral neurotoxicity developed in 14% and 3% of the patients, respectively; severe leukopenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 24% and 10% of the patients, respectively. One partial response, 14 no changes, and 11 progressions were obtained. Our results do not support the use of vinblastine in divided doses in treating this disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]