Search

Retinoblastoma are childhood eye tumors arising from retinal precursor cells. Two distinct retinoblastoma subtypes with different clinical behavior have been described based on gene expression and methylation profiling. Using consensus clustering of DNA methylation analysis from 61 retinoblastomas, we identify a MYCN-driven cluster of subtype 2 retinoblastomas characterized by DNA hypomethylation and high expression of genes involved in protein synthesis. Subtype 2 retinoblastomas outside the MYCN-driven cluster are characterized by high expression of genes from mesodermal development, including NKX2-5. Knockdown of MYCN expression in retinoblastoma cell models causes growth arrest and reactivates a subtype 1-specific photoreceptor signature. These molecular changes suggest that removing the driving force of MYCN oncogenic activity rescues molecular circuitry driving subtype 1 biology. The MYCN-RB gene signature generated from the cell models better identifies MYCN-driven retinoblastoma than MYCN amplification and can identify cases that may benefit from MYCN-targeted therapy. MYCN drives tumor progression in a molecularly defined retinoblastoma subgroup, and inhibiting MYCN activity could restore a more differentiated and less aggressive tumor biology. DNA methylation analysis identifies a MYCN-driven subgroup of aggressive retinoblastoma that may benefit from MYCN-targeted therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Die Radiologie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

This document is a correction notice for an article titled "A MYCN-driven de-differentiation profile identifies a subgroup of aggressive retinoblastoma" published in Communications Biology. The correction addresses an error in the spelling of the author's name, Hanenberg, which was incorrectly written as Hannenberg. The original article has been corrected. The authors of the article are Tatsiana Ryl, Elena Afanasyeva, Till Hartmann, Melanie Schwermer, Markus Schneider, Christopher Schröder, Maren Wagemanns, Arthur Bister, Deniz Kanber, Laura Steenpass, Kathrin Schramm, Barbara Jones, David T. W. Jones, Eva Biewald, Kathy Astrahantseff, Helmut Hanenberg, Sven Rahmann, Dietmar R. Lohmann, Alexander Schramm, and Petra Ketteler. [Extracted from the article]

Purpose: This study aims to determine local diagnostic reference levels (LDRLs) of intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) procedures of pediatric patients with retinoblastoma (RB) to provide data for establishing diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in pediatric interventional radiology (IR). Methods: In a retrospective study design, LDRLs and achievable dose (AD) were assessed for children undergoing superselective IAC for RB treatment. All procedures were performed at the flat-panel angiography systems (I) ArtisQ biplane (Siemens Healthineers) and (II) Allura Xper (Philips Healthcare). Patients were differentiated according to age (A1: 1–3 months; A2: 4–12 months; A3: 13–72 months; A4: 73 months–10 years; A5: > 10 years), sex, conducted or not-conducted chemotherapy. Results: 248 neurointerventional procedures of 130 pediatric patients (median age 14.5 months, range 5–127 months) with RB (68 unilateral, 62 bilateral) could be included between January 2010 and March 2020. The following diagnostic reference values, AD, and mean values could be determined: (A2) DRL 3.9 Gy cm2, AD 2.9 Gy cm2, mean 3.5 Gy cm2; (A3) DRL 7.0 Gy cm2, AD 4.3 Gy cm2, mean 6.0 Gy cm2; (A4) DRL 14.5 Gy cm2, AD 10.7 Gy cm2, mean 10.8 Gy cm2; (A5) AD 8.8 Gy cm2, mean 8.8 Gy cm2. Kruskal-Wallis-test confirmed a significant dose difference between the examined age groups (A2–A5) (p < 0.001). There was no statistical difference considering sex (p = 0.076) and conducted or not-conducted chemotherapy (p = 0.627). A successful procedure was achieved in 207/248 cases. Conclusion: We report on radiation exposure during superselective IAC of a pediatric cohort at the German Retinoblastoma Referral Centre. Although an IAC formally represents a therapeutic procedure, our results confirm that radiation exposure lies within the exposure of a diagnostic interventional procedure. DRLs for superselective IAC are substantially lower compared with DRLs of more complex endovascular interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: In the last 10 years, intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) has been increasingly used in the clinical management of retinoblastoma. It is reported to provide tumor control even in advanced stage disease that might have previously required enucleation. In our clinical experience, there are three conditions that may impair the use of IAC: (1) significant collaterals to meningeal arteries, (2) technical failure of ophthalmic artery catheterization, or (3) retina blood supply from collaterals different to the ophthalmic artery. In the current study, we assessed the rate of IACs that could not be carried out in our institution due to these three reasons.Methods: All patients admitted for IAC in our hospital were retrospectively assessed by chart review. Non-application rate of IAC was assessed and classified according to the three abovementioned criteria. Complication rate of both finalized and interrupted interventions was recorded.Results: Ninety-eight patients (median age 21.4 months, range 5.3 months-10.5 years) were identified. IAC was performed in 69 (70.4%) patients and interrupted in 12 (12.2%) cases because of meningeal collaterals, in 8 (8.2%) because of technical failure to cannulate the ophthalmic artery, and in 9 (9.2%) because of alternative blood supply of the retina.Conclusion: The rather defensive approach that is pursued in our center resulted in an overall non-application rate of IAC around 30%. The relatively high probability of conditions that impair the use of IAC needs to be addressed adequately in the patient conversation prior to the procedure. Our rate of 8% of abstention from IAC due to technical limitations might be reduced by the application of more rigorous therapeutic approaches such as balloon occlusion of the distal internal carotid artery. More research is finally needed to determine if IAC can be safely performed in the presence of meningeal collaterals and via branches of the external carotid artery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]