Search

GSTD1 is an insect glutathione S-transferase that has received considerable attention because of its role in detoxification of xenobiotic compounds, specifically pesticides and plant allelochemicals involved in detoxification, or in the use of some substrates as a nutritional source. GSTD1 has been implicated in the adaptation to a new cactus host in Drosophila mojavensis and thus constitutes an interesting candidate to study ecological genetics of adaptation in Drosophila. We conducted population genetic and molecular evolution analyses of the GstD1 gene in the context of association with different cactus hosts ( Opuntia sp. vs. Columnar) in nine Drosophila species from the repleta group. We observed strong evidence of selection in GstD1 from D. hexastigma. This species is associated with a diverse set of columnar cacti with very complex chemistries. GstD1 sequences from D. hexastigma show evidence of a recent selective sweep, and positive selection at one residue just outside of the active site of the enzyme. The substitution (Q116T) at the site under selection leads to a conformational change in the enzyme that could have important consequences for substrate binding efficiency. Our results suggest that GSTD1 from D. hexastigma may have evolved improved substrate binding in order to adapt to the diverse chemical environments that this species encounters in the wild. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The cactus-yeast- Drosophila model system provides an excellent opportunity to investigate the significance of ecological factors in evolution. D. buzzatii and D. koepferae are sister species, with partially overlapping distribution ranges and a certain degree of habitat overlap. The main breeding and feeding resources of D. buzzatii are the decaying cladodes of prickly pears (genus Opuntia), whereas D. koepferae utilizes mainly columnar cacti of the genera Cereus and Echinopsis. These host plants differ in their chemical composition, the microflora associated to the decaying process and patterns of spatial and temporal predictability. The aim of the present work is to investigate host plant selection and utilization of two different cactus hosts . We report the results of field and laboratory studies examining behavioral traits related to egg-laying (oviposition preference and host acceptance) and several measures of performance (viability, developmental time, wing morphology and starvation resistance) in flies reared in the two main host cacti that D. buzzatii and D. koepferae exploit in the studied area: O. sulphurea and E. terschekii. The main conclusion of our study is the clear connection between the distribution of the cactophilic species, D. buzzatii and D. koepferae, and the abundance of the two main natural hosts, which is line with the remarkable influence that cactus hosts impose on larval and adult life history traits and behavioral traits. Overall, the results of field and laboratory work point to the important role of host plant shifts in the evolutionary history of these species . [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Species colonizing new areas disjunct from their original habitat may be subject to novel selection pressures, and exhibit adaptive genetic changes. However, if colonization occurs through a small number of founders, the genetic composition of the colonized population may differ from that of the original population simply due to genetic drift. Disentangling the effects of founder drift and selection after colonization is crucial to understanding the adaptive process. Drosophila buzzatii colonized Australia some 600–700 generations ago, and spread rapidly over a wide geographical range. Genetic variation for 15 microsatellite loci in each of nine populations in eastern Australia was used to estimate the size of the bottleneck, and to determine if any of these microsatellites marked genomic regions subject to recent selection. We estimate that on its introduction to Australia, D. buzzatii went through a moderate bottleneck (approximately 30–40 founders). Linkage disequilibrium was common, both intrachromosomal and between loci on different chromosomes. Of the 15 loci, 2 showed evidence of selection, one exhibiting local adaptation in different populations and the other balancing selection. We conclude that linkage disequilibria may be far more common in natural populations than is generally assumed, and the loci apparently affected by selection may well be marking selection in large genome regions including many loci that are not necessarily closely linked.Heredity (2009) 102, 389–401; doi:10.1038/hdy.2008.127; published online 14 January 2009 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Several studies have suggested that esterase-2 (EST-2) may be the target of natural selection in the cactophilic fly Drosophila buzzatii. In this work, we analyzed nucleotide variation in a fragment of α -esterase5 (α E5), the gene encoding EST-2, in original (Argentinian) and colonized (Australian) populations of D. buzzatii and in its sibling D. koepferae. Estimates of nucleotide heterozygosity in D. buzzatii were similar in Australia and Argentina, although we detected a loss of singletons in colonized populations, suggesting a moderate founder effect. Interspecific comparisons revealed that D. buzzatii was more polymorphic for nonsynonymous variation, whereas D. koepferae was more variable for synonymous and noncoding sites. The two major chromosomal arrangements ( 2st and 2j) in D. buzzatii displayed similar levels of nucleotide variation, whereas 2jz 3 was monomorphic. The sequenced region allowed the discrimination of a greater number of EST-2 protein variants in the Australian sample than in the Argentinean sample. In D. koepferae, nucleotide variation in α E5 does not depart from neutral expectations, although tests of population structure were significant for silent variation. In contrast, D. buzzatii has probably undergone a recent population expansion in its South American range. In addition, the McDonald and Kreitman test revealed an excess of nonsynonymous polymorphism in both original and colonized populations of this species. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Drosophila buzzatii and Drosophila koepferae are two cactophilic sibling species whose ranges partially overlap in Northwestern and Western Argentina. Both species can utilize the decaying tissues of both Opuntia and columnar cacti as breeding sites. Though D. buzzatii and D. koepferae are not differentially attracted to Opuntia and columnar hosts, the composition of the communities of flies emerging from natural substrates of both cacti differed significantly in a natural population. The objective of this paper is to analyze whether intra and/or interspecific competition affects development time and thorax length in D. buzzatii and D. koepferae when both species are reared in single and mixed species culture and fed with semi-natural media prepared with fermenting materials of Opuntia sulphurea (tuna) and Trichocereus terschekii (cardón). Our results showed that both traits differ significantly between flies raised in different hosts and that differences between D. koepferae and D. buzzatii species for both thorax length and development time depend on the type of culture (mixed vs. single species). In addition, the host by type of culture interaction was significant. We also observed thorax length differences between Drosophila species and type of culture. Our present data suggest that the effect of intra and interspecific competition varied between the two traits investigated and between species. However, competition alone cannot explain the differential pattern of resource utilization shown by D. buzzatii and D. koepferae in the natural population studied. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Drosophila antonietae is an endemic South American cactophilic species that uses Cereus hildmaniannus rotting cladodes as breeding sites. We assessed temporal and spatial intrapopulational allozyme variation of two natural populations. Our results suggest that environmental variation (rain precipitation) is probably influencing allozyme temporal variation. Moreover, it seems that D. antonietae does not have intrapopulation structure and has N[subev] (variance effective size) &simE; 83 and N[subec] (number of adult flies that colonize each rotting cladode) = 21. The deficiency of heterozygotes found must be due to null alleles, a temporal Wahlund effect, or selection against heterozygotes. Assortative mating and inbreeding are discarded. This is the first report on allozyme variation in D. antonietae. It gives some insight on intrapopulational genetics through space and time for this species. This is important to understand its general genetic variability and will be essential to future works on the natural history and evolution of this species. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The D. seridosuperspecies is a complex mosaic of populations distributed over a vast part of South America and showing various degrees of genetical divergence. We have analyzed its chromosomal constitution in 16 new localities of southeastern and southern Brazil. Both the metaphase and salivary gland chromosomes show a sharp split of these populations in two groups. Four populations, fixed for inversion 2e 8and showing the type I karyotype, represent the southwestern limit of D. seridotype B, which inhabits the Cerrado in central-western Brazil. The remaining populations are homozygous for 2x 7, an inversion also fixed in the Caatinga populations of northeastern Brazil. However, their karyotype, in those populations analyzed, belong to a different type (V) from that of the Caatinga populations. Populations in this second group are polymorphic for five inversions on chromosome 2 plus another on chromosome 5 and show considerable interpopulation differentiation. The breakpoints of chromosome 2 inversions are described and the inversion loops of several heterokaryotypes are presented. Biogeographical information suggests that there are clear ecological differences between the two groups of populations as well as among the populations within the second group. The possible role of host plants in promoting the genetic divergence among the D. seridopopulations is discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]