Search

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is frequently seen in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients and presents a significant clinical challenge. The association of VTE during intensive chemotherapy with risk models such as the Medical Research Council (MRC) cytogenetic-based assessment and the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2017 molecular risk model have not been rigorously evaluated. Additionally, there is a paucity of data pertaining to the long-term prognostic impact of VTE in AML patients. We performed an analysis of baseline parameters of AML patients diagnosed with VTE during intensive chemotherapy and compared them with patients without VTE. The analyzed cohort consisted of 335 newly diagnosed AML patients with a median age of 55 years. Thirty-five patients (11%) were classified as MRC favorable risk, 219 (66%) patients as intermediate risk, 58 patients (17%) as adverse risk. Per ELN 2017, 132 patients (40%) had favorable risk disease, 122 patients (36%) intermediate risk, and 80 patients (24%) had adverse risk. VTE was seen in 33 patients (9.9%), occurring mostly during induction (70%), and required catheter removal in 9 patients (28%). Baseline clinical, laboratory, molecular, and ELN 2017 parameters were not significantly different groups. However, MRC intermediate-risk group patients were significantly more likely to experience thrombosis compared to favorable risk and adverse risk patients (12.8% versus 5.7% and 1.7%, respectively; p = 0.049). Median overall survival was not significantly impacted by the diagnosis of thrombosis (3.7 years versus 2.2 years; p = 0.47). VTE is tightly associated with temporal and cytogenetic parameters in AML but does not significantly impact on long-term outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with FLT3-mutated relapsed or refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have a dismal prognosis. Gilteritinib is a FLT3 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) recently approved for patients with R/R AML. We aimed to characterize real-world data regarding gilteritinib treatment in FLT3-mutated R/R AML and to compare outcomes with matched FLT3-mutated R/R AML patients treated with chemotherapy-based salvage regimens. Twenty-five patients from six academic centers were treated with gilteritinib for FLT3-mutated R/R AML. Eighty percent were treated with a prior intensive induction regimen and 40% of them received prior TKI therapy. Twelve patients (48%) achieved complete response (CR) with gilteritinib. The estimated median overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort was eight (CI 95% 0–16.2) months and was significantly higher in patients who achieved CR compared to those who did not (16.3 months, CI 95% 0–36.2 vs. 2.6 months, CI 95% 1.47–3.7; p value = 0.046). In a multivariate cox regression analysis, achievement of CR was the only predictor for longer OS (HR 0.33 95% CI 0.11–0.97, p = 0.044). Prior TKI exposure did not affect OS but was associated with better event-free survival (HR 0.15 95% CI 0.03–0.71, p = 0.016). An age and ELN-risk matched comparison between patients treated with gilteritinib and intensive salvage revealed similar response rates (50% in both groups); median OS was 9.6 months (CI 95% 2.3–16.8) vs. 7 months (CI 95% 5.1–8.9) in gilteritinib and matched controls, respectively (p = 0.869). In conclusion, in the real-world setting, gilteritinib is effective, including in heavily pre-treated, TKI exposed patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The clinical yield and benefit of performing bone marrow cultures for various clinical indications has been challenged and their clinical necessity remains debatable. We sought to assess the clinical yield and benefit of performing routine bone marrow cultures and determine whether various clinical, laboratory, and imaging parameters were predictive of a diagnostic bone marrow culture. This was a single center retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent a bone marrow study comprising bone marrow cultures from January 1, 2012, through March 1, 2018. Baseline clinical data were extracted from the institution's electronic medical records system. The analyzed cohort consisted of 139 patients with a median age of 46 years (range 4 months to 85 years). The most common indication for a bone marrow study was workup of a fever of unknown origin (105 patients, 76%) while investigation for infection in immunocompromised patients accounted for 22 cases (16%) and suspected tuberculosis was the reason for acquisition of bone marrow cultures in 6 patients (4%). Only 3 patients had positive bone marrow cultures, yielding in 2 patients a diagnosis of Mycobacterium avium and in one patient a microbiologically unclassifiable fungal infection. A univariate analysis revealed that mean age, hemoglobin level, platelet count, c-reactive protein levels, gender, indication for bone marrow study, yield of blood cultures, and contribution of imaging studies and bone marrow pathology results were not significantly different between patients with diagnostic and non-diagnostic bone marrow cultures. Mean white blood cell count was found to be significantly lower in patients with diagnostic bone marrow cultures (2.4 × 103/µL versus 8.7 × 103/µL; P = 0.038). We conclude that for most patients, performance of bone marrow cultures holds limited clinical value. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chemotherapy-based approaches still constitute an essential feature in the treatment paradigm of adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). The German Multicenter Study Group (GMALL) is a well-established protocol for ALL. In this study, we assessed our recent experience with the GMALL 07/2003 protocol reviewing all adult ALL patients who were treated with GMALL in three major centers in Israel during 2007–2020. The analysis comprised 127 patients with a median age of 41 years (range 17–83). Sixty-two were B-ALL (49%), 20 (16%) patients were Philadelphia chromosome positive ALL, and 45 (35%) were T-ALL. The 2-year and 5-year overall survival rates were 71% and 57%, respectively. The 2-year relapse rate was 30% with 2-year and 5-year leukemia-free survival rates of 59% and 50%, respectively. Adolescents and young adults experienced significantly longer overall survival (84 months versus 51 months; p=0.047) as well as leukemia-free survival compared with older patients (66 months versus 54 months, p=0.003; hazard ratio=0.39, 95% confidence interval, 0.19–0.79; p=0.009). T-ALL patients had longer survival compared to B-ALL patients while survival was comparable among Philadelphia chromosome positive patients and Philadelphia chromosome negative patients. An increased number of cytogenetic clones at diagnosis were tightly associated with adverse prognosis (15-month survival for ≥2 clones versus 81 months for normal karyotype; p=0.003). Positive measurable residual disease studies following consolidation were predictive for increased risk of relapse (64% versus 22%; p=0.003) and shorter leukemia-free survival (11 months versus 42 months; p=0.0003). While GMALL is an effective adult regimen, a substantial patient segment still experiences relapse. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Early mortality remains a challenging therapeutic facet of the initial induction phase of intensive chemotherapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The impact of standard molecular evaluation and risk category of the European LeukemiaNet (ELN) 2017 classification model on early mortality has not been rigorously evaluated thus far. We reviewed the medical records of 320 consecutive adult patients with newly diagnosed AML treated with intensive induction chemotherapy in our center from 2007 to 2021. The median age was 56 years; 33 patients (10%) died during induction. Patient age, white blood cell count, hemoglobin level, platelet level, creatinine, uric acid, lactate dehydrogenase serum levels, and FLT3-ITD and CEBPA mutational status did not significantly impact early mortality. NPM1mut patients had a lower likelihood of early death compared to NPM1wt (5% versus 13%; p = 0.023) whereas patients with high-risk cytogenetic studies experienced higher rates of induction mortality compared with intermediate and favorable risk patients (20% versus 8 and 7%, respectively; p = 0.049). Adverse risk ELN 2017 was significantly more likely to die during induction compared with intermediate and favorable risk patients (20% versus 10 and 4%, respectively; p = 0.001). Patients treated in 2007–2011 experienced a significantly higher rate of induction death compared with patients in 2012–2021 (17% versus 8%; p = 0.039). Multivariate analysis confirmed adverse ELN 2017 [odds ratio (OR), 6.7; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.74–25.3; p = 0.006) and treatment timeframe (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.14–0.85; p = 0.019) as pivotal predictors of early mortality. ELN 2017 is a robust prognosticator of early mortality in intensively treated AML patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Correction to: Gilteritinib monotherapy for relapsed/refractory FLT3 mutated acute myeloid leukemia: a real-world, multi-center, matched analysis Publisher's note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. The original article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-022-04895-8. [Extracted from the article]