Search

In recent years, the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) has grown rapidly, a fact that has led to an increase in the number of cyberattacks that target this environment and the technologies that it brings together. Unfortunately, when it comes to using tools for stopping such attacks, it can be noticed that there are inherent weaknesses in this paradigm, such as limitations in computational capacity, memory and network bandwidth. Under these circumstances, the solutions used until now in conventional scenarios cannot be directly adopted by the IIoT, and so it is necessary to develop and design new ones that can effectively tackle this problem. Furthermore, these new solutions must be tested in order to verify their performance and viability, which requires testing architectures that are compatible with newly introduced IIoT topologies. With the aim of addressing these issues, this work proposes MECInOT, which is an architecture based on openLEON and capable of generating test scenarios for the IIoT environment. The performance of this architecture is validated by creating an intelligent threat detector based on tree-based algorithms, such as decision tree, random forest and other machine learning techniques. Which allows us to generate an intelligent and to demonstrate, we could generate an intelligent threat detector and demonstrate the suitability of our architecture for testing solutions in IIoT environments. In addition, by using MECInOT, we compare the performance of the different machine learning algorithms in an IIoT network. Firstly, we present the benefits of our proposal, and secondly, we describe the emulation of an IIoT environment while ensuring the repeatability of the experiments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The weakness of the security measures implemented on Internet of Things (IoT) devices, added to the sensitivity of the data that they handle, has created an attractive environment for cybercriminals to carry out attacks. This has caused a substantial increase in the number of cyberincidents, requiring the opening of digital investigations in order to shed light on what has occurred. However, the characteristics of this new environment, such as its variety of contexts, make it impossible to use the methodology followed until now in conventional analysis. Therefore, a new common procedure is needed to ensure that IoT examinations are carried out in a complete and efficient manner. In this article, after reviewing the methodological requirements of IoT forensics, and studying the suggestions made by the research community, a methodology to perform investigations in a certain context of the IoT environment is proposed. In addition, its practicality is evaluated in three different security incident scenarios, proving its effectiveness and appropriateness to be used in future cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The industrial internet of things (IIoT) has undergone rapid growth in recent years, which has resulted in an increase in the number of threats targeting both IIoT devices and their connecting technologies. However, deploying tools to counter these threats involves tackling inherent limitations, such as limited processing power, memory, and network bandwidth. As a result, traditional solutions, such as the ones used for desktop computers or servers, cannot be applied directly in the IIoT, and the development of new technologies is essential to overcome this issue. One approach that has shown potential for this new paradigm is the implementation of intrusion detection system (IDS) that rely on machine learning (ML) techniques. These IDSs can be deployed in the industrial control system or even at the edge layer of the IIoT topology. However, one of their drawbacks is that, depending on the factory’s specifications, it can be quite challenging to locate sufficient traffic data to train these models. In order to address this problem, this study introduces a novel IDS based on the TabPFN model, which can operate on small datasets of IIoT traffic and protocols, as not in general much traffic is generated in this environment. To assess its efficacy, it is compared against other ML algorithms, such as random forest, XGBoost, and LightGBM, by evaluating each method with different training set sizes and varying numbers of classes to classify. Overall, TabPFN produced the most promising outcomes, with a 10–20% differentiation in each metric. The best performance was observed when working with 1000 training set samples, obtaining an F1 score of 81% for 6-class classification and 72% for 10-class classification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]