Search

Despite an attractive interest rate differential between China and foreign countries, existing capital control might prevent currency carry trade strategies to be executed. We focus on the copper market to study if trades are taken in order to execute carry trade strategies. We find that copper value is related to carry trade through the onshore-offshore interest differential, while the pegged nature of the USD/CNY exchange rate makes traders indifferent to the forward risk premium. We rule out the possibility of high average payoff due to peso problems, because risk factors are insignificant, implying that carry traders are either fully hedged on FX risks, or they are unconcerned about FX risks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We propose a heterogeneous agent model including the fundamentalists, chartists, and carry traders, to describe the dynamics of exchange rates, and examine the effects of Tobin Tax on the equilibrium exchange rates. A theoretical analysis shows that an increase of Tobin tax always reduces the trading volume, and its impact on the equilibrium exchange rate depends on the agents' expectations of exchange rate movements and their weights in the markets. Our simulation exercise shows that an increase in Tobin tax may lead to an increase in volatility and price distortion and a decrease in the kurtosis and the trading volume. Our results suggest that the Tobin tax could be an emergency measure, but not a long-term policy tool to suppress speculation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper studies optimal currency allocation of the carry trade in foreign exchange (FX). A number of empirical studies have documented a phenomenon referred to as the 'forward premium puzzle', which states that the carry trade is profitable on average. However, the carry reversal during the 2008 global crisis periods wiped out the profits earned by the trade. To account for the regime shifts in the joint distribution of returns on the carry trade with FX market portfolios, we adopt a Markov regime switching model. We find evidence of two economic regimes: one state captures periods of the forward premium puzzle and UIP being violated, whilst the other reports high FX volatility and negative return of carry trade portfolio. Furthermore, to quantify the economic significance of regimes in returns on currency portfolios, we consider their importance in investors' optimal portfolio allocation problem. We find strong evidence that optimal currency portfolio holdings vary significantly across regimes and across short and long investment horizons, as investors anticipate a shift out of the current state. Our results also show that the regimes partially anticipate peso events as well as the changes of funding liquidity measured by the TED spreads. A strategy that accounts for regimes, thus, generates overall stronger performance than the single-state Gaussian IID model, a carry trade procedure as well as a buy-and-hold strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper investigates the asymmetric effects of exchange rate volatility in currency markets using high-frequency, intraday data of the most actively traded currencies over 2004–2017. The analysis is conducted by combining the quantile regression model with the heterogeneous autoregressive (HAR) model and its extensions where realized variance is decomposed into positive and negative semivariances. We find that safe haven currencies exhibit behavior different from that of other currencies. For safe haven currencies, negative realized semivariance associated with appreciation plays an important role in explaining the quantile-dependent volatility dynamics. This behavior is more pronounced during high volatility phases. The opposite holds for other currencies, i.e., positive realized semivariance associated with depreciation matters more. The results also reveal that while negative jumps associated with the appreciation of safe haven currencies lead to higher future volatility, positive jumps associated with the depreciation of other currencies lead to higher future volatility, especially during high volatility phases. We formally test whether the volatility dynamics are quantile dependent. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The returns to carry trades are controversially discussed. There seems to be no unifying risk-based explanation of currency returns and stock returns, while the countries' interest rate differential plays a leading part in the carry-trade performance. Therefore, this paper addresses carry-trade returns from a risk-pricing perspective and examines if these returns can be connected to cross-country differences in risk pricing in the interest-rate market compared to the stock market. Data from Thomson Reuters Datastream and Federal Reserve Economic Data covering Australia, Japan, New Zealand, Switzerland and the United States were analyzed based on GMM estimation. The results indicate significant and persistent cross-country differences in risk aversion in the interest-rate market compared to the implied risk aversion in the stock market. This may offer opportunities for risk arbitrage and, therefore, a risk pricing-related explanation of carry-trade returns. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

It is commonly agreed that excessive household financial debts are detrimental to psychological and physical health. Research also demonstrates that housing instability, mortgage indebtedness and mortgage foreclosure negatively influence subjective well-being. In Poland at the beginning of 2015, homeowners with Swiss franc denominated mortgages suffered from an abrupt swing in the Swiss franc/Polish zloty (CHF/PLN) exchange rate, which resulted in considerable increase in the local currency value of their mortgages. These adverse financial circumstances were hypothesised to affect not only household finance but also negatively affect the psychological well-being and physical health of peoples. The 2013 and 2015 waves of the Polish representative household panel 'Social Diagnosis' were used to examine impact of the abrupt change in the CHF/PLN exchange rate in Jan. 2015 on well-being and health. Causal inference was investigated using a difference-in-differences matching estimator. Results showed that although impact of Swiss franc appreciation on the mortgage related financial burden was considerable, it did not affect well-being or health outcomes. Any manifestation of adverse effects was absent in the short term, which does not however preclude their long term existence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]