Search

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is a large, multidomain protein kinase, which plays a central role in the regulation of cell growth and has recently emerged as an essential target of survival signals in many types of human cancer cells. Here, we report the solution structures of complexes formed between the FKBP12-rapamycin binding (FRB) domain of mTOR and phosphatidic acid, an important cellular activator of the kinase, and between the FRB domain and a novel inhibitor (HTS-1). The overall structure of the FRB domain is very similar to that seen in the ternary complex formed with FKBP12 and the immunosuppressive drug rapamycin; however, there are significant changes within the rapamycin-binding site with important consequences for rational drug design. The surface of the FRB domain contains a number of distinctive features that have previously escaped attention, including a potential new regulatory site on the opposite face to that involved in the binding of rapamycin, which displays the features expected for a specific binding site for a small molecule. The interaction sites for phosphatidic acid and HTS-1 were found to closely match the site responsible for rapamycin binding. In addition, the structures determined for the FRB–phosphatidic acid and FRB–HTS-1 complexes revealed a striking similarity between the conformations of buried portions of the ligands and that seen for the rapamycin backbone in contact with the domain. Our findings further highlight the importance of the FRB domain in small molecule-mediated regulation of mTOR, demonstrate the ability to identify novel inhibitors of mTOR that bind tightly to the rapamycin-binding site in the absence of FKBP12, and identify a potential new regulatory site that may be exploited in the design of new anticancer drugs.Oncogene (2008) 27, 585–595; doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1210693; published online 6 August 2007 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We present the in vitro characterization of a novel phosphodiesterase type 4 inhibitor, CDP840 ( R-[+]-4-[2-{3-cyclopentyloxy-4-methoxyphenyl}-2-phenylethyl]pyridine), which has shown efficacy in a phase II allergen challenge study in asthmatics without adverse effects. CDP840 potently inhibits PDE-4 isoenzymes (IC50 2–30 n M) without any effect on PDE-1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 (IC50>100 μ M). It exhibited no significant selectivity in inhibiting human recombinant isoenzymes PDE-4A, B, C or D and was equally active against the isoenzymes lacking UCR1 (PDE-4B2 and PDE-4D2). In contrast to rolipram, CDP840 acted as a simple competitive inhibitor of all PDE-4 isoenzymes. Studies with rolipram indicated a heterogeneity within all the preparations of PDE-4 isoenzymes, indicative of rolipram inhibiting the catalytic activity of PDE-4 with both a low or high affinity. These observations were confirmed by the use of a PDE-4A variant, PDE-4A330–886, which rolipram inhibited with low affinity (IC50=1022 n M). CDP840 in contrast inhibited this PDE-4A variant with similar potency (IC50=3.9 n M), which was in good agreement with the K d of 4.8 n M obtained from [3H]-CDP840 binding studies. Both CDP840 and rolipram inhibited the high-affinity binding of [3H]-rolipram binding to PDE-4A, B, C and D with similar K d app (7–19 n M and 3–5 n M, respectively). Thus, the activity of CDP840 at the [3H]-rolipram binding site was in agreement with the inhibitor’s activity at the catalytic site. However, rolipram was ∼100-fold more potent than CDP840 at inhibiting the binding of [3H]-rolipram to mouse brain in vivo. These data clearly demonstrate that CDP840 is a potent selective inhibitor of all PDE-4 isoenzymes. In contrast to rolipram, CDP840 was well-tolerated in humans. This difference, however, cannot at present be attributed to either isoenzyme selectivity or lack of activity in vitro at the high-affinity rolipram binding site (Sr). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]