Search

Purpose: Insights into the severity of co-existing symptoms can help in identifying breast cancer survivors in need of symptom management. We aimed to identify subgroups of breast cancer survivors based on patterns of symptom severity, and characteristics associated with these subgroups.Methods: We selected surgically treated stage I-III breast cancer survivors 1-5 years post-diagnosis from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (N = 876). We assessed experienced severity of fatigue, nausea, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite, constipation, diarrhea, and emotional and cognitive symptoms through the EORTC-QLQ-C30 Quality of Life Questionnaire on a scale of 0-100. We determined subgroups of survivors using latent class cluster analyses (LCA) based on severity of co-existing symptoms and compared their mean severity to the age-matched female reference population to interpret clinical relevance. We assessed subgroup characteristics by multinomial logistic regression analyses.Results: From 404 respondents (46%), three subgroups of survivors with distinct symptom severity were identified: low severity (n = 116, 28.7%), intermediate severity (n = 224, 55.4%), and high severity (n = 59, 14.6%). The low subgroup reported lower symptom severity than the general population; the intermediate subgroup reported a similar symptom severity, although scores for fatigue, insomnia, and cognitive symptoms were worse (small-medium clinical relevance). The high subgroup had worse symptom severity (medium-large clinical relevance). Compared to the intermediate subgroup, one (RRR: 2.75; CI: 1.22-6.19; p = 0.015) or more (RRR: 9.19; CI: 3.70-22.8; p =  < 0.001) comorbidities were significantly associated with the high subgroup. We found no associated treatment characteristics.Conclusion: We identified distinct subgroups of breast cancer survivors based on symptom severity, underlining the relevance of further exploring personalized follow-up strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Health care needs of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer are probably different from other age groups. Studying their non-oncology physician visits in the first years after diagnosis may provide insight into the specific health problems AYA patients experience and thereby help to improve care for these patients.Methods: Seven hundred seventy-four AYAs identified from a Canadian provincial registry diagnosed with cancer between ages 15 and 24 years in 1991/2001 were included, matched by birth year and sex to ten controls. Based on provincial health insurance plan records, we determined the number of family physician and non-cancer specialist visits in the 5 years after diagnosis (for patients) or inclusion (for controls).Results: The percentage of patients visiting a non-cancer specialist decreased from 96 to 49 % over the 5-year period. The percentage visiting a family physician decreased from 96 to 84 %. Visits in all years were significantly higher than among controls. In the first year after diagnosis, many patients visited a non-cancer specialist or a family physician for neoplasm-related health problems (77 and 55 %, respectively). In addition, family physicians were also consulted for general age-specific problems, such as genitourinary symptomsConclusions: In the first years after diagnosis of cancer in AYAs, both non-cancer specialist and family physician visits are common, although non-cancer specialist visits are less common and decline considerably faster than in younger children.Implications For Cancer Survivors: The specific pattern of physician visits of this age group calls for care that is tailored to their specific needs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]