Search

Objectives: Our study sought to explore the prognostic value of radiomic TA (texture analysis) on quantitative ECV (extracellular volume) fraction mapping to differentiate between reversible and irreversible myocardial damage and to predict left ventricular adverse remodeling in patients with reperfused STEMI (ST-elevation myocardial infarction).Methods: This observational prospective cohort study identified 70 patients (62 ± 9 years, 62 men [85.70%]) with STEMI for TA who consecutively performed native and contrast T1 mapping. Texture features were extracted from each stack of ECV mapping based on ROI (region of interest) analysis.Results: After texture feature selection and dimension reduction, five selected texture features were found to be statistically significant for differentiating the extent of myocardial injury. ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curve analysis for the differentiation of unsalvageable infarction and salvageable myocardium demonstrated a significantly higher AUC (area under the curve) (0.91 [95% CI, 0.86-0.96], p < 0.0001) for horizontal fraction than other texture features (p < 0.05). LVAR (left ventricular adverse remodeling) was predicted by those selected features. The differences in qualitative and quantitative baseline parameters and horizontal fractions were significant between the patients with and without LVAR. LGE (late gadolinium enhancement) and horizontal fraction features of infarcted myocardium in acute STEMI were the only two parameters selected in forming the optimal overall multivariable model for LVAR at 6 months.Conclusions: Radiomic analysis of ECV could discriminate reversible from irreversible myocardial injury after STEMI. LGE as well as radiomics TA (texture analysis) of ECV may provide an alternative to predict LVAR and functional recovery.Key Points: • ECV quantification was able to differentiate between infarcted myocardium and non-infarcted myocardium. • Radiomics analysis of ECV could discriminate reversible from irreversible myocardial injury. • Radiomics TA analysis shows a promising similarity with LGE findings which could aid the prognosis of myocardial infarction patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The importance of breast cancer screening has long been known. Unfortunately, there is no imaging modality for screening women with dense breasts that is both sensitive and without concerns regarding potential side effects. The purpose of this study is to explore the possibility of combined diffusion-weighted imaging and turbo inversion recovery magnitude MRI (DWI + TIRM) to overcome the difficulty of detection sensitivity and safety. Methods: One hundred and seventy-six breast lesions from 166 women with dense breasts were retrospectively evaluated. The lesion visibility, area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity of cancer detection by MG, DWI + TIRM, and clinical MRI were evaluated and compared. MG plus clinical MRI served as the gold standard for lesion detection and pathology served as the gold standard for cancer detection. Results: Lesion visibility of DWI + TIRM (96.6%) was significantly superior to MG (67.6%) in women with dense breasts (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference compared with clinical MRI. DWI + TIRM showed higher accuracy (AUC = 0.935) and sensitivity (93.68%) for breast cancer detection than MG (AUC = 0.783, sensitivity = 46.32%), but was comparable to clinical MRI (AUC = 0.944, sensitivity = 93.68%). The specificity of DWI + TIRM (83.95%) was lower than MG (98.77%), but higher than clinical MRI (77.78%). Conclusions: DWI combined with TIRM could be a safe, sensitive, and practical alternative for screening women with dense breasts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In Kuwait, the age-standardized incidence rate (per 100,000) for oral cancer is 1.5 and the mortality rate is 0.4. Early detection of oral cancer combined with appropriate treatment greatly improves the chances of cure and the quality of life. However, little is known about patient awareness of this disease and the ability to identify early signs, particularly among high-risk groups. Hence, the aim of this study is to assess dental patients' awareness and knowledge of mouth cancer and beliefs and perceptions about risk factors. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect information from a convenience sample of outpatients attending the dental admission clinic. The questionnaire included questions to ascertain information on socio-demographic characteristics, knowledge of risk factors, and signs of oral cancer as well as sources of information regarding the same. Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences for Windows 19.0. A total of 160 questionnaires were distributed out of which 136 completed questionnaires were returned and used for the study. The mean knowledge score for oral cancer risk factors was found to be 5.2 ± 2.7 out of ten while that of signs and symptoms was 3.4 ± 2.7 out of eight. When the knowledge of risk factors of oral cancer was taken into consideration along with variables, significant difference was seen only in sex with women having better knowledge (p = 0.03). Knowledge about signs and symptoms of oral cancer revealed a highly significant difference with the level of education (p = 0.03). Family, friends, and colleagues were mentioned as the main source of information regarding oral cancer. Our findings suggest that knowledge regarding oral cancer risk factors, signs, and symptoms was found to be lacking among the dental patients which emphasizes the need for patient education at the dental centers as well as public awareness programs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The study aimed at determining the association between oral disease and systemic health based on panoramic radiographs and general health of patients treated at Kuwait University Dental Center. The objective was to determine whether individuals exhibiting good oral health have lower propensity to systemic diseases. Materials and methods: A total of 1000 adult patients treated at Kuwait University Dental Center were randomly selected from the patient's records. The general health of patients was assessed from the medical history of each patient recorded during their visit to the clinic. The number of reported diseases and serious symptoms were used to develop a medical index. The oral health of these patients was assessed from panoramic radiographs to create an oral index by evaluating such parameters as caries, periodontitis, periapical lesions, pericoronitis, and tooth loss. Results: In a total of 887 patients, 43.8 % had an oral index between 3 and 8, of which significantly higher (62.1 %) patients were with medical conditions compared to those without (33.2 %; p < 0.001). The Spearmans's correlation (rho') revealed a positive correlation (rho' = 0.360, p 0.001) between oral and medical index. Partial correlation, while controlling demographics, gender, nationality, and age, also showed a significant positive correlation ( p < 0.001) between medical and oral index. Conclusions: The findings of this study showed a significant association between oral health and general health and confirmed the findings of previous reports as regards the existing correlation between dental infections and medical disorders. These results are not indicative of a causal relationship when the diagnosis of oral disease was based primarily on radiographic findings. Future research needs to include prospective clinical and interventional studies. Clinical relevance: The significance of the oral-systemic disease connection highlights the importance of preventing and treating oral disease which have profound medical implications on general health. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lack of general dental practitioner oral cancer knowledge has been shown to be a major factor to delays in referral and treatment. Dentists' competence and confidence in detecting oral cancer may be strongly influenced by their dental school training. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess dental student's awareness and knowledge of prevention and early detection of oral cancer. Through the use of questionnaires, the students' knowledge of oral cancer risk factors, diagnostic concepts, and clinical care of patients was assessed. An excellent response rate (97.3 %) was observed in this study. Overall, the students' knowledge of diagnostic items was significantly higher ( p ≤ 0.001) than their knowledge of risk factors. A high percentage of students identified tobacco (98.6 %) and alcohol (76.7 %) as the principal risk factors and would offer advice regarding modification of these habits (75.3 %). Also, their knowledge of non-risk factors was significantly lower than their knowledge of proven risk factors ( p ≤ 0.001). Only one fifth of the students regarded visual inspection to be an effective screening method. Only 32.9 % stated that all suspicious lesions should be biopsied, and as low as 2.7 % had assisted in taking a biopsy. This study highlights the need for a more structured teaching program with greater emphasis on the early signs and risk factors of oral cancer, performing routine oral examination, referral for biopsy, and appropriate early management of suspicious oral lesions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In the original version of the article, the image of Figure 2 was erroneously duplicated as Figure 4. The correct version of Figure 4 is given below. The original article has been corrected. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]