Search

Individuals with obesity are at increased risk of developing infectious diseases. Timely administration of an effective dose of an antimicrobial agent is paramount to safeguard optimal therapy. For this purpose, special patient populations at risk for altered exposure such as renal or hepatic impairment are studied during drug development. Strikingly, there is no such evaluation in individuals with obesity despite a potential influence on exposure and a global obesity prevalence of 13 %. Optimal clinical decision making in patients with obesity is impossible without prior study of the drug of interest in this population. This statement is strengthened by an evaluation of 19 antimicrobial agents that showed tremendous variability in the influence of weight on clearance. In contrast to patient with renal or hepatic impairment who are mainly at risk of overexposure, individuals with obesity can be at risk of both under- and overexposure. Gaining knowledge on the influence of body weight on clearance during early phases of drug development may allow for optimisation of other phases of research, potentially increasing success rate of the drug, and can provide clinicians with vital information as soon as the drug reaches the market. Antimicrobial therapy should be tailored to obesity-related (patho)physiological changes and to reach this goal, obese individuals should be studied during drug development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Anti-Xa peak level monitoring is recommended during LMWH treatment in renal impairment or obesity. The trough level has been proposed as marker for bleeding. We studied the influence of renal impairment and obesity on anti-Xa levels. Methods: Peak and trough levels were collected during therapeutic nadroparin treatment in patients with renal impairment, obese patients, and controls. 27 patients (n = 68 samples) were evaluated and combined with published data (n = 319 samples from 35 patients) using population pharmacokinetic (popPK) modelling. Results: Median peak level was 0.44 and 0.95 IU/mL in renal impairment with and without dose reduction and 0.60 and 0.43 IU/mL in obesity and controls, respectively. Trough levels were < 0.5 IU/mL in all patients with renal impairment with dose reduction and in 5/6 control patients. In the popPK model, total body weight and eGFR were covariates for clearance and lean body weight for distribution volume. Model-based evaluations demonstrated peak levels below the therapeutic window in controls and increased levels in renal impairment. Dose reductions resulted in a different effect on peak and trough levels. Obese patients (BMI up to 32 kg/m2) had similar levels upon weight-based dosing. Conclusion: In renal impairment, anti-Xa peak levels after dose reduction are comparable to those in controls. Weight-based dosing is suitable for obese patients. Aiming for peak levels between 0.6 and 1.0 IU/mL in these patients would result in overexposure compared to controls. Considering the association of trough levels and bleeding risk and our findings, trough monitoring seems to be a suitable parameter to identify nadroparin accumulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Obesity and its related complications are increasing health issues. Since generally only minor weight loss is obtained with lifestyle intervention, additional pharmacological therapies such as metformin are often used.Objective: We conducted a systematic review to provide an overview of the efficacy of ≥ 6 months of metformin treatment in children and adults with respect to weight, insulin resistance, and progression toward type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).Methods: In September 2018, we searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies published in English using the keywords metformin, obesity/overweight, and weight loss. Prospective studies reporting weight/body mass index (BMI) as a primary or secondary outcome in patients with overweight/obesity with ≥ 6 months' metformin treatment were included. Included subjects were children and adults with overweight/obesity who received ≥ 6 months of metformin and/or lifestyle intervention, and/or placebo and/or lifestyle intervention, and/or standard care. Studies were independently screened by two reviewers. Data were extracted by one and verified by the other reviewer, and both reviewers assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool.Results: Our review includes 15 pediatric and 14 adult studies. In children, after 6 months, more than half the studies reported a greater reduction in BMI with metformin versus controls. Only six studies had an intervention of > 6 months, and these studies found no further improvement in BMI in the metformin users, though their BMI was lower than that of controls. Three studies showed a significant improvement in insulin sensitivity in the metformin versus the control group. Adults using metformin experienced and maintained small decreases in weight irrespective of duration of intervention. In 11 of 14 studies, a greater reduction in weight/BMI was observed with metformin than with placebo. Progression toward T2DM was significantly reduced in adults using metformin, ranging from 7 to 31%. The safety and tolerability of metformin, withdrawal of participants, and comparison with other drugs were not taken into account.Conclusions: The effects of metformin on weight/BMI vary, with smaller reductions in children than in adults. This could be because of differences in adherence, daily dosage, and insulin status. Metformin significantly reduced the progression toward T2DM in adults. Therefore, metformin should be considered as a treatment for obesity and its related complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims/hypothesis: This study aimed to systematically review what has been reported on the incidence and prevalence of type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents, to scrutinise the methodological issues observed in the included studies and to prepare recommendations for future research and surveillances. Methods: PubMed, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, EMBASE and Web of Science were searched from inception to February 2013. Population-based studies on incidence and prevalence of type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents were summarised and methodologically evaluated. Owing to substantial methodological heterogeneity and considerable differences in study populations a quantitative meta-analysis was not performed. Results: Among 145 potentially relevant studies, 37 population-based studies met the inclusion criteria. Variations in the incidence and prevalence rates of type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents were mainly related to age of the study population, calendar time, geographical regions and ethnicity, resulting in a range of 0-330 per 100,000 person-years for incidence rates, and 0-5,300 per 100,000 population for prevalence rates. Furthermore, a substantial variation in the methodological characteristics was observed for response rates (60-96%), ascertainment rates (53-99%), diagnostic tests and criteria used to diagnose type 2 diabetes. Conclusions/interpretation: Worldwide incidence and prevalence of type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents vary substantially among countries, age categories and ethnic groups and this can be explained by variations in population characteristics and methodological dissimilarities between studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: A new formulation of propofol 6% in Lipofundin MCT/LCT 10% (propofol 6% SAZN) has been developed in order to reduce the fat, emulsifier and volume load that is given during prolonged infusions of propofol. The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety characteristics of propofol 6% SAZN were investigated during a short-term infusion and compared with the commercially available product propofol 1% in Intralipid 10% (Diprivan-10) and propofol 1% in Lipofundin MCT/LCT 10% (propofol 1% SAZN). Methods: In a randomised double-blind study, 24 male patients received a 5-h infusion of propofol at the rate of 1 mg/kg/h for sedation in the immediate postoperative period following coronary artery bypass surgery. Results: The average pharmacokinetic parameter estimates of clearance (Cl), volume of distribution at steady state (Vd,ss), elimination half-life (t1/2,β) and distribution half-life (t1/2,α) observed in the three groups were 28 ± 1.1 ml/kg/min, 1.8 ± 0.12 l/kg, 94 ± 4.1 min and 3.1 ± 0.26 min, respectively (mean ± SEM, n=24) and no significant differences were noted between the three formulations (P > 0.05). In one patient receiving propofol 6% SAZN, in two patients receiving propofol 1% SAZN and in three patients receiving Diprivan-10, the level of sedation was inadequate and additional sedative medication had to be given. In all other 18 patients, the level of sedation was adequate. The mean propofol concentration in these six inadequately sedated patients was lower than the adequately sedated patients (P=0.015). The serum triglyceride concentrations were not significantly different between the groups studied. No adverse events occurred in any of the patients. Conclusions: The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety characteristics of propofol 6% SAZN are in good agreement with those of the 1% formulations. Propofol 6% SAZN therefore provides a useful alternative to the commercially available 1% formulation for short-term sedation in the intensive care unit. Expected advantages in long-term sedation of the 6% over 1% formulation are the subject of an ongoing study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]