Search

Clinical implication of a single abnormal value (SAV) in the 100 g oral glucose tolerance test during pregnancy has not been established. We aimed to evaluate the risk of postpartum type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and investigate adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with SAV, using a retrospective database, from seven medical centers of Korea. Based on the Carpenter-Coustan criteria using two-step approach, pregnancy and postpartum outcomes were compared, among normoglycemic, SAV, and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) groups. Among 9353 women, 342 (3.66%) and 418(4.47%) women were included in SAV and GDM groups, respectively. SAV and GDM groups showed significantly higher rates of postpartum T2DM than normoglycemic group (7.60%, 14.83%, and 1.82%, respectively, p < 0.001). And SAV group showed significantly higher rates of pregnancy associated hypertension, preterm birth, and neonatal hypoglycemia and sepsis, compared to normoglycemic group (neonatal sepsis, p = 0.008; the others, p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, postpartum T2DM was associated with SAV, GDM (with/without insulin), nulliparity, pre-pregnancy BMI, chronic hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and DM family history. A scoring model to predict postpartum T2DM within 5 years, achieved an area under the curve of 0.74. This study demonstrated that not only GDM, but also SAV is a significant risk factor for postpartum T2DM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To assess the risk gradient of chromosomal abnormalities and fetal or neonatal death across a socioeconomic spectrum of pregnant women. Methods: We used the data from the Korean Prenatal Diagnosis Study (KPDS), which included singleton pregnancies who were candidates for fetal aneuploidy screening enrolled from the Seoul Capital Area from December 2016 to April 2018. We analyzed chromosomal abnormalities which were diagnosed pre- or postnatally, and fetal or neonatal death. The highest level of education among the women and the average monthly household income were used as proxies for socioeconomic status. Results: Among the 6,715 women, the majority of were 30–39 years old and university graduates, with a reported household income higher than the national median. Chromosomal abnormalities occurred in 45 women (6.7 per 1,000). Fetal or neonatal death occurred in 70 (11.3 per 1,000), excluding pregnancies affected by chromosomal abnormality diagnosis. The adjusted odds ratio for chromosomal abnormalities was higher when household income was < 4,484 USD per month. For fetal or neonatal death, the risk estimates for lower education and lower household income were generally positive but remained imprecise. Conclusion: We observed some evidence of an inverse association between the risk of fetal chromosomal abnormality and level of household income in a prospective cohort of pregnant women. Interventions to reduce socioeconomic disparities in perinatal health should focus on those with a low household income. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To investigate whether women with a short cervical length (CL), but delivered at term in the first pregnancy might have increased risks of having short cervix and spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB) in the subsequent pregnancies. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study including singleton gestations who were delivered between Jan 2011 and Dec 2018, who had had one childbirth experience and who had transvaginal sonographic CL assessment performed at mid-trimester (18 ~ 30 weeks) in both pregnancy. The women were divided into four group according to the history of preterm birth and a short cervix (< 25 mm before 30 weeks of gestation): (1) the Preterm-short cervix group, (2) the Preterm-no shortening group, (3) the Term-short cervix group, and (4) the Term-no shortening group. We compared the risk of having short cervix and sPTB during the second pregnancy of women. Secondary outcomes were threatened preterm labor, need for tocolytics, and cerclage placement. Results: A total of 804 women met our inclusion criteria. The rate of having short cervix (< 25 mm before 28 weeks of gestation) during the second pregnancy in women in the Term-short cervix group (43.2%) was significantly higher than those in women in the Term-no shortening group (6.6%), and in the Preterm-no shortening group (8.8%) (all p < 0.001 with Bonferroni correction), but not higher than those in women with the Preterm-short cervix group (30.8%, p > 0.05 with Bonferroni correction). When compared with women in the Preterm-no shortening group, women in the Term-short cervix group were also at an increased risk of need for need of tocolytics (60.2% vs. 26.5%) and cerclage placement (15.9% vs. 6.1%, all p < 0.001). Women in the Term-short cervix group had an increased risk of sPTB (< 37 weeks) during the second pregnancy, as compared to those in the Term-no shortening group (adjusted odds ratio 5.098, 95% CI 2.107–11.874). Conclusion: Women with a history of short cervix in their first pregnancy, but who delivered at term, were at increased risk of having a short cervix and sPTB in their second pregnancy, as compared to women with a history of term delivery without cervical shortening. Thus, short cervix of the previous pregnancy might be a predictive factors for preterm birth in the subsequent pregnancy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Multiple pregnancies are prone to gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). This study investigated the association between pregravid liver enzyme levels and the development of GDM in a twin pregnancy. Women who had the National Health Screening Examination and delivered their twin babies within one year were enrolled. Pregravid liver enzyme levels were divided into high and low level. Risks for developing GDM by high levels of liver enzymes were analyzed, in subgroups by pregravid obesity or metabolic syndrome. Among the 4348 twin pregnancies, 369 women (8.5%) developed GDM not requiring insulin treatment (GDM − IT), and 119 women (2.7%) developed GDM requiring insulin treatment(GDM + IT). High levels of pregravid GGT and ALT were related to risks of GDM + IT not only in women with obesity or metabolic syndrome (odds ratio[OR] 6.348, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.579–15.624 and OR 6.879, 95% CI 2.232–21.204, respectively), but also in women without obesity (OR 3.05, 95% CI 1.565–5.946) or without metabolic syndrome (OR 3.338, 95% CI 1.86–5.992), compared to in women with low levels of those. However, there were no significant associations in the pregravid ALT and GGT levels and risks for development of GDM − IT, unrelated to pregravid obesity or metabolic syndrome. Therefore, this study suggests that women with high levels of pregravid GGT and ALT need to recognize their increased risk of GDM + IT, regardless of pregravid obesity or MetS, when they get pregnant twin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To investigate the gestational age-specific risk of stillbirth according to the maternal age group particularly regarding stillbirth risk at the end of pregnancy.Methods: This study was a retrospective national cohort study of all singleton term pregnancy using the Korean Vital Statistics database (n = 2,798,542). We evaluated the risk of stillbirth by gestational week in mothers aged 20-49 years according to maternal age group and neonatal birth weight.Results: The risk of stillbirth in women aged 41 years and older was significantly higher than in women aged 20-29 years between 37 and 40 weeks' gestation. The stillbirth rate per 10,000 ongoing pregnancy in women aged 37-38 years at 39 weeks' gestation (4.22, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 3.01-5.90) and that in women aged 39-40 years at 40 weeks' gestation (8.15, 95% CI 4.83-13.77) were significantly higher in comparison with in those aged 20-29 years at 39 weeks' gestation (1.95, 95% CI 1.64-2.33) and at 40 weeks' gestation (2.59, 95% CI 2.1-3,18). The risk of stillbirth showed an increasing pattern at 40 gestational weeks, in women aged 39 years and older.Conclusions: Delivery plan need to be set up and supported to decrease rates of stillbirth at term in women aged 35 years and older with other risk factors and in women aged 37 years and older regardless of risk factors, and especially in women older than 40 years of age. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]