Search

Histiocytic sarcoma (HS) is a rare yet lethal malignancy with no established standard of care therapies. A lack of pre-clinical models limits our understanding of HS pathogenesis and identification of therapeutic targets. Canine HS shares multiple clinical and genetic similarities with human HS, supporting its use as a unique translational model. Prior studies have investigated the immunogenicity of HS. Although increased tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) density is associated with favorable outcomes in canine HS, virtually all canine patients eventually succumb to progressive disease consistent with ultimate failure of anti-tumor immunity. To investigate potential regulators of the immune tumor microenvironment (TME), we undertook a comparative transcriptional approach of three long-lived cases of canine pulmonary HS with heavy T cell infiltrate and three short-lived cases of splenic HS that lacked significant T cell inflammation and compared these data to corresponding grossly normal tissues from dogs undergoing necropsy. This comparison identified PDCD1, encoding the immune checkpoint PD-1, and SPP1, encoding the secreted pro-tumorigenic protein osteopontin, as positive differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in canine HS. TXNIP, encoding the tumor suppressor TXNIP, was the most significant negative DEG. Comparative transcriptomic studies revealed conservation of enriched (including SPP1) and depleted (including TXNIP) DEGs between canine and human HS patients. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated osteopontin in the TMEs of canine and human HS. Collectively, we uncover PD-1, osteopontin, and TXNIP as putative actionable targets in HS and further establish canine HS as a preclinical platform to screen novel immunotherapeutic approaches for this deadly disease. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Opinion statement: Sarcomas are a rare group of tumors with many subtypes, conventionally classified into soft-tissue sarcomas and bone sarcomas. Chemotherapeutic regimens form the mainstay of systemic therapy but are not well defined beyond the first-line setting and clinical outcomes are variable. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), with a broad inhibition profile which have been shown to target tumor angiogenesis, have an established role in the treatment of sarcomas without characteristic driver alterations. One such TKI, regorafenib, has been evaluated in sarcomas and clinical data are discussed in this review. An overview of regorafenib data from five phase 2 and one phase 1b clinical trials in over 10 sarcoma subtypes (both soft-tissue and bone) in adult and pediatric patients is reviewed. Regorafenib demonstrated clinical benefit in patients with non-adipocytic soft-tissue sarcomas, osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma who had progressed on prior therapy. Patients with otherwise limited treatment options may therefore benefit from regorafenib therapy. Plain language summary: Sarcomas are a type of cancer that start from the bones or soft tissues (such as muscle, blood vessel, or fat tissue) anywhere in the body. Sarcomas are rare – only about 1% of all cancers are sarcomas, and there are many different types. Sarcomas occur more often in children than in adults. People with sarcomas which cannot be removed by surgery are usually treated with chemotherapy first, but chemotherapy may only help some people and can cause a lot of side effects. Only a few chemotherapies work in sarcomas, and if they do not work or stop working the patient does not have many other treatment options. A different type of therapy known as "tyrosine kinase inhibitors" may work in these patients. These medicines, usually swallowed as a pill, target the way that sarcoma cells grow and may help patients in whom chemotherapy has not worked. Medical doctors and scientists tested "regorafenib", a type of tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in clinical trials. This publication summarizes the results from six clinical trials that tested regorafenib in over 500 adults, teenagers, and children with sarcomas. People included in these trials had more than ten different types of sarcomas in total, and usually had already received a treatment that had not stopped the sarcoma from growing. Regorafenib treatment helped people with certain types of sarcomas that developed from bones or soft tissues, but not fat tissue. Doctors also managed the side effects of regorafenib well for patients in these trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Histiocytic sarcoma (HS) is a rare and aggressive tumor in humans with no universally agreed standard of care therapy. Spontaneous canine HS exhibits increased prevalence in specific breeds, shares key genetic and biologic similarities with the human disease, and occurs in an immunocompetent setting. Previous data allude to the immunogenicity of this disease in both species, highlighting the potential for their successful treatment with immunotherapy. Quantification of CD3 tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) in five cases of human HS revealed variable intra-tumoral T cell infiltration. Due to the paucity of human cases and lack of current model systems in which to appraise associations between anti-tumor immunity and treatment-outcome in HS, we analyzed clinical data and quantified TIL in 18 dogs that were previously diagnosed with localized HS and treated with curative-intent tumor resection with or without adjuvant chemotherapy. As in humans, assessment of TIL in biopsy tissues taken at diagnosis reveal a spectrum of immunologically "cold" to "hot" tumors. Importantly, we show that increased CD3 and granzyme B TIL are positively associated with favorable outcomes in dogs following surgical resection. NanoString transcriptional analyses revealed increased T cell and antigen presentation transcripts associated with prolonged survival in canine pulmonary HS and a decreased tumor immunogenicity profile associated with shorter survivals in splenic HS. Based on these findings, we propose that spontaneous canine HS is an accessible and powerful novel model to study tumor immunology and will provide a unique platform to preclinically appraise the efficacy and tolerability of anti-cancer immunotherapies for HS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This subgroup analysis of a phase 3 study compares outcomes for eribulin versus dacarbazine in patients with leiomyosarcoma.Methods: Patients ≥18 years old with advanced liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma, ECOG PS ≤2, and ≥2 prior treatment regimens were randomly assigned (1:1) to eribulin mesylate (1.4 mg/m² intravenously on day 1 and day 8) or dacarbazine (either 850, 1000, or 1200 mg/m² intravenously) every 21 days until disease progression. The primary end point was OS; additional end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR).Results: 309 Patients with leiomyosarcoma were included (eribulin, n = 157; dacarbazine, n = 152). Median age was 57 years; 42% of patients had uterine disease and 57% had nonuterine disease. Median OS was 12.7 versus 13.0 months for eribulin versus dacarbazine, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.93 [95% CI 0.71-1.20]; P = 0.57). Median PFS (2.2 vs 2.6 months, HR = 1.07 [95% CI 0.84-1.38]; P = 0.58) and ORR (5% vs 7%) were similar between eribulin- and dacarbazine-treated patients. Grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 69% of patients receiving eribulin and 59% of patients receiving dacarbazine.Conclusions: Efficacy of eribulin in patients with leiomyosarcoma was comparable to that of dacarbazine. Both agents had manageable safety profiles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]