Search

Context: Due to the expected decrease in the availability of conventional oils, numerous studies are currently underway to find complementary sources of energy. Among the explored avenue is that of biofuels. Ethyl valerate (ETV) and tripropionin (TPP) are two biofuels whose thermal decomposition has not received the attention it deserves. Herein, we have evaluated the bond dissociation enthalpies (BDHs) to predict how easy it is to break some bonds in these compounds, and subsequently contribute to revealing the initiation step in their combustion reactions. Our computations consistently predict C4-C5 and C1-C2 bonds in ETV and TPP as the weakest bonds, likely to break first and initiate the thermal decomposition of these two compounds, respectively. The conformational changes in ETV and TPP have only a small influence on the BDHs of 1 kcal/mol at M06-2X/6–311 + G(3df,2p). B3LYP and ωB97XD appear to be the most affordable methods for estimating BDHs at 6-31G(d,p) as they give good results for ETV (RMSD: 2.94 kcal/mol and 3.22 kcal/mol) and performed better than CBS-QB3 (RMSD: 3.64 kcal/mol). Using a larger basis set, the M06-2X (RMSD: 3.61 kcal/mol) and ωB97XD (RMSD: 3.51 kcal/mol) functionals are found to provide the most accurate predictions at 6–311 + G(3df,2p) as compared to G4MP2. Methods: BDHs of ETV and TPP are computed using density functional theory (DFT) and quantum chemistry composite methods at 6-31G(d,p) and 6–311 + G(3df,2p) levels. Because of its reliability and accuracy in thermochemical calculations, the G4MP2 theory is used as a reference to gauge the performance of DFT methods. All the calculations were carried out using the Gaussian 09 program. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Herein, we report a quantum chemistry investigation of the interaction between µ-truxinic acid, referred to as TXA0, and Y+ (Y = Li, Na, K) and Z− (Z = F, Cl, Br) ions using M06-2X, B3LYP and ω B97XD functionals in conjunction with the 6–31 + + G(d,p), aug-cc-pVDZ(-X2C) and 6–311 + + G (d, p) basis sets. Our computations suggest that Y+ cations can bind to TXA0 through several combinations of cation...O and cation-π interactions, while Z− anions generally establish anion...H–O contacts. Predicted binding energies at the M06-2X/6–311 + + G(d,p) level range between − 26.6 and − 70.2 kcal/mol for cationic complexes and − 20.4 and − 62.3 kcal/mol for anionic ones. As such, TXA0 appears as an amphoteric molecule with a slight preference for electrophilic (cation... O) attacks. Furthermore, the most favourable binding site for cations allows for the formation of O...cation...O interactions where the cation is trapped between O37 and O38 atoms of TXA0. Anions do not behave uniformly towards TXA0: while the fluoride anion F− induces the deprotonation of TXA0, Br− and Cl− do not. All of these structural insights are supported by topological calculations in the context of the quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM). Finally, SAPT0 analyses suggest that TXA0...Y+ and TXA0...Z− complexes are mainly stabilized by electrostatic and inductive effects, whose combined contributions account for more than 60 percent of the total interaction energy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]