1. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting lumbo-sacral nerve root compromise: a systematic literature review
- Author
-
Anthea Rhoda, Nassib Tawa, and Ina Diener
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Nerve root ,Sports medicine ,Sensitivity and Specificity ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Rheumatology ,Diagnosis ,medicine ,Humans ,Medical history ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Radiculopathy ,Accuracy ,Lumbar Nerve ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Lumbosacral Region ,Magnetic resonance imaging ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,Diffusion Tensor Imaging ,Systematic review ,Orthopedic surgery ,Physical therapy ,Electronic data ,Lumbo-sacral radiculopathy ,Radiology ,Spinal Nerve Roots ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Research Article ,MRI - Abstract
Background MRI is considered to be the diagnostic tool of choice in diagnosing nerve root compromise among patients presenting with clinical suspicion of lumbo-sacral radiculopathy. There exists controversy among researchers and clinicians regarding the diagnostic utility and accuracy of MRI in detecting nerve root compromise and radiculopathy. This review evaluated 4 primary diagnostic accuracy studies that specifically assessed the accuracy of MRI in detecting nerve root compromise, as established in the current literature. Methods Eight electronic data bases were searched for relevant articles from inception until January 2014. All primary diagnostic studies which investigated the accuracy of MRI in diagnosing nerve root compromise among patients with low back and referred leg symptoms were screened for inclusion. Qualifying studies were retrieved and independently assessed for methodological quality using the ‘Quality Assessment of Diagnostic tests Accuracy Studies’ criteria. Results Four studies qualified for inclusion in this review. The sensitivity of MRI in detecting lumbar nerve root compromise was very low at 0.25 (95 % CI) while the specificity was relatively high at 0.92 (95 % CI). Conclusions There is lack of sufficient high quality scientific evidence in support or against the use of MRI in diagnosing nerve root compression and radiculopathy. Therefore, clinicians should always correlate the findings of MRI with the patients’ medical history and clinical presentation in clinical decision making.
- Full Text
- View/download PDF