Search

The current study aimed to analyze the validity and reliability of the T-Force and Chronojump systems to measure the movement velocity in the leg press (LP) and chest press (CP) exercises in older people. Eighteen older adults (6 men and 12 women, 79.9 ± 8.5 years) performed a set of procedures over three weeks: (i) the first week was to familiarize participants with the testing procedures, (ii) the second was to perform a progressive loading test until reaching one-repetition maximum (1RM) in the LP and CP, and (iii) in the third week, participants performed three repetitions against five loads (40, 50, 60, 70, and 80% of 1RM). The mean velocity of each repetition was recorded simultaneously through the T-Force and Chronojump devices. Linear regressions (coefficient of determination [r2] and standard error of the estimate [SEE]) analyzed the inter-device validity, and Bland-Altman plots illustrated the systematic differences between devices. A mixed-effects model estimated the mean velocity differences between devices. The relative reliability was analyzed by the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC[1,k]), while the absolute reliability was by the standard error of measurement (SEM) and the coefficient of variation (CV). The results showed that the T-Force and Chronojump presented a high association level in measuring mean velocity in the LP and CP (r2 range: 0.96–0.99; SEE range: 0.01–0.02 m·s− 1) and low systematic bias (0.02–0.03 m·s− 1). The mean velocity values of T-Force were significantly higher than Chronojump only for 40% 1RM (p = 0.04). Excellent reliability inter-device (ICC range: 0.95–0.98; CV range: 1.7–3.2%) and intra-device (ICC range: 0.90–0.97; CV range: 3.4–6.5%) was observed. This study shows that the T-Force and Chronojump systems are valid and reliable for measuring movement velocity in the CP and LP machines when used by older adults. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Effective manipulation of the acute variables of resistance training is critical to optimizing muscle and functional adaptations in middle-aged and older adults. However, the ideal volume prescription (e.g., number of sets performed per exercise) in middle-aged and older adults remains inconclusive in the literature. Objective: The effects of single versus multiple sets per exercise on muscle strength and size, muscle quality, and functional capacity in middle-aged and older adults were compared. Moreover, the effects of single versus multiple sets per exercise on muscular and functional gains were also examined, considering the influence of training duration. Methods: Randomized controlled trials and non-randomized controlled trials comparing single versus multiple sets per exercise on muscle strength, muscle size, muscle quality, or functional capacity in middle-aged and older adults (aged ≥ 50 years) in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases (01/09/2021, updated on 15/05/2022) were identified. A random-effects meta-analysis was used. Results: Fifteen studies were included (430 participants; 93% women; age 57.9–70.1 years). Multiple sets per exercise produced a greater effect than single sets on lower-limb strength (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.07–0.51; mean difference [MD] = 1.91 kg; 95% CI 0.50–3.33) and muscle quality (SMD = 0.40; 95% CI 0.05–0.75) gains. There were no differences between single versus multiple sets per exercise for upper-limb strength (SMD = 0.13; 95% CI − 0.14 to 0.40; MD = 0.11 kg; 95% CI − 0.52 to 0.75), muscle size (SMD = 0.15; 95% CI − 0.07 to 0.37), and functional capacity (SMD = 0.01; 95% CI − 0.47 to 0.50) gains. In addition, there were no differences between single versus multiple sets on muscle strength and size gains for training durations ≤ 12 weeks or > 12 weeks. Conclusions: Multiple sets per exercise produced greater lower-limb strength and muscle quality gains than single sets in middle-aged and older adults, although the magnitude of the difference was small. In contrast, single sets per exercise were sufficient to improve upper-limb strength, muscle size, and functional capacity in these populations. Despite these findings, researchers should conduct future high-quality, pre-registered, and blinded randomized controlled trials to strengthen the scientific evidence on this topic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In team sports, it is imperative that the warm-up improves acute explosive performance. However, the exact strategies, methods, and consequences of different warm-up practices remain unclear. A time delay between the warm-up and match and during half-time could negate the positive metabolic effects of the warm-up.Objectives: We conducted a systematic review to synthesize and analyze the potential effects of strategies during a warm-up (before match), post-warm-up (time between the end of warm-up and the start of a match), and re-warm-up (half-time break within a match) on explosive performance in team sports. Furthermore, we examined optimal warm-up strategies based on the included studies.Methods: We performed a search of four databases (Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, and ScienceDirect) for original research articles published between January 1981 and August 2017. A total of 30 articles met the inclusion criteria, and the Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess the risk of bias. The results of the included studies were recalculated to determine effect sizes using Cohen’s d.Results: A warm-up comprising 8 sets of 60-m sprints (− 2.19%, d = 1.20) improved sprint performance. Additionally, 7 min of dynamic exercises after 5 min of jogging improved sprint (− 7.69%, d = 1.72), jumping (8.61%, d = 0.61), and agility performance (− 6.65%, d = 1.40). The use of small-sided games also seems to be a valid strategy, especially for jumping performance (6%, d = 0.8). These benefits resulted from the warm-up strategies combined with some passive rest (between 2 and 10 min) before the main performance. In this post-warm-up period, the use of heated garments could result in better outcomes than simple rest (− 0.89%, d = 0.39). However, if the transition was longer than 15 min, before entering the match, performing a re-warm-up with short-term explosive tasks to reactivate was the most effective approach (− 1.97%, d = − 0.86). At half-time, heated garments maintained better sprint (− 1.45%, d = 2.21) and jumping performance (3.13%, d = 1.62).Conclusion: Applying properly structured strategies in the warm-up and avoiding a long rest in the post-warm-up improves explosive performance. Studies tend to recommend a short active warm-up strategy (10-15 min), gradually increasing intensity (~ 50-90% of maximum heart rate), and the use of heated garments soon after the warm-up to maintain muscle temperature. However, 2 min of active re-warm-up with short-term sprints and jumps should be needed for transitions longer than 15 min (~ 90% of maximum heart rate). Last, at the half-time re-warm-up, combining heated garments to maintain muscle temperature and performing an active strategy, with explosive tasks or small-sided games for 5 min before re-entering the game, resulted in better explosive performance than 15 min of resting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]