Search

Objective: We describe the current treatment of elderly patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) enrolled in a national registry. Methods: The POPular AGE registry is a prospective, multicentre study of patients ≥ 75 years of age presenting with NSTEMI, performed in the Netherlands. Management was at the discretion of the treating physician. Cardiovascular events consisted of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and ischaemic stroke. Bleeding was classified according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria. Results: A total of 646 patients were enrolled between August 2016 and May 2018. Median age was 81 (IQR 77–84) years and 58% were male. Overall, 75% underwent coronary angiography, 40% percutaneous coronary intervention, and 11% coronary artery bypass grafting, while 49.8% received pharmacological therapy only. At discharge, dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitor) was prescribed to 56.7%, and 27.4% received oral anticoagulation plus at least one antiplatelet agent. At 1‑year follow-up, cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction or stroke had occurred in 13.6% and major bleeding (BARC 3 and 5) in 3.9% of patients. The risk of both cardiovascular events and major bleeding was highest during the 1st month. However, cardiovascular risk was three times as high as bleeding risk in this elderly population, both after 1 month and after 1 year. Conclusions: In this national registry of elderly patients with NSTEMI, the majority are treated according to current European Society of Cardiology guidelines. Both the cardiovascular and bleeding risk are highest during the 1st month after NSTEMI. However, the cardiovascular risk was three times as high as the bleeding risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The objective of this study was to develop and validate a risk scale (MARIACHI) for patients classified as non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) in a prehospital setting with the ability to identify patients at an increased risk of mortality at an early stage. Methods: A retrospective observational study conducted in Catalonia over two periods: 2015–2017 (development and internal validation cohort) and Aug 2018–Jan 2019 (external validation cohort). We included patients classified as prehospital NSTEACS, assisted by an advanced life support unit and requiring hospital admission. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Cohorts were compared using logistic regression and a predictive model was created using bootstrapping techniques. Results: The development and internal validation cohort included 519 patients. The model is composed of five variables associated with hospital mortality: age, systolic blood pressure, heart rate > 95 bpm, Killip-Kimball III–IV and ST depression ≥ 0.5 mm. The model showed good overall performance (Brier = 0.043) and consistency in discrimination (AUC 0.88, 95% CI 0.83–0.92) and calibration (slope = 0.91; 95% CI 0.89–0.93). We included 1316 patients for the external validation sample. There was no difference in discrimination (AUC 0.83, 95% CI 0.78–0.87; DeLong Test p = 0.071), but there was in calibration (p < 0.001), so it was recalibrated. The finally model obtained was stratified and scored into three groups according to the predicted risk of patient in-hospital mortality: low risk: < 1% (-8 to 0 points), moderate risk: 1–5% (+ 1 to + 5 points) and high risk: > 5% (6–12 points). Conclusion: The MARIACHI scale showed correct discrimination and calibration to predict high-risk NSTEACS. Identification of high-risk patients may help with treatment and low referral decisions at the prehospital level. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: This investigation aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) for in-hospital and long-term mortality in elderly patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Methods: This retrospective investigation included 314 consecutive elderly NSTEMI patients in a tertiary center. SII is computed as (neutrophils × platelets)/lymphocytes. Based on the increased SII values, we classified the research sample into three tertile groups as T1, T2, and T3. The in-hospital and long-term mortality were defined as the primary outcomes. Results: Patients in the T3 group had lower chances of survival in the in-hospital and long-term periods compared with those in the T2 and T1 groups. According to the multivariable Cox regression models, SII independently related with in-hospital (hazard ratio (HR): 1.001, 95% CI: 1.000–1.1003, p = 0.038) and long-term mortality (HR: 1.004, 95% CI: 1.002–1.006, p < 0.001). To predict long-term mortality, the optimal SII value was > 2174 with 80% sensitivity and 85.4% specificity. SII had a slightly lower but statistically non-inferior discriminative ability for long-term mortality compared with the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) in the receiver operating characteristic curve comparison (AUC: 86.2 vs. AUC: 890, p > 0.05). Additionally, combining SII with traditional risk factors and the CCI revealed a significant improvement in C-statistics. Conclusion: This investigation may be the first to demonstrate that SII is independently linked with in-hospital and long-term mortality in elderly NSTEMI patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To analyse non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) care in the Netherlands and to identify modifiable factors to improve NSTEMI healthcare. Methods: This retrospective cohort study analysed hospital and pharmacy claims data of all NSTEMI patients in the Netherlands in 2015. The effect of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during hospitalisation on 1‑year mortality was investigated in the subcohort alive 4 days after NSTEMI. The effect of medical treatment on 1‑year mortality was assessed in the subcohort alive 30 days after NSTEMI. The effect of age, gender and co-morbidities was evaluated. PCI during hospitalisation was defined as PCI within 72 h after NSTEMI and optimal medical treatment was defined as the combined use of an aspirin species, P2Y12 inhibitor, statin, beta-blocker and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker, started within 30 days after NSTEMI. Results: Data from 17,997 NSTEMI patients (age 69.6 (SD = 12.8) years, 64% male) were analysed. Of the patients alive 4 days after NSTEMI, 43% had a PCI during hospitalisation and 1‑year mortality was 10%. In the subcohort alive 30 days after NSTEMI, 47% of patients were receiving optimal medical treatment at 30 days and 1‑year mortality was 7%. PCI during hospitalisation (odds ratio (OR) 0.42; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.37–0.48) and optimal medical treatment (OR 0.59; 95% CI 0.51–0.67) were associated with a lower 1‑year mortality. Conclusion: In Dutch NSTEMI patients, use of PCI during hospitalisation and prescription of optimal medical treatment are modest. As both are independently associated with a lower 1‑year mortality, this study provides direction on how to improve the quality of NSTEMI healthcare in the Netherlands. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: To investigate the long-term prognostic value of aspiration thrombectomy in conjunction with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared to conventional PCI in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). Methods: In the randomized TATORT-NSTEMI (Thrombus aspiration in thrombus containing culprit lesions in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction) trial, NSTEMI patients with thrombus containing culprit lesions were randomized to either PCI with aspiration thrombectomy or conventional PCI. The endpoint was a combination of all-cause death, reinfarction and new congestive heart failure. Results: From 440 patients initially randomized, outcome data were available in 432 (98.2%) patients at a median follow-up of 4.9 (interquartile range [IQR] 4.4–5.0) years. Thrombectomy was associated with a significant reduction of the combined endpoint compared to conventional PCI (19.9% vs. 30.7%, p = 0.01). This finding was primarily driven by a reduced rate of reinfarction with thrombectomy (3.4% vs. 10.3%, p = 0.01). Thrombectomy was still independently associated with the combined endpoint after multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio [HR] 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.30–0.76, p = 0.002). Findings were consistent across all analyzed subgroups (p values for interaction all > 0.05). Conclusions: In NSTEMI, thrombus aspiration is associated with favorable clinical outcome during long-term follow-up. Clinical trial registration: NCT01612312. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Myocarditis and myocardial infarction share a common clinical characteristics despite significant differences in etiology and pathogenesis. Current guidelines recommend using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or endocardial biopsy for a definite diagnosis; however, these guidelines are not fully implemented due to the high cost and low availability. We used a thrombin generation assay and simple blood test to characterize both diseases. We conducted a cross-sectional study from April to December 2018. Patients with initial clinical suspicions of non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) or myocarditis were eligible. All patients were recruited prior to anticoagulant treatment. Patients in both groups underwent acceptable standard clinical evaluation. Twenty-eight patients were enrolled; 12 patients in the NSTEMI group and 16 in the myocarditis group. Patients in the NSTEMI group were significantly older than those in the myocarditis group (64.25 ± 9.67 vs. 37.94 ± 19.66 years, p < 0.01, respectively) with a higher prevalence of hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, and ischemic heart disease (p < 0.01 for all). There was no difference between the groups regarding INR, PT, aPTT, and serum levels of creatinine, urea, CPK, troponin, and fibrinogen. Endogenous thrombin potential (ETP), which represents the total thrombin concentration in the plasma, was significantly higher in the myocarditis group than in the NSTEMI group (2091.88 ± 336.41 vs. 1860.75 ± 438.02 nM × min, p < 0.03). Myocarditis and myocardial infarction have a different pattern of thrombin generation Thrombogram. The myocarditis group had significantly higher plasma ETP than the NSTEMI group. This finding requires further evaluation to define a numerical threshold, thus avoiding invasive or expensive assessment of myocarditis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: To compare ischaemia-driven complete coronary revascularisation by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with usual care in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (non-STEMI) and multivessel disease (MVD). Methods: The South Limburg Myocardial Infarction (SLIM) trial (NCT03562572) is an investigator-initiated, prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial that compares fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided complete revascularisation during the index procedure with usual care in non-STEMI patients with MVD. A total of 414 patients will be randomised in a 1:1 fashion. The primary endpoint is the composite of all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and any revascularisation and stroke (MACCE) at 12 months. The secondary endpoints are: MACCE at 24 and 36 months, and the composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, any revascularisation, stroke, major bleeding and left ventricular ejection fraction below 45% at 12, 24 and 36 months. Furthermore, quality of life will be assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and the Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36) at 1 and 12 months of follow-up. Conclusion: The SLIM trial aims to provide evidence whether FFR-guided complete revascularisation by PCI is superior to usual care with respect to clinical outcomes (major adverse cardiovascular events) in non-STEMI patients with MVD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is suggested for treating patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) to reduce adverse cardiovascular events. However, the short- and long-term effects of PCI on the risk of postdischarge ischemic stroke (IS) in patients hospitalized for NSTEMI remain unclear. This study investigated the association of PCI on the risk of postdischarge IS in patients hospitalized for NSTEMI at different period follow-ups. A population-based cohort study was conducted using data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to select 6079 pairs of the patients with NSTEMI treated invasively by PCI (received PCI during hospitalization) and initial conservative strategy (did not receive PCI during hospitalization) with similar baseline characteristics for evaluation. After adjustment for patients' clinical variables and the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy, PCI was associated with a decreased risk of postdischarge IS at 6-month, 1-year, and 3-year follow-ups [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 0.41, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.26–0.67, p < 0.001; aHR = 0.61, 95% CI 0.43–0.86, p = 0.004; and aHR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.54–0.89, p = 0.005respectively]. In the patients who had a CHA2DS2-VASc score of ≥2, PCI was also associated with a decreased risk of postdischarge IS at 6-month, 1-year, and 3-year follow-ups (aHR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.36–0.83, p = 0.005; aHR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.52–1.00, p = 0.048; and aHR =0.73, 95% CI 0.58–0.91, p = 0.005, respectively). These findings suggested that PCI might reduce the risk of postdischarge IS in patients hospitalized for NSTEMI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Der Internist is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Data derived from several studies suggest a better survival in smokers with acute myocardial infarction, a phenomenon referred to as the 'smoker's paradox'. We aimed to investigate the association of smoking with cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging determined infarct severity and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) defined as the occurrence of death, reinfarction, and congestive heart failure at 12 months in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) reperfused by early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In this multicenter, registry study 311 NSTEMI patients underwent CMR imaging 3 (interquartile range [IQR] 2-4) days after PCI. Myocardial salvage index (MSI), infarct size (IS), and microvascular obstruction (MVO) as well as MACE rate were compared according to admission smoking status. Approximately one-third of patients were current smokers (n = 122, 39%). Smokers were significantly younger and less likely to have hypertension as compared to non-smokers (all p < 0.05). The extent of MSI (63.2, IQR 28.9-85.4 vs. 65.6, IQR 42.2-82.9, p = 0.30), and IS (7.2, IQR 2.3-15.7%LV vs. 7.0, IQR 2.2-12.4%LV, p = 0.27) did not differ significantly between smokers and non-smokers. Despite similar prevalence of MVO, MVO (%LV) was higher in smokers compared to non-smokers (2.0, IQR 0.9-4.7%LV vs. 1.2, IQR 0.7-2.2%LV, p = 0.03). MACE rates at 12 months were comparable in smokers and non-smokers (5.7% vs. 7.4%, p = 0.65). In NSTEMI patients, smoking is neither associated with increased myocardial salvage nor less severe myocardial damage. Clinical outcome at 12 months was similar in smokers and non-smokers.Trial registration NCT03516578. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Der Kardiologe is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Herz is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

High sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) is synthesized mainly by hepatocytes in response to tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-1 (IL-1), and interleukin-6 (IL-6). The interaction of advanced glycation end products (AGEs) with the receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) increases the expression of the cytokines TNF-α, IL-1, and IL-6. Soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products (sRAGE) competes with RAGE for binding with AGEs. Hence, low sRAGE levels may increase interaction of AGEs with RAGE resulting in the increased production of cytokines. It is hypothesized that serum levels of sRAGE modulate serum levels of hs-CRP. The objectives are to determine if (i) serum levels of sRAGE are lower and those of TNF-α and hs-CRP are higher in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients compared to control subjects; (ii) serum levels of TNF-α and hs-CRP are positively correlated; and (iii) sRAGE is negatively correlated with hs-CRP and TNF-α. The study consisted of 36 patients with NSTEMI and 30 age-matched healthy male subjects. Serum levels of sRAGE and TNF-α were determined by enzyme-linked immunoassay and hs-CRP was measured using near infrared immunoassay. Serum levels of sRAGE were lower, while those of TNF-α and hs-CRP were higher in patients with NSTEMI compared to controls. The levels of sRAGE were negatively correlated with those of TNF-α and hs-CRP, while TNF-α was positively correlated with hs-CRP in both the control subjects and NSTEMI patients. The data suggest that sRAGE modulates the synthesis of hs-CRP through TNF-α. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Der Internist is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Der Internist is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Purpose of Review: Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) is an urgent medical condition that requires prompt application of simultaneous pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic therapies. The variation in patient clinical characteristics coupled with the multitude of treatment modalities makes optimal and timely management challenging. This review summarizes risk stratification of patients, the role and timing of revascularization, and highlights important considerations in the revascularization approach with attention to individual patient characteristics. Recent Findings: The early invasive management of NSTEMI has fostered a reduction in future ischemic events. Risk calculators are helpful in determining which patients should receive early invasive management. As many patients have multivessel disease, identifying the true culprit lesion can be challenging. Special attention should be given to those at the highest risk, such as diabetics, patients with renal failure, and those with left main disease. Summary: In patients with acute coronary syndrome, the decision and mode of revascularization should carefully integrate the patient's clinical characteristics as well as the complexity of the coronary anatomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]