Search

Half of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and elevated stroke risk do not receive anticoagulation (AC). Explanations for undertreatment may relate to provider lack of confidence with or knowledge of the CHA2DS2-VASc stroke calculator, unfamiliarity with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), or uncertainty about use of AC after bleeding events or other challenging patient scenarios. We surveyed cardiology and primary care providers (PCPs) within a large healthcare system to investigate prescriber knowledge, confidence, and comfort prescribing AC for AF in challenging scenarios. Of 112 providers invited, 70 (63%) completed our survey. Compared with non-responding providers, responding providers had fewer years in practice and more often worked in a university setting. Responding providers were moderately or very confident with use of CHA2DS2-VASc calculator (90%). Cardiology providers reported substantial knowledge about DOACs (72%) compared with PCPs (33%). Both provider groups reported reluctance prescribing AC when presented with challenging patient scenarios (% providers agreeing with AC): three falls over 6 months (36%), 2 weeks after resolved gastrointestinal bleed (21%), 4 weeks after intracranial bleeding (9%), in a patient consuming five alcoholic drinks per day (44%). All providers were moderately or very confident with using the CHA2DS2-VASc calculator, but only cardiology providers reported substantial knowledge about DOACs. Our providers were reluctant to prescribe AC after bleeding and in other common situations where use of AC may be appropriate. Education of PCPs about DOACs and development of guidelines to address challenging patient scenarios may improve AC prescription rates in patients with AF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose of Review: This review describes the dynamic relationship between diabetes mellitus (DM) and coronary artery disease (CAD) with respect to different revascularization strategies and how angiographic tools such as the Synergy between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score can supplement clinical decision-making.Recent Findings: The SYNTAX score characterizes the anatomical extent of CAD in terms of the number of lesions, functional importance, and complexity. Studies not limited to patients with DM suggest that percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a reasonable alternative to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with low-medium SYNTAX scores, while patients with high SYNTAX scores should be revascularized with CABG if operable. Similar findings were also observed for diabetes patients with multivessel disease in retrospective pooled analysis. The SYNTAX II score combines anatomical and clinical risk to improve upon the decision regarding the optimal revascularization strategy. The SYNTAX II score can be applied to patients with DM.Summary: The SYNTAX scores provide guidance to clinicians faced with determining the optimal revascularization strategy in patients with DM and advanced CAD. Using a heart team approach, the information can be considered along with other factors that influence PCI or CABG risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]