Search

Purpose: Postoperative seromas are a problem in the surgical treatment of breast cancer. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether the lysine-urethane-based tissue adhesive TissuGlu® without drainage is equal/ non-inferior to standard mastecomy with drainage. Methods: The study was designed as a prospective, randomized, multicentre non-inferiority study comparing the use of TissuGlu® without drainage with standard wound care with a drain insertion in ablative breast procedures. The number of clinical interventions, quality of life and wound complications were followed-up for 90 days in both groups. Results: Although the statistical power was not reached, twice as many clinical interventions were performed in the TissuGlu® group than in the drainage group, especially aspirations of clinically relevant seromas (p = 0.014). The TissuGlu® group produced overall less wound fluid, but developed a clinically relevant seroma (100% vs. 63%) which made an intervention necessary. Less hospitalisation time was observed in the TissuGlu® group, but the complication rate was higher. There was no significant difference in regards to postoperative pain. In summary the non-inferiority of TissuGlu® compared to standard drainage couldn't be reached. Discussion: The present evaluation shows no advantage of the tissue adhesive TissuGlu® in terms of seroma formation and frequency of intervention compared to a standard drainage for mastectomies, but the shorter inpatient stay certainly has a positive effect on the quality of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Acellular dermal matrix is increasingly used as caudolateral coverage for breast implants in immediate breast reconstruction after skin-sparing mastectomy or in the correction of implant-associated breast deformities. Matrices of human, bovine, and porcine origin are available. The purpose of this retrospective multicenter study was to report experiences with porcine acellular dermal matrices, as only limited data can be found in the literature. Methods: In the hospital databases of five institutions, 127 patients were identified who underwent breast reconstructions in 156 breasts using an acellular porcine dermal matrix. Medical records were reviewed. Patients were divided into three groups: immediate expander-implant or direct to implant reconstructions ( n = 98), delayed expander-implant reconstructions ( n = 14), and revision surgery for implant-associated breast deformities ( n = 44). Results: With a mean follow-up of 19.6 months, total major complication rate was 7.1 %: implant loss (3.2 %), skin flap necrosis (2.6 %), delayed skin healing (2.6 %), hematoma (1.9 %), seroma (1.3 %), infection (0.6 %), and capsular contracture (0.6 %). Total minor complication rate was 22.9 %, with seroma being the most frequent complication (19.2 %). In the group of immediate breast reconstructions, 20.4 % of the breasts had received radiotherapy in the past. These patients exhibited a significantly higher rate of seroma than patients without prior radiotherapy (35.0 vs. 14.9 %, p = 0.031). Conclusions: Complication rates using porcine acellular dermal matrix in breast reconstruction are comparable to complication rates reported in studies using human acellular dermal matrices. Thus, porcine acellular dermal matrices can safely be applied in breast reconstructive surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To investigate effects of menopausal status, oral contraceptives (OC), and postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT) on normal breast parenchymal contrast enhancement (CE) and non-mass-like enhancing areas in magnetic resonance mammography (MRM).Methods: A total of 459 female volunteers (mean age 49.1 ± 12.5 years) underwent T1-weighted 3D MRM 1-5 min after bolus injection of gadobutrol. Quantitative analysis was performed in normal breast parenchyma by manually tracing regions of interest and calculating percentage CE. Semiquantitative analysis was performed in non-mass-like enhancing areas, and signal intensity changes were characterised by five predefined kinetic curve types. The influence of OC (n = 69) and HT (n = 24) on CE was studied using random effects models.Results: Breast parenchymal enhancement was significantly higher in premenopausal than in postmenopausal women (P < 0.001). CE decreased significantly with the use of OC (P = 0.01), while HT had negligible effects (P = 0.52). Prevalence of kinetic curve types of non-mass-like enhancement differed strongly between pre- and postmenopausal women (P < 0.0001), but was similar in OC users and non-OC users (P = 0.61) as well as HT users and non-HT users (P = 0.77).Conclusions: Normal breast parenchymal enhancement and non-mass-like enhancing areas were strongly affected by menopausal status, while they were not affected by HT use and only moderately by OC use.Key Points: Breast parenchymal enhancement at MR mammography is stronger in premenopausal than postmenopausal women. The prevalence of strong enhancing non-mass-like areas is greater before menopause. Such enhancing non-mass-like areas may impair lesion detection in premenopausal women. Breast parenchymal enhancement is only marginally affected by hormone use. Discontinuation of hormone use before MR mammography may be unnecessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Der Gynäkologe is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)