Search

Forty-four male and female subjects with no history of falling and whose ages ranged from 10 to 68 years participated in a series of experiments to assess movement at the joints during gait while walking in a straight line, in pivot turns and in turns of 0.33 and 0.66 m diameter. Acceleration at the joints in the forward and side-to-side direction was measured by dual-axis accelerometers placed at the ankles, knees, hips, shoulders, and on the head. Eye movement was assessed from electrodes placed on the sides of the eyes. The results of the experiments showed that for people whose age was above 40 years, significant increases in the forward-back and side-to-side movements occurred at all joints and progressively increased with age. By age 60, adverse movement of the joints as much as quadrupled in many subjects when compared to people whose age was 20-30 years. The increase in joint acceleration occurred equally in the front-back and side-to-side planes. The mechanism of the increased joint movement may be due to tendon laxness, peripheral neuropathy or loss of central control of gait due to age. Accelerometry may be a much more sensitive technique to analyze abnormalities in gait than standard video or observational gait analysis. Results are given as mean (SD) unless otherwise stated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Data were collected from four male subjects to determine the relationships between load, speed and muscle use during cycle ergometry. These data were then used to construct equations to govern the stimulation of muscle in paralysed individuals, during cycle ergometry induced by functional electrical stimulation (FES) of the quadriceps, gluteus maximus and hamstring muscles. The algorithm was tested on four subjects who were paralysed owing to a complete spinal cord injury between T4 and T11. Using the multivariate equation, the control of movement was improved, and work was accomplished that was double (2940 Nm min(-1) compared with 5880 Nm min(-1)) that of traditional FES cycle ergometry, when muscle stimulation was also controlled by electrical stimulation. Stress on the body, assessed by cardiac output, was increased almost two-fold during maximum work with the new algorithm (81 min(-1) compared with 15 l min(-1) with the new algorithm). These data support the concept that the limitation to workload that a person can achieve on FES cycle ergometry is in the control equations and not in the paralysed muscle. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]