Search

Companies are increasingly adopting decentralized manufacturing strategies to manage multiple, geographically scattered manufacturing centers that are characterized not only by similar types of equipment, working methods, and productions, but also by variable mixes and volumes. This trend also applies to additive manufacturing, a well-established technology that allows the flexibility and customization of production to be increased, without significantly increasing the per unit cost. Thus, the need arises to monitor the performance of individual centers in a structured way, and to make practical comparisons of such centers. However, achieving this task is not so straightforward, given the inevitable differences in the characteristics of manufacturing centers and their productions. This paper presents a methodology that can be used to analyze and compare the production performance of a plurality of manufacturing centers from two different viewpoints: (i) quality, through a multivariate statistical analysis of product data concerning conformity with geometrical specifications, and (ii) process sustainability, with the aim of achieving a reduction in energy consumption, carbon dioxide emissions, and manufacturing time, through regression models pertaining to the selected metrics. The proposed methodology can be adopted during regular production operations, without requiring any ad hoc experimental tests. The description of the method is supported by an industrial case study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Additive manufacturing (AM) processes allow complex geometries to be produced with enhanced functionality, but technological challenges still have to be dealt with, in terms of surface finish and achieved tolerances. Among the consolidated powder-bed fusion processes, electron beam melting (EBM), which allows almost stress-free parts to be manufactured with a high productivity and minimum use of support structures, suffers from a poor surface quality. Thus, finishing processes have to be performed. The same geometrical complexity, which is considered one of the benefits of AM, becomes an issue when finishing is applied, in particular when internal features are present. Unconventional isotropic superfinishing processes could be a solution to this problem since they can generate a low surface roughness on complex geometries. However, the performance characteristics, with regard to the environmental sustainability and economic aspects, need to be evaluated since they are key factors that must be considered for decision-support tools when selecting a finishing process. The technological feasibility of the isotropic superfinishing (ISF) process, applied to Ti-6Al-4V parts produced by electron beam melting, is investigated in this paper by considering the dimensional and geometrical deviations induced by the finishing treatment, and from observations of the surface morphology. A significant reduction in surface roughness, Sa, to around 4 μm, has been observed on the most irregular surfaces, although the original shape is maintained. Environmental sustainability has been analyzed for all the manufacturing steps, from powder production to part fabrication, to the finishing process, and both the cumulative energy demand and material waste have been accounted for. The economic impact of the whole manufacturing chain has been evaluated, and the advantages of the ISF process are pointed out. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]