Search

Copyright of Der Pneumologe is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Der Internist is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Der Internist is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Der Pneumologe is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Der Pneumologe is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Der Pneumologe is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Der Internist is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Der Pneumologe is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

OBJECTIVE: To compare the real-life treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECBs) using moxifloxacin tablets or one of the oral macrolides azithromycin, clarithromycin or roxithromycin in terms of symptom relief, time until improvement and cure, overall efficacy and tolerability. METHODS: This prospective, non-interventional, multicentre study included out- patients with AECB whose last exacerbation was treated with a macrolide. The current AECB was treated either with moxifloxacin or with one of the macrolides azithromycin, clarithromycin or roxithromycin. Data were obtained on the patient’s characteristics, disease and treatment history, the course of the current AECB including time to improvement and cure, and the final assessments of efficacy and tolerability. All adverse events were recorded in patients treated with moxifloxacin; for patients receiving macrolides, only drug-related adverse events were reported. RESULTS: 464 physicians treated 904 patients with moxifloxacin and 846 patients with one of the macrolides. Age, sex and body mass index were well matched between the two treatment groups. However, more moxifloxacin than macrolide patients presented with a generally bad condition (62.8% vs 48.6%). About 42% of patients in both groups had had chronic bronchitis for 1−5 years, and about 27% for 5−10 years. The mean number of AECBs in the previous 12 months was 2.7 and 2.6, respectively. Moxifloxacin was administered to most patients for 5 (43.8%) or 7 days (42.4%). Patients in the macrolide group were treated in most cases with clarithromycin 500mg for 4–7 days, roxithromycin 300mg for 6–7 days or azithromycin 500mg for 3 days. Physicians assessed overall efficacy and tolerability as ‘very good’ or ‘good’ in 96.1% and 98.1%, respectively, of moxifloxacin-treated patients and in 67.5% and 91.7%, respectively, of macrolide-treated patients. The mean duration until improvement and cure of AECB was 3.2 days (± SD 1.5) and 6.2 days (± 2.6) in moxifloxacin-treated patients compared with 4.5 days (± 1.8) and 7.5 days (± 3.0) in macrolide-treated patients (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The results of this study conducted under real-life treatment conditions in patients with AECBs who were previously treated with a macrolide showed faster symptom relief and higher recovery rates with moxifloxacin compared with macrolides. The two treatment groups had comparably good safety and tolerability profiles. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The investigation of peripheral blood lymphocyte (PBL) subpopulations is of interest in a wide variety of inflammatory diseases. Since the number of circulating lymphocytes has been shown to be affected by smoking habits, it seems useful to know how PBL subpopulations are influenced. We therefore determined percentages and absolute numbers of a wide range of PBL subpopulations in smok-ers (n 4 14) and nonsmokers (n 4 14). PBLs were obtained from healthy volun-teers and analyzed by flow cytometry using antibodies for the detection of CD3, CD4, CD8, CD19, CD56, CD57, CD45RO, CD45RA, a/b and g/d T cell receptor epitopes. With the exception of CD3 + cells, no differences between smokers and nonsmokers were found regarding percentages of PBL subpopulations. Smokers were found to have higher absolute numbers of PBLs in the following subpopula-tions compared with nonsmokers: CD3 + , CD4 + , CD3 + a/b + , CD45RO + /CD4 + , and CD45RA + /CD4 + . Cytotoxic lymphocytes, natural killer cells, and B cells did not differ in number between smokers and nonsmokers. There was likewise no differ-ence in the number of the CD8 + a/b + and all cells bearing the g/d T cell receptor. Smoking increased the number of T cells and mainly CD4 + PBLs. The smoking habits of healthy control groups should therefore be taken into account when com-paring lymphocyte subpopulations in different diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

SDD in ventilated ICU patients continues to be a controversial issue. This form of prophylaxis significantly reduces infection-related morbidity in ICU patients, but, despite the large number of trials assessed, no definite conclusions can be drawn about the effect of this type of prophylaxis on mortality. There is evidence to support the use of SDD in some patient populations, including ventilated polytrauma patients, patients who have undergone surgery for oesophageal tumours and liver transplant patients. The use of SDD in patients receiving long-term ventilation, must, however, be questioned. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction and rationale. An accumulation of intraalveolar cells, especially of macrophages and granulocytes, can be observed in smokers. Since adhesion molecules are involved in the process of cell accumulation, in this study we investigated the hypothesis that the expression of endothelial adhesion molecules on pulmonary vascular endothelial cells is different in smokers and nonsmokers. Methods. We investigated lung biopsies from 26 patients who underwent thoracic surgery for localized malignancies (smokers: 15; nonsmokers: 11). Cryostat sections were stained by using immunohistochemistry (APAAP method) with antibodies against E- and P-selectin, the vascular adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1), and the intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1). The number of adhesion molecule-positive stained vessels was compared to the total number of vessels identified by the expression of von Willebrand's factor (vWF) and anti-CD31. Results. The two groups investigated showed no differences in the expression of E-, and P-selectin and of VCAM-1. In contrast, the expression of ICAM-1 was significantly increased in smokers (median 25 vessels/section, CI95%: 19-31) compared to nonsmokers (median 16 vessels/section, CI95%: 9-21) ( p = 0.030). In smoking subjects, we were also able to demonstrate a positive correlation between the duration of smoking expressed as pack years and the expression of ICAM-1 on pulmonary vessels (Spearman rank coefficient of correlation 0.857; p = 0.0002). Conclusion. The observed increased expression of ICAM-1 on pulmonary vascular endothelial cells in smokers compared to nonsmokers may be involved in the increased recruitment of inflammatory cells to the alveolar space of smokers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The human body possesses highly specialized cellular defense mechanisms that, when activated pathologically, can induce a number of immunologic disorders. For a normal cellular immune response, the following conditions must be fulfilled: (1) accumulation of white blood cells, (2) their diapedesis through the vessel walls of the inflammatory area affected by an injurious agent, and (3) normal cellular effector functions in the tissue. This cascade of inflammatory processes has recently been shown to be regulated by a group of molecules that are termed adhesion molecules and consist of three subfamilies: selectins, the immunoglobulin supergene family, and integrins. The cellular functions influenced by adhesion molecules include, among others, cytotoxic T-cell responses, CD4-dependent activation of B lymphocytes by T lymphocytes, activation of granulocytes and macrophages, phagocytosis of opsonized particles by monocytes, macrophages, and granulocytes, antigen-presenting function of macrophages, their antibody-dependent cytotoxicity, initiation of a respiratory burst by white blood cells, and activation of fibroblasts. Studies performed in recent years have shown that pathogenetically relevant changes in the expression and function of adhesion molecules are involved in a variety of pulmonary diseases. These changes include the accumulation and activation of alveolar macrophages in smokers, experimentally induced bronchial hyperreactivity in bronchial asthma, accumulation of eosinophils in allergic rhinitis, bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis, binding of viruses and bacteria to respiratory mucosa, and various mechanisms of acute damage to pulmonary parenchyma. Though their role in tumor development is still unclear, adhesion molecules are obviously involved in determining the route and organotropism of metastases. Further studies of the function of adhesion molecules in pulmonary diseases will contribute to our understanding of the pathomechanisms of these diseases and, through the development of specific antibodies, may provide attractive new therapeutic approaches to problems for which treatment is not yet available [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Nosocomial pneumonias, especially in ventilated patients, are a continuing problem in modern medicine. Pathogens most commonly involved with these pneumonias are Enterobacteriaceae, Ps. aeruginosa and S. aureus. Several prevention measures for nosocomial pneumonia are possible such as parenteral and topical antibiotics--a very controversial issue. Several studies with parenteral antibiotics, starting as early as 1954, could not prove any benefit of parenteral antibiotics in pneumonia prevention. Topical antibiotics, starting with polymyxin or gentamicin via the endotracheal tube in the 70s, gave controversial results. In a prospective, randomized, double-blind placebo controlled study with gentamicin via the endotracheal tube in ventilated ICU patients we found no significant reduction of pneumonia rate and mortality. However, the combined approach (SDD) of oropharyngeal, gastrointestinal and parenteral use of certain antibiotics appears to give promising results in specific patient subgroups such as ventilated polytrauma patients in ICU. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]